Yellow | 2019! It's On!

Here comes the boss, early as usual.
nBPt7gf.jpg

Holy cow!! You don't know how accurate you are. 1949 Ford, my first car, bought for $100 in September 1959. Flat head V-8, 3 speed with overdrive, exactly the same as the photo except it was grey. You're beginning to scare me Mud! :smile new:
 
The article mentions being sold to local investors. Doesnt mention those were Yellow Freight VPs. Or that Yellow still paid some of our fuel bills. Or that Yellow built our Richfield Ohio terminal, and ordered 600 trailers for us with no decals on them. We were to get the bugs out of two day freight (St Louis to Richfield to Boston), and then close, letting Yellow Corp keep Saia, the Ohio terminal, and the unbranded trailers.

According to that years NMFA, if we closed within a year of being sold, we would dovetail. They bought us in May, 98, closed us July, 99. Saia is spun off today...

Worst part. Drivers went out with deliveries Monday. Customers told us Yellow emailed them the previous Saturday that we were out of biz. Yet YF had nothing to do with us?????
 
Last edited:
The article mentions being sold to local investors. Doesnt mention those were Yellow Freight VPs. Or that Yellow still paid some of our fuel bills. Or that Yellow built our Richfield Ohio terminal, and ordered 600 trailers for us with no decals on them. We were to get the bugs out of two day freight (St Louis to Richfield to Boston), and then close, letting Yellow Corp keep Saia.

According to that years NMFA, if we closed within a year of being sold, we would dovetail. They bought us in May, 98, closed us July, 99. Saia is spun off today...
Another great yellow idea?? Buy em, bleed em, dump em.....
 
Took 18 months at Preston, but I got every dime. Warn act, and 5 weeks vacation, (two from 99, three earned for 2000) i think they were the only company to ever pay the full amount.

I got every thing owed by PIE, plus 2 trips I never ran, my conscience never bothered me enough to return the check.
 
lets start off small first and get ready for 2019...somebody needs to organize a .....NO teamster go to work day...that will get YRC freight and the IBT attention and let them know we are serious
Sounds good! They only way we get something back is to stand up to the union and the company, it's sad that it has come to this.
 
lets start off small first and get ready for 2019...somebody needs to organize a .....NO teamster go to work day...that will get YRC freight and the IBT attention and let them know we are serious
We have a vote no t shirt that's gets a lot of the company's attention every Friday
 
The danger in your posts is that you articulate better than the average person and you are correct on some of the business principles you mentioned,such as the mortgage insurance and the control the creditors have over the company.Then you throw in your own theory that it was impossible for the company to shut down.You will have people buying into something you conjured up with zero facts,it's just the way you think it is.

All the business analyst thought it was a miracle that YRCW survived.All of the trucking analysts were skeptical about their survival.The same analysts that sit in on the quarterly results meetings with Old Dominion,FED EX, XPO,ABF,UPS,ect.ect but you somehow know more than they do.
I guess you don't remember when we were being charged 150 million per year in interest with impossible loan terms.They had no intention of keeping us open and as a matter of fact they planned to profit from our closure with credit default swaps.Several investors were betting against our ability to survive.Read the link
https://www.counterpunch.org/2010/01/08/how-the-teamsters-beat-goldman-sachs/

This was exactly what was happening in the case of YRCW. According to Michael Greenberger, the University of Maryland law professor who headed Trading and Markets at the Commodity Futures Trading Commission in the Clinton Administration, this was a case of “Goldman (Sachs) et al seemingly forcing the country’s biggest truck company into bankruptcy in order to get pay-offs under CDS, with 50,000 jobs at stake.

I guess you and Wongway are smarter than the rest of us that thought our jobs were in peril and know more than a law professor so please send us the factual links.

By the way, round two was even closer to the end and without those cuts to satisfy the new lenders we would have absolutely been in bankruptcy protection.Ill be happy to give you and Wong those facts also.
The danger in your posts is that you articulate better than the average person and you are correct on some of the business principles you mentioned,such as the mortgage insurance and the control the creditors have over the company.Then you throw in your own theory that it was impossible for the company to shut down.You will have people buying into something you conjured up with zero facts,it's just the way you think it is.

All the business analyst thought it was a miracle that YRCW survived.All of the trucking analysts were skeptical about their survival.The same analysts that sit in on the quarterly results meetings with Old Dominion,FED EX, XPO,ABF,UPS,ect.ect but you somehow know more than they do.
I guess you don't remember when we were being charged 150 million per year in interest with impossible loan terms.They had no intention of keeping us open and as a matter of fact they planned to profit from our closure with credit default swaps.Several investors were betting against our ability to survive.Read the link
https://www.counterpunch.org/2010/01/08/how-the-teamsters-beat-goldman-sachs/

This was exactly what was happening in the case of YRCW. According to Michael Greenberger, the University of Maryland law professor who headed Trading and Markets at the Commodity Futures Trading Commission in the Clinton Administration, this was a case of “Goldman (Sachs) et al seemingly forcing the country’s biggest truck company into bankruptcy in order to get pay-offs under CDS, with 50,000 jobs at stake.

I guess you and Wongway are smarter than the rest of us that thought our jobs were in peril and know more than a law professor so please send us the factual links.

By the way, round two was even closer to the end and without those cuts to satisfy the new lenders we would have absolutely been in bankruptcy protection.Ill be happy to give you and Wong those facts also.

SiEFEe0.jpg


SiEFEe0.jpg


SiEFEe0.jpg


SiEFEe0.jpg


SiEFEe0.jpg


SiEFEe0.jpg


SiEFEe0.jpg

SiEFEe0.jpg



The danger in your posts is that you articulate better than the average person and you are correct on some of the business principles you mentioned,such as the mortgage insurance and the control the creditors have over the company.Then you throw in your own theory that it was impossible for the company to shut down.You will have people buying into something you conjured up with zero facts,it's just the way you think it is.

All the business analyst thought it was a miracle that YRCW survived.All of the trucking analysts were skeptical about their survival.The same analysts that sit in on the quarterly results meetings with Old Dominion,FED EX, XPO,ABF,UPS,ect.ect but you somehow know more than they do.
I guess you don't remember when we were being charged 150 million per year in interest with impossible loan terms.They had no intention of keeping us open and as a matter of fact they planned to profit from our closure with credit default swaps.Several investors were betting against our ability to survive.Read the link
https://www.counterpunch.org/2010/01/08/how-the-teamsters-beat-goldman-sachs/

This was exactly what was happening in the case of YRCW. According to Michael Greenberger, the University of Maryland law professor who headed Trading and Markets at the Commodity Futures Trading Commission in the Clinton Administration, this was a case of “Goldman (Sachs) et al seemingly forcing the country’s biggest truck company into bankruptcy in order to get pay-offs under CDS, with 50,000 jobs at stake.

I guess you and Wongway are smarter than the rest of us that thought our jobs were in peril and know more than a law professor so please send us the factual links.

By the way, round two was even closer to the end and without those cuts to satisfy the new lenders we would have absolutely been in bankruptcy protection.Ill be happy to give you and Wong those facts also.
 
Thomas Black, bloomberg writer (also Business Week, etc) , posts his email at the end of his articles and I asked him (January 9, 2014) about the satisfaction the creditors would get from a bankruptcy. He responded: "They won't get much satisfaction. In bankruptcy, they would likely end up doing some kind of refinancing anyway. I can't imagine they would go to liquidation with the assets they have"

Once bankruptcy was declared the customers would scatter and there would be nothing much left for the creditors in liquidation, new or old. So, they had to sit tight and wait for the net revenue for payback. this wasn't much of a remedy because profits aren't good.

What to do? Squeeze the employees to get the money back faster. Yeah, they would get paid the other way but not fast enough. If they could get paid straight away by bleeding away the employees they could get their money faster. With 10% interest recently. Not bad.

Your link doesn't deal with the nuts and bolts of bankruptcy only some kind of swap "debt for equity" without what that would entail. They actually always had that as "owners" of the YRC due to "collateral" : so much debt the company had forfeit the business to them.

Our contract expires March 31, 2019. My point is we haven't had a raise since 2006. By 2019 it will be 13 years. Thirteen years ago I was getting paid what I get now: $21.78. When is enough? The national average wage is $25.00/hour according to the bureau of labor statistics. Why are we getting so little? Are we going to go for more of the same? Are we worth more? Are we going to accept some story again? Somebody explain to me how I'm wrong. It's going to take some doing.
 
No they will not call for a strike. Why, you say? Maybe because they used our strike fund money to pay the mortgage on the hunting lodge the IBT owns. Not to mention the fishing resort off the coast of Tahiti. Hope that answers your question. von.
Wasn't but a few years ago I saw the 406 trailer up at Boyne Mtn mid July. Rates are usually discounted then in Northern MI:eck13:
 
lets start off small first and get ready for 2019...somebody needs to organize a .....NO teamster go to work day...that will get YRC freight and the IBT attention and let them know we are serious
Good Idea get these forms out to all terminals at all the companies !
5Pt7rrp.jpg
 
Top