droppingaduece
TB Lurker
- Credits
- 0
Would u 2 please go home kiss and make out/up.Nobody cares u don't work here but yet u have a vested interest in our future.
Blah blah blah hypocrite blah blah blah
Would u 2 please go home kiss and make out/up.Nobody cares u don't work here but yet u have a vested interest in our future.
Blah blah blah hypocrite blah blah blah
Consistencies throughout the system as related to the standard of living....I agree.
The guy doing the same job as me should have the ability to have the same standard of living given the same priorities.
If I am paid by the mile and have to drive in severe weather or severe traffic my compensation per mile should be different than the guy able to average 65mph for 8 hours a day, 5 days a week, 52 weeks a year....or are you suggesting their pay per mile should be the same?
If so, how do you find the guy able and willing to drive a maximum of 350 miles a shift without paying the guy doing 500 miles a day way more than you need to?
As for the road runs, seniority does dictate that the senior gentleman, can take the easier path to higher pay. Likely he started with the less popular run and worked his way up to that position of seniority. He may also, at some point want to take a shorter less challenging run as he ages and needs less income. The city should be no different. Some run are easier than others, the senior man/woman should be able to pick what he/she feels capable of, IMHO. (please no ball payer analogies :Poke:)
How about brothel analogies? ;)
I get that. The issue I have is when you have a "city" run that is 50 miles out before the first stop. Senior guy bids it because it suits his desires. Then as that area grows in population, there is a point where that senior guy can't quite get that route all done in a day and the service is starting to falter. The union guy will say, break it into 2 runs, get him some help. Problem is, that area is still too remote to support another run, and a younger guy could get that route done. He's basically bitten off more than he can chew, and the logistics of the route don't support breaking it up. We need reasonable, logical folks making some of the decisions.
How about brothel analogies? ;)
I get that. The issue I have is when you have a "city" run that is 50 miles out before the first stop. Senior guy bids it because it suits his desires. Then as that area grows in population, there is a point where that senior guy can't quite get that route all done in a day and the service is starting to falter. The union guy will say, break it into 2 runs, get him some help. Problem is, that area is still too remote to support another run, and a younger guy could get that route done. He's basically bitten off more than he can chew, and the logistics of the route don't support breaking it up. We need reasonable, logical folks making some of the decisions.
How about brothel analogies? ;)
I get that. The issue I have is when you have a "city" run that is 50 miles out before the first stop. Senior guy bids it because it suits his desires. Then as that area grows in population, there is a point where that senior guy can't quite get that route all done in a day and the service is starting to falter. The union guy will say, break it into 2 runs, get him some help. Problem is, that area is still too remote to support another run, and a younger guy could get that route done. He's basically bitten off more than he can chew, and the logistics of the route don't support breaking it up. We need reasonable, logical folks making some of the decisions.
Your argument makes no sense, if they break it into 2 they can give each guy stops on the way to the area so they both have plenty of work.
Not bad Ex, BUT... (You knew there would be a but, right?) Bids are not "Lifetime" bids. No area grows at such a pace as to be altered significantly in a 6 month period. Historically, bids (generally) last no longer that 6 months, and are conducted at "center discretion", when the need arises. Long distance runs typically have fewer stops, and more miles. Therefore most time is spent "in transit", between stops. There is little time (efficiency) to be gained there, other than route selection. Speeding and unsafe driving actually saves very little time as to not be a factor. Knowledge of the customer base (and their idiosyncrasies), shortcuts, anticipated delay areas etc, make the difference on these bids. If a route grows to a point that it becomes too labor intensive, the guy will likely bid something else, and so on, until ultimately he must retire.
Damn ex396 why dont you just fire the old guy after he has already given the company the best years of his life..now that hes gotten older and is not as fast as he used to be you can be the first ballw#sher to go in the office and figure out with the tm how you can take his run with the little seniority that you have.oh yeah how many guys do you work with are walking around with your knife in their back?How about brothel analogies? ;)
I get that. The issue I have is when you have a "city" run that is 50 miles out before the first stop. Senior guy bids it because it suits his desires. Then as that area grows in population, there is a point where that senior guy can't quite get that route all done in a day and the service is starting to falter. The union guy will say, break it into 2 runs, get him some help. Problem is, that area is still too remote to support another run, and a younger guy could get that route done. He's basically bitten off more than he can chew, and the logistics of the route don't support breaking it up. We need reasonable, logical folks making some of the decisions.
One problem I see with your analogy is this, when the company set the bar, you are at their mercy. Today you might be able to get the route done, but tomorrow they want more and no matter how hard you try, it's not enough.How about brothel analogies? ;)
I get that. The issue I have is when you have a "city" run that is 50 miles out before the first stop. Senior guy bids it because it suits his desires. Then as that area grows in population, there is a point where that senior guy can't quite get that route all done in a day and the service is starting to falter. The union guy will say, break it into 2 runs, get him some help. Problem is, that area is still too remote to support another run, and a younger guy could get that route done. He's basically bitten off more than he can chew, and the logistics of the route don't support breaking it up. We need reasonable, logical folks making some of the decisions.
Damn ex396 why dont you just fire the old guy after he has already given the company the best years of his life..now that hes gotten older and is not as fast as he used to be you can be the first ballw#sher to go in the office and figure out with the tm how you can take his run with the little seniority that you have.oh yeah how many guys do you work with are walking around with your knife in their back?
We need reasonable, logical folks making some of the decisions.
Will it make any difference?
What will life be like working with FedexF 2 years from now with the union in place? different or the same soup warmed over?
It will be different, no doubt. Some plusses and some minuses. Whether or not the plusses outweigh those minuses will depend on your priorities and just what type of price you place on your work environment.
Yep, we all deserve respect, and to vote the union in just for that reason alone is a good one...
... How can the union change the situation? And, how much will it cost? Just what is the union really offering here? Will it make any difference?
What will life be like working with FedexF 2 years from now with the union in place? different or the same soup warmed over?
IMHO
1) The Union will be us, not some mystical force, and the change comes from a seat at the table, a voice, as of yet unheard.
2) Cost is 2 1/2 hours pay per month
3) The union offers stability, continuity, and some say in matters related to your employment.
4)Yes, it will make a difference. There seems to be consensus on this. Even the company seems to agree.
5)NO one can say exactly what 2 years after union representation will bring, but it will most certainly be better for the drivers, in many ways, than the last 2 years without.
6)Same soup warmed over, would be if the effort were to fail.
Question for you: Do you like generic, low quality soup, or premium top shelf soup? I prefer stew, or gumbo, with some MEAT in it!