What's new

Yellow | Today's dockets

EX396

EX396

TB Veteran
Credits
415
Anybody read them? One was a letter to all creditors from the Court basically reminding all creditors that you need to file a claim, not write letters to the Court. Also a handwritten letter posted from a ticked-off Teamster, likely related.
 
EX396 said:
Anybody read them? One was a letter to all creditors from the Court basically reminding all creditors that you need to file a claim, not write letters to the Court. Also a handwritten letter posted from a ticked-off Teamster, likely related.
Click to expand...
That's been the problem at Yellow for many years. NO ONE reads...... The letter from the bankruptcy court arrived 2 days ago and I posted in Yellow Corp Teamsters FB group. Many comments asking what it was. Because they did not read it. :duh: :732:
 
albag said:
That's been the problem at Yellow for many years. NO ONE reads...... The letter from the bankruptcy court arrived 2 days ago and I posted in Yellow Corp Teamsters FB group. Many comments asking what it was. Because they did not read it. :duh: :732:
Click to expand...
Lead a horse to water...
 
albag said:
That's been the problem at Yellow for many years. NO ONE reads...... The letter from the bankruptcy court arrived 2 days ago and I posted in Yellow Corp Teamsters FB group. Many comments asking what it was. Because they did not read it. :duh: :732:
Click to expand...
Will you post it here?
 
truckinus said:
this is pretty funny if anyone hasn't read it.
Click to expand...
Sorry, but "funny" isn't what I thought of after reading Jeff's letter. I envisioned an angry, frustrated former Yellow employee who isn't very "up-to-speed" on how to deal with the Court system. The gist of what Jeff had to say is heartfelt. I hope you noticed that two docket entries later, Judge Goldblatt went to the trouble to explain what "ex parte" means, and why he can't respond to it. He did the only thing he really could, which was to post it on the docket. Kudos to Jeff for speaking his mind, even if the form isn't quite appropriate for the legal setting.
 
Real Teamster said:
Sorry, but "funny" isn't what I thought of after reading Jeff's letter. I envisioned an angry, frustrated former Yellow employee who isn't very "up-to-speed" on how to deal with the Court system. The gist of what Jeff had to say is heartfelt. I hope you noticed that two docket entries later, Judge Goldblatt went to the trouble to explain what "ex parte" means, and why he can't respond to it. He did the only thing he really could, which was to post it on the docket. Kudos to Jeff for speaking his mind, even if the form isn't quite appropriate for the legal setting.
Click to expand...
Well said Real Teamster. Exactly what I was thinking. Better stated than what I was initially going to post and thought better of it. If the man has a legitimate claim against Yellow I hope family or a fellow co-worker reaches out to him and helps him navigate the system.
 
truckinus said:
Its definitely ironic that this guy is the only one speaking out for the 30,000.
Click to expand...
Not all that ironic. BTW, I tried to find a phone number for him to help him file his legal paperwork correctly. Got an area code and prefix, but not the last four numbers. I'm not willing to pay the web sites for something that isn't guaranteed to be accurate. Does somebody have the last four digits of his phone? It's probably safe to post that, if that's all you're putting out there.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top