Maybe, that would have been the best thing, a third board? The problem with the third board would have been that, in the near future, every road job would have been abolished and there would have only been the UE board and the city board anyway. As long as a road man would have been able to stay on the UE job he would have be OK, but if he would have had to leave the UE board for some reason and didn't have a road job to go back to, he would have gone to the bottom of the city board. Let's all remember that this isn't something that we should get mad at each other about but something we should be mad at the company and our Union leaders for selling us on, knowing full well what was going to happen. In very little time there will only be one board anyway, in my opinion, because the company will abolish all road jobs and every road man will have no choice but to bid to the UE position. The main issue with going from two boards to one board, in LO is, in my opinion, that its been this type two board system for over thirty years, that I know of. Now is it fair to people that have been doing it this way for so long to be forced to change without voting on it? There have been several people that have went from the road board to the city board and vice-versa. They are only allowing people to use their current bidding seniority, is that fair? Just throwing my two cents in to the discussion. One board would be great and the most fair way of doing things if you could only do it without penalizing the men that have went back and forth between the two different boards, thats not the option here. Like I said, in my opinion, there will be only one board in the not so distance future anyway because the road board bids will be abolished and rebid to UE jobs. Its not what we were sold but its the way they're trying to do things now.
P.S. Oh, by the way, we don't have the year and a day here, so its a little different for us, than other places.