HM,
Actually, there was no valid point to prove or disprove here. You had to know from the beginning that no Union can legally promise anything and put it in writing. So you assumed that by asking the question (again, I might add) and getting the "answer" that you knew you'd get, your co-workers would suddenly see the light and vote no due to the fact that you'll receive no promises.
It seems to me that you're ducking the questions asked of you by DS and myself. Why? Also, how does the NMFA seem to benefit the Teamsters and not the workers, who are actually one and the same? I'm waiting to hear this one.
You asked and we answered. How about some answers from you now? Do you think you and your co-workers would be better off with the NMFA, which once signed is your "promise", or not?