I would say the apwa&teamsters are not worried about the RCH barn.Very small barn.When you say TEAMSTER to somebody probaly the first thing to come to most people's minds is crooks
.Most organized labor unions do little for their workers,now a days. I think by the support on the parcel side you have'nt heard the last of the apwa by a long shot.GOOD THINGS TAKE TIME!!!!
HRS - SLAVE, If good things take time, and if you are an APWA supporter, then you can honestly admit that the APWA has no credible argument in what they call to be the good fight. If they do come forth with one, and it seems realistic, then I may consider a swaying vote if it is backed by proof.
Let us draw a hyperthetical here, lets say for example that the new HYBRID TEAMSTER CONTRACT FOR UPSF, contains a SEPF ( single employer pention fund) with a joint venture in management between UPS and the Temsters, which is all your argument is based on and the APWA , would you not sighn for this contract, if UPS gaurantees in the pention what the APWA has offered and solidarity, along with the additional bennies in health and werlfare from the NMFA ( National Master Freight Agreement) Would you not sighn on the dotted line for this agreement?
I would ,and why you may ask . We already have most of what most call the "Industry Standard", and as far as I am concearned it is underinflated, but that is a whole seperate argument. I would be more than happy to have just the protection from the Teamster's based on some of the flawed practices by MGNT. and what little protection I can get from this ,I feel I should have considering there is a local in my back door, and it is certainly without doubt more then what I currently get now.
Which brings me too this credible argument, If there is a greivance to be fought here in the north, and both dan, van, and the union busting lawyer are in the south, how long of a greivance session must I look forward to until a local is established in this neck of the woods? And who's monies are they going to use too help me fight the good fight ,OURS which could be quite costly for our paying members. I see you are infavor of a union, I am sure you do not believe as well as others on this board that we as a company is being managed fairly, so I would assume a greivance process could be used by a good portion of people across the country, who will be paying for this? US.
As opposed to an already established union, in all areas of the US, now I feel the start up costs for this so called union are and is in my opinion underinflated, in respect to what they have put in wrighting for us to see. Not even a good publication with effort I may add.
Dan and van had given us some paraphanailia to look at on these boards ,by numerous kind UPSF personnell, and for thier generosity ,I am thankfull that someone gave me the oppertunity too look at what they had too say, but what I have seen ,is more of an mudslinging contest directed to the Teamsters ,and very little help and credibility that could possibly help us as an entity.
In other words they need to sell this want to be union, too us with credibility, and they have not done this. Forget about the teamsters and tell us a little about yourself. We must look at the big picture, and all they are putting emphises in, is what the Teamsters are not currently doing, I know this, tell me what you can do for me and back it up with credibility, and tell un honestly, what the start up cost's for this union will truely be, do not say one thing, then after the vote tell us something else, at that point they are no better then the entity they accuse of doing the same, and by that time it's too late. At least with the Teamsters I know what I am up against.