imported_River17
TB Veteran
- Credits
- 0
oldcoot
Thanks for posting the policy
chapter and verse.
Thanks for posting the policy
chapter and verse.
Help me out here. I went to work for af I agreed to their rules of work. Fed ex comes along and buys them, I never agreed to their ways of doing things. I never signed a form saying I do or took some purple oath. Now lets say I refuse a drug test( which I would never do because peeing is something I excel at, and its easy money) How can they do anything to me?
I'll say it again just in case you didn't see it before. They didn't come to the employee's houses to test them. They tested them at work. Smoke it at home if you are so inclined. Just don't come to work under the influence.
You still haven't explained how testing someone who is on duty, at work is intrusive.
They want to "catch" me, which is why you are considered guilty until your pee proves you innocent. That is *** backwards to the way this country is supposed to run.
If they considered you guilty until your pee proves you innocent then you'd have to wait until the results came back.
roog
But the only conclusion you can draw is that they think you are guilty, because they are testing you, so in reality, you shouldn't be able to drive until the results come back. What if I'm pumped full of something they don't detect and after obtaining my fluid I go out and kill a bus full of nuns. How did random make anyone safer?
Or better yet, I'm clean when I go in, then out in the clinic parking lot, I shoot my arm full of heroin, and off I go. Random testing didn't keep anyone safer.
What random does is catch a few people that smoke pot. It may get the lone over the road guy on speed, but he can drive until the results come back. How does that make the public safer?
But the only conclusion you can draw is that they think you are guilty, because they are testing you, so in reality, you shouldn't be able to drive until the results come back. What if I'm pumped full of something they don't detect and after obtaining my fluid I go out and kill a bus full of nuns. How did random make anyone safer?
Or better yet, I'm clean when I go in, then out in the clinic parking lot, I shoot my arm full of heroin, and off I go. Random testing didn't keep anyone safer.
What random does is catch a few people that smoke pot. It may get the lone over the road guy on speed, but he can drive until the results come back. How does that make the public safer?
Franklin
A bus full of nuns ????
in Puget Sound ???????
But the only conclusion you can draw is that they think you are guilty, because they are testing you, so in reality, you shouldn't be able to drive until the results come back.