It looks like YRC passed XPO also. I thought XPO had been #2 on that list before. Can that possibly be right?
Passed UPS Freight for the number 5 position
It looks like YRC passed XPO also. I thought XPO had been #2 on that list before. Can that possibly be right?
Yep, you're right. The past charts I've seen showed YRC itself at #4 and showed Holland and the others as separate.If you take YRC and combin it with the regional companies they own it would make it true. YRC on it’s wouldn’t have passed XPO
If you do it that way wouldn’t you have to remove XPO’s subsidiaries from their total revenue as well ?If you take YRC and combin it with the regional companies they own it would make it true. YRC on it’s wouldn’t have passed XPO
Con-Way was #2 before they were acquired, so I doubt those other XPO businesses are included in those numbers. In that case, all the warehouses and other transportation services would probably put the number much higher. The FedEx number is also for Freight only, not any of the other arms of FedEx.If you do it that way wouldn’t you have to remove XPO’s subsidiaries from their total revenue as well ?
Looks like OD will catch XPO in no time.This one has them separated
https://www.logisticsmgmt.com/artic...and_less_than_truckload_ltl_companies_in_2017
This one has them separated
https://www.logisticsmgmt.com/artic...and_less_than_truckload_ltl_companies_in_2017
You have to be Sherlock Holmes to figure out their financials.The regional companies are keeping YRC going strong from the reports I was reading the other day.
You have to be Sherlock Holmes to figure out their financials.
Or Bernie Madoff.You have to be Sherlock Holmes to figure out their financials.
Lmfao yrc probably don’t understand their own financial situation.Or Bernie Madoff.
Yeah that second chart posted showed Estes at #6 behind UPSF.UPSF is ahead of Estes in every list i seen. Their revenue is over 2.5 B vs Estes 2.4+ B
UPSF is ahead of Estes in every list i seen. Their revenue is over 2.5 B vs Estes 2.4+ B
Yeah that second chart posted showed Estes at #6 behind UPSF.
I guess it depends on whether you believe joc.com or logisticsmgmt.com then. The 2017 Estes number is the same on both sites, but the UPSF number is not on the joc.com top 5 chart. Weird.
I guess it depends on whether you believe joc.com or logisticsmgmt.com then. The 2017 Estes number is the same on both sites, but the UPSF number is not on the joc.com top 5 chart. Weird.