Big companies have everything in place, but they can't resist the urge to monopolize the industry.peg leg said:My opinion--no one has to buy any one--- big companies have everything in place
fedkins said:My vote is Fedex Freight....:sonar: :TR10driving03:
extra cost is past on:smilie_132: to customer there not worried about fuel. Plus big companies get kick backs from washington with how much fuel they use. Fedex has great cash flow. Stock is doing great and they need a company with terminals, people, equipment and authority so they ahve reliability with there canada freight. Dodn't know what will happen though if they do buy Watkins when it comes to the terminals in 48 states, but I can tell you this FXF doesn't have a truckload identity yet and FXF doesn't ship alot with national accounts cause we don't have the capacity for it. FXF has been expanding and building terminals like crazy the last few yrs. July is the beginning of Fedex's fiscal year, so I guess time will tell us very soon!gearshifter said:Good point
did'nt they just buy?,never mind! hey,just think,we could all be one big,brown happy family,and call ity woops.[watkins,overnite,ups].IR CookieMonster said:UPS is looking for more LTL carriers. Who knows ?
BUTTONMAN74 said:did'nt they just buy?,never mind! hey,just think,we could all be one big,brown happy family,and call ity woops.[watkins,overnite,ups].
BillyLo said:A good friend of mine from FXF HQ told me they'll be purschasing Watkins in June. They're really interested in the idea of having lease p & d drivers and would like to see how it works out with an opporitunity to grow. If this plan works out successfully, Fed Ex plans to trash all of their current drivers by 2010 or to force them into lease plans if they're interested in staying around. Wow, sucks for those guys!