Register

If this is your first visit, please click the Sign Up now button to begin the process of creating your account so you can begin posting on our forums! The Sign Up process will only take up about a minute of two of your time.

Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Watch us on YouTube

Page 10 of 60 FirstFirst ... 8910111220 ... LastLast
Results 91 to 100 of 599
Like Tree214Likes

Thread: Obama joined in denouncing Rush Limbaugh's slur of student

  1. #91
    Magoo's Avatar
    Magoo is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    16,794
    Quote Originally Posted by Bubba74 View Post
    From the transcripts:



    law school usually three years
    Box of 10 Trojan condoms $8

    $3000 divided by 8= 375 times 10= 3750 condoms.
    three years of law school equals 1095 days
    thus, using math, she needs 3 condoms a day for law school, guess what, she is a slut.
    You people sure know how to bury your party, how many woman voters did you draw to your side with this garbage.
    There is a lot of men who don't like somebody to pick on woman, we think those Arabs in the middle east are bad to the female population and they are.
    When you people do it, its not much better.
    Get Therapy
    R-14Driver likes this.

  2. #92
    dcmilkwagon's Avatar
    dcmilkwagon is offline Armed, not a victim
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    2,563
    Quote Originally Posted by NPME View Post
    Ok DC, the entire hearing has been posted by R-14. I challenge you to validate every claim you have made. Where did she ever mention condoms or even her own sex life for that matter? I really don't expect you to answer this question because in typical right wing fashion you'll ignore the facts and attempt to spin things in your favor.
    Now that I have had a good nights rest I will submit that R-14 did not post the entire hearing. Here is the entire hearing from c-span's video files;

    http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/HealthandC

    Throughout the entire hearing birth control and unfettered access to such is the driving topic. Law Student Reproductive Justice, (LSRJ), has been planning a move such as this for several years. They knew that they were too late to get someone in front of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee last week. They also knew that Sandra Fluke had no other credentials or expertise in the matters that were being debated last week other than that she is a female, ( this is just my assumption, I don't want to upset the gays, lesbians and trans-sexuals here), my teenage daughter has as much expertise in womens health as Miss Fluke does. However, they also knew that they did have the political conections to get someone in front of the House Democratic Steering and Policy Committee. They knew they had Nancy Pelosi's ear, and knew that they could get someone in front of C-Spans cameras.

    I stand by my original conviction that this brew-ha-ha is nothing more than an attempt to get free contraception, for anyone who wants it, put into Obama's healthcare plan. The most expedient way of getting birthcontrol and birthcontrol products put into the list of coverages in Obamacare, is to make sure before Obamacare takes effect in 2014, the public is used to having that service before 2014. Once a product or service has been "given" to an entitlement minded society, it is extremely hard, or impossible, to take it away from them. So to make sure that society has this, they, (Obamas followers), wants to force the insurance companies to provide coverage and FREE, that's right they want all contraceptive devices, ie: condoms, BC pills, morning after pills, for free, to anybody who wants or asks for them.

    Sandra Fluke is a willing accomplist in this political action group known as Law Student Reproductive Justice. She may even be on the payroll of LSRJ through their fellowship program, I have no proof that she is recieving monatary assistance, but the organization does pay interns to do the sort of service that she is providing for them right now. I submit this as proof from LSRJ's own website:

    Reproductive Justice Fellowship Program (RJFP)
    Details: The Reproductive Justice Fellowship Program (RJFP) provides new lawyers with professional entry points into the reproductive justice movement while enhancing the legal and policy capacity at nonprofit organizations working to achieve reproductive justice. LSRJ will place eight (8) Reproductive Justice (RJ) Fellows at organizations in Washington, D.C. for a year-long program (starting in August 2012), which includes mentoring, professional development, substantive training, and networking opportunities. Each RJ Fellow will be paid a $50,000 stipend plus benefits. The RJ Fellow‟s work will further the placement organization‟s reproductive justice agenda, which may include issues concerning access to health care and family planning services; comprehensive sex education; restoring public funding for abortion services; support for pregnant and parenting prisoners and teens; and domestic violence and HIV/AIDS advocacy. The RJ Fellow may be responsible for conducting legal and policy analysis; educating elected officials, policymakers, allies, and constituents; participating in advocacy efforts; and representing the placement organization in coalition meetings and conferences.
    Law Students for Reproductive Justice (page 33).

    My original postings may have been crass and a little bit over the top, but I will not, and cannot, appologize for the things I have said. I also will not, and cannot, compromise my root feelings, beliefs and convictions in the political arena. It is my full belief that the Progressive Liberals want to take complete control of every aspect of our lives in this nation. I will not appologize, nor compromise, with those that are so willing to give up their freedoms to the modern-day slave owners and traders known as Progressive Liberals. Why on earth would people willing allow themselves to become slaves to another group of people? I don't understand the thought process that would allow this. I want the freedom to prosper, or fail, in my life on my own terms and on my own merits and talents. I will not be a slave to government. The President, Congress, and the Courts are supposed to work for us, to protect the rights and freedoms of ALL it's citizens, not just a select few.
    Last edited by dcmilkwagon; 03-03-2012 at 09:10 AM. Reason: add footnote page
    Toby likes this.

  3. #93
    Starkravinloon's Avatar
    Starkravinloon is offline Atlanta.. I'm Baack......
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    24,148
    Quote Originally Posted by Magoo View Post
    You people sure know how to bury your party, how many woman voters did you draw to your side with this garbage.
    There is a lot of men who don't like somebody to pick on woman, we think those Arabs in the middle east are bad to the female population and they are.
    When you people do it, its not much better.
    Get Therapy
    "You people"...Now you've gone and done it... "Rev. Jesse...Rev. Sharpton..Kick him in his narrow ass"....You people....
    Magoo likes this.
    Hillary(on the Benghazi attacks): "What difference does it make"... YOU, make no difference to us, but for those families of the dead, you could have made a big difference.....

  4. #94
    Northern Flash's Avatar
    Northern Flash is offline DUHHHH King.
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    9,226
    Her testimony used examples of women having to have their ovaries removed because of the lack of finances to afford the medical care needed. It's a personal responsibility to get the health care needed, regardless of your financial situation.

    And I don't mean to make light of a woman not being able to have a child because I know how important it is to woman. But, there are a lot of women (and men) who can't have children, and not because of the lack of birth control pills either. That's how life goes sometimes. When life throws you a lemon......make lemonade. Adopt a child, and love the heck out of it.
    Toby likes this.
    I spend most days hunting, fishing, and on Truckingboards. The rest of my days are just wasted.

  5. #95
    Toby's Avatar
    Toby is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    44,192
    "The Planet Has A Fever" ~ Al Gore
    Al Gore the Spokes mouth for today's "Green Movement" and "Climate Scare" has long roots in promoting population control as a means to "healing" our planet. Recently at a "Games for Change" conference in New York he stated, " One of the things we could do about it is to change the technologies, to put out less of this pollution, to stabilize the population, and one of the principle ways of doing that is to empower and educate girls and women. You have to have ubiquitous availability of fertility management so women can choose how many children have, the spacing of the children… You have to educate girls and empower women. And that’s the most powerful leveraging factor, and when that happens, then the population begins to stabilize and societies begin to make better choices and more balanced choices.” Since when does America have a population control problem? When you look at the actual figures post the World War II Baby Boom population figures have been on a steady decline. Somehow Mr. Gore thinks that if we exterminate a child or if we can emulate something like what China practices with the one child policy in this country that we will "heal" our planet. He mentions that we need to educate our girls, does that include teaching them that they need to take personal responsibility for their actions as well and that we should start those lessons at a young age instead of teaching them that they will not have to worry about any consequences for their actions because the government will take care of them in the end? Does that include teaching them the best method to avoid an unwanted pregnancy is abstinence? No Mr. Gore like many others that surround this issue and this administration have deeper goals and beliefs. One question that I have from his statement that he fails to mention, is it empowering women and young ladies by teaching them that slaughtering a Human life or not taking personal responsibility for their actions really a solution to our pollution concerns or is it part of a much larger agenda?

    Mr. Gore in particular has pushed that we need to further increase regulations or mandates on a whole host of sectors besides population control. How do we go about doing this? We Indoctrinate the youth! One needs to remember that Population Control does not only mean controlling the rate of births, but means controlling the population. Once you take the steps down the road of determining that through a mandate or regulation that a private institution should be forced to do something that goes against its teachings where do you stop? Do you take the next step and say we need to mandate that we need to exterminate the so called "Unwanted" or "Undesirable" such as those that are not as physically or mentally fit as others? Do we than mandate under the auspice that a particular child needs to be aborted because they may not grow up into a contributing member of society? Do we than determine that we should examine and mandate that a senior citizen is no longer a contributing member of society and is a burden on our planet so we should euthanize them as well? Should a government then through a panel of bureaucrats decide what medical coverage an individual can receive based on their ability to or drain to the society at large contribute? Should a panel of government officials place a scale of individual pollution factor that an individual contributes and decide through a mandate or regulation just what freedom that individual will have to heat or cool their home, or drive their car? Should a government panel start down the road of determining the sex or numbers of children that we are allowed to have? After all it may be a medical issue or a safety issue that they can cite as a reason to start down this slippery road.
    dcmilkwagon likes this.

  6. #96
    Magoo's Avatar
    Magoo is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    16,794
    Quote Originally Posted by Starkravinloon View Post
    Sounding a "racy" this morning Mags...You sure do start early...
    pardon me I have a hard time readin through all these posts I had no idea Rush was so popular.
    You had some nice ones

  7. #97
    Toby's Avatar
    Toby is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    44,192
    Quote Originally Posted by Northern Flash View Post
    Then the fight needs to taken up with the insurance companies......not the Govt. And as far as I'm concerned, if the birth control is required for medical purposes, her doctor should be able to get it authorized through the insurance company......labeled as a "medical necessity". If the insurance companies won't pay it, fight them in court. Keep the Govt. out of it.
    If it labeled as a medical necessity there are already laws on the books that mandates that the insurance covers it Flash.. May have to pay a co pay but it would be covered.. My ex worked for Catholic Charities, her insurance covered it..
    Northern Flash likes this.

  8. #98
    Toby's Avatar
    Toby is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    44,192
    Quote Originally Posted by Starkravinloon View Post
    Did Barry blast Rush?

    No just a friendly call between community organizers..
    dcmilkwagon likes this.

  9. #99
    Magoo's Avatar
    Magoo is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    16,794
    Quote Originally Posted by dcmilkwagon View Post
    Now that I have had a good nights rest I will submit that R-14 did not post the entire hearing. Here is the entire hearing from c-span's video files;

    http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/HealthandC

    Throughout the entire hearing birth control and unfettered access to such is the driving topic. Law Student Reproductive Justice, (LSRJ), has been planning a move such as this for several years. They knew that they were too late to get someone in front of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee last week. They also knew that Sandra Fluke had no other credentials or expertise in the matters that were being debated last week other than that she is a female, ( this is just my assumption, I don't want to upset the gays, lesbians and trans-sexuals here), my teenage daughter has as much expertise in womens health as Miss Fluke does. However, they also knew that they did have the political conections to get someone in front of the House Democratic Steering and Policy Committee. They knew they had Nancy Pelosi's ear, and knew that they could get someone in front of C-Spans cameras.

    I stand by my original conviction that this brew-ha-ha is nothing more than an attempt to get free contraception, for anyone who wants it, put into Obama's healthcare plan. The most expedient way of getting birthcontrol and birthcontrol products put into the list of coverages in Obamacare, is to make sure before Obamacare takes effect in 2014, the public is used to having that service before 2014. Once a product or service has been "given" to an entitlement minded society, it is extremely hard, or impossible, to take it away from them. So to make sure that society has this, they, (Obamas followers), wants to force the insurance companies to provide coverage and FREE, that's right they want all contraceptive devices, ie: condoms, BC pills, morning after pills, for free, to anybody who wants or asks for them.

    Sandra Fluke is a willing accomplist in this political action group known as Law Student Reproductive Justice. She may even be on the payroll of LSRJ through their fellowship program, I have no proof that she is recieving monatary assistance, but the organization does pay interns to do the sort of service that she is providing for them right now. I submit this as proof from LSRJ's own website:



    Law Students for Reproductive Justice (page 33).

    My original postings may have been crass and a little bit over the top, but I will not, and cannot, appologize for the things I have said. I also will not, and cannot, compromise my root feelings, beliefs and convictions in the political arena. It is my full belief that the Progressive Liberals want to take complete control of every aspect of our lives in this nation. I will not appologize, nor compromise, with those that are so willing to give up their freedoms to the modern-day slave owners and traders known as Progressive Liberals. Why on earth would people willing allow themselves to become slaves to another group of people? I don't understand the thought process that would allow this. I want the freedom to prosper, or fail, in my life on my own terms and on my own merits and talents. I will not be a slave to government. The President, Congress, and the Courts are supposed to work for us, to protect the rights and freedoms of ALL it's citizens, not just a select few.
    Ive got to hand it to you when you look in the dictionary for Male chauvinist pig,dcmilkwagon is the number 1. definition.
    LOL

  10. #100
    NPME is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    15
    Quote Originally Posted by Stoney View Post
    She's making her sex life pubic, why not?
    Stoney, this woman never talked about her own sex life. Without doubletalk, twisting the facts and taking things out of context please tell me exactly what she said that had anything to do with her own sex life.


Page 10 of 60 FirstFirst ... 8910111220 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:10 PM.
Powered by vBulletin™
Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Image resizer by SevenSkins
vBulletin Skin By: PurevB.com