I'm determined to NOT spend a lot of time on this, but there are some points that should be considered, just off the top of my head.
And just so we know, I wanted to like this announcement, under the theme of "assuming positive intent".
The windfall at a glance (in billions)
1.5 Facilities in Memphis & Indi
1.5 Funding existing pension
0.2 Cost of early raise
3.2 Total investment stated in press release
As a percentage of Corp spending on salaries & benefits, $200M is .93%. Not even 1%
1/3 of that $200M goes to leadership incentive bonus. Fine in concept , but the small slice gets even smaller.
Seems to run counter to the PSP philosophy. Shouldn't people be a little higher priority that the above figures would suggest?
This should apply only to US workers. It stems from changes to US tax code. Other countries already had more favorable Corp. tax rates, so they should be unaffected.
We, as a group, voted (in part) for the concept of this more favorable business climate. Without that disruptive change, this most favorable tax policy would never have become a reality. You're welcome.
This $200M number is for all opp-cos, but does NOT include pilots. They are under contract for the pre-agreed term.
$200M cost suggests a predetermined (known) amount of that early raise, unless that is a grey number, which seems unlikely. Possible? Sure...
We don't know the ratios or how that number will be applied, but we must assume percentages to be similar to the past, in terms of allocation.
Seem the decision was made to remain mid-pack. Nothing bold or disruptive here. No advantage in the marketplace of recruiting. Opportunity missed, IMHO. But there is NEXT year., and the year after that...
At this point it all comes down to the amount of the early increase. THAT could change everything, but the numbers do NOT indicate that it will.
* I would suggest taking the upcoming survey seriously. Even though the decision will have been, or has likely already been, made.