- Credits
- 500
Sometimes, I have to visit their cousins on the Katy Freeway ( I-10 West ) between 5:30 and 7:00 am.Driverless cars and trucks on the Houston East Freeway at 6:00am. Mother of all demolition derbys.
Sometimes, I have to visit their cousins on the Katy Freeway ( I-10 West ) between 5:30 and 7:00 am.Driverless cars and trucks on the Houston East Freeway at 6:00am. Mother of all demolition derbys.
I will start worring when they can program a truck to back itself into a dock and between trailers. If that was possible that should be the first concern. There are tons of newer drivers now that have a nearly impossible time learning that....
Chiz, you can't have a trucking company without having insurance. Who is going to sell an insurance policy, to a company, that tries to operate driverless trucks?
Driverless cars and trucks on the Houston East Freeway at 6:00am. Mother of all demolition derbys.
I liked the Jetson's as much as anybody but, at some point, you have got to come back down to Earth. If trucks and cars could be autonomous, on an open course, then why do trains, which travel on a closed course, still have human crews operating them?I dont think you are understanding autonomous vehicles/ The vehicles will be communicating with each other so there wont be collisions.
Wouldn't let me post an actual link so type in the www. If you need to.....I liked the Jetson's as much as anybody but, at some point, you have got to come back down to Earth. If trucks and cars could be autonomous, on an open course, then why do trains, which travel on a closed course, still have human crews operating them?
Im not sure what the teamsters can do if anything. I do know however UPS has invested big bucks in a company working on this technology.Wouldn't let me post an actual link so type in the www. If you need to.....
wired.com/2013/04/why-arent-trains-autonomous/
There is your short answer.
It's interesting they also mention organized labor as a reason that trains aren't automated. I'd also venture to guess that there are a tiny amount of train operators compared to truck drivers, so the labor savings wont be nearly as buge for train companies as they will be for trucking companies.
Which also begs the question as to what the Teamsters are doing about this. Not to turn this into yet another mind numbing union thread......(not a union guy BTW, but i am curuous as to what their stance on this issue is)
Not so fast.Budweiser already has an autonomous truck. It took a load of beer from Ft. Collins CO through Denver and delivered to Colorado Springs. No problems. If Bud does it, so will your company (eventually).
This isn't true. They did one test run under very controlled circumstance. Let's not start rumors please.Budweiser already has an autonomous truck. It took a load of beer from Ft. Collins CO through Denver and delivered to Colorado Springs. No problems. If Bud does it, so will your company (eventually).
There wasn't a denial it happened, but it's far from the "sky is falling" rhetoric you posted. This was a test for Otto, not Budweiser. They simply used it as free advertising and it got plenty of play.The fact that a company such as Budweiser, who has far more employees and trucks than any LTL company, would pursue this technology is a testament to its value and eventual implementation. Bury your head in the sand, I don't care. The reality is that autonomy has a future in many forms of transportation, not just trucking. Denial will not stop the inevitable.
You better start worrying, that technology is here now, and is better at blindsiding in an alley off the street than you or me.I will start worring when they can program a truck to back itself into a dock and between trailers. If that was possible that should be the first concern. There are tons of newer drivers now that have a nearly impossible time learning that....
Perfect example of "head in the sand". First of all trucks will be first because of the profit. If triples and RM doubles offer a 30% savings then it will be at least double than that savings when they link trucks together, which they are already doing in Europe. I agree it is a bit down the road, but it is coming and I am afraid a bit quicker than most realize.Triples & RM doubles offer at least a 30% labor savings. They've been used for quite some time. They are also heavily restricted as to routing. I guess I'll start worrying about employment when the roads we travel have autonomous cars or buses. That will happen long before 80,000# of "Oh ::::, how do we stop it?" takes my job.
Actually, no. Not if they are all driverless, and on the same computer system. According to the innovators and insurance companies - we drivers are the reason for crashes. Computers won't enter the 'must hurry and cut' syndrome.Driverless cars and trucks on the Houston East Freeway at 6:00am. Mother of all demolition derbys.
Just wait until that driverless truck tries to pull into a driveway with 200 employees leaving work, and blocks the highway for 20 to 30 minutes because it senses traffic in front of it, AND THE COPS TRY TO GIVE THE "HELPER/DRIVER" a ticket.Actually, no. Not if they are all driverless, and on the same computer system. According to the innovators and insurance companies - we drivers are the reason for crashes. Computers won't enter the 'must hurry and cut' syndrome.