That is true as well, but isn't it funny that a company will spend so much money to keep a 3rd party organization out "for YOUR best interests?" That's all we keep hearing is that it is for us.
Or frustrated
Lost count after 10 filings against xpo and the former on nlrb site. I better hurry and get to those hearings
What do you think one of your (CEO)s make, just saying!
I guess even dock worker's are getting involved.. Taking action.
You said a union give back last time I checked the union didn't give the company nothing back the employees voted for it. Re read what you sent me.
Never said they did pros and cons to union. Difference members have direct say in business if their involved. When was the last a coworkers had a say in management decisions?
Oh and do you care to elaborate on your federal government theory as well?
A lot of people conveniently forget about are give back for couple years there and the kicker was that we were not in finically distress . Talk about taking advantage of an opportunity.
Ours wasn't a giveback....I call it a snatchback. We never had a choice. I don't think I've seen a single 5% raise increase to get that back to us either.
When you give back 5% and lose nearly 2yrs of cola ( cost of living adjustments) you never get back to where you were.
They took away because Doug and john needed to match all the other companies CEO'S compensation.
Cf was spun off just to do what you said Wither on the vine if you don't think that was a long term plan than I got some swamp property for you to buy.(no offense intended) Just look at the day they chose to close the doors .. Labor Day . You can not by law put a union company out of business and at the same time start a non union carrier that does the same thing you have to spin it to look like your starting regional carriers that do something different. In the end we do basically the same thing Cf did and operate under one name but with no union. It's that simple.
Don't forget we had to buy cfi
Yeah how about that ... at the same time they couldn't afford a pension for us they spent 750 million for them. That was in 2007 and in 2008 they were in such dire financial straits that they needed a giveback front the employees. If would have been a union carrier back then they could of blame it on the union.
