Truckingboards Truck Drivers Forum

Truckingboards Fax Line (Toll Free)(888) 316-2554

 

 

 

                                                                                                                               


Go Back   Truckingboards Truck Drivers Forum > UNOFFICIAL LTL TRUCKING COMPANY FORUMS > CON-WAY FREIGHT
  Contact/Privacy/Help Trucking Jobs   Facebook  Twitter   Add Your Link   Casino


Forum Stats
Members: 24,379
Threads: 59,500
Posts: 706,232
Total Online: 179

Newest Member: Hot Sauce


 


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 11-02-2009, 02:35 AM
Knucklehead
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 22
vitocorleone99 is a jewel in the roughvitocorleone99 is a jewel in the roughvitocorleone99 is a jewel in the roughvitocorleone99 is a jewel in the rough
Default

That rumor has circulated among the CFI drivers' lounges since about five minutes after the merger. It's based largely on the notion that Con-way is somehow behind on payments to the former owners of CFI, allowing those former owners to re-claim the company. The genius part of the rumor is the fact that those spreading it are apparently unaware that Con-way was never making payments to the former owners, as many of you have lamented in discussions of the bridge loan and subsequent financing vehicles.

Some others:

The old CFI is opening in Tulsa as part of Melton.

Con-way wanted to give us a five cent raise, but the CFI brass made it one cent. We're getting the other four cents on {insert an upcoming date here}.

We're all going to have to load our own trailers on Con-way linehaul loads beginning on {insert an upcoming date here}.

We're being required to get 'T' endorsements.

{Insert bizarre number or percentage here} drivers have quit because everything sucks now that Con-way owns the company.

Herb Schmidt is leaving the company to run for mayor of Joplin. (This one goes back even further than the merger.)

All solo drivers will be forced to run as teams.

I'm sure there are more.


I can tell you how at least one CFI driver likes his job now as a Con-way employee. The logo on the doors of the trucks is a little prettier, I suppose. Other than that nothing has really changed.

The trucks were going to be turned down anyway. Anyone who didn't see the writing on the wall when fuel was $4.50 a gallon is a moron.

It's hard to say with any specificity, but I think that the health insurance options got marginally better for us. My cost (individual) went up by a couple bucks a week, as one would expect each year with or without a new corporate boss.

The 401(k) match was improved, then taken away. I guess, since the Truckload end has remained profitable, the argument could be made that we wouldn't have lost this if we were still CFI. Given the overall climate of the industry though, I would expect that we would have lost it anyhow.

We got a penny raise while our holiday pay, safety bonus, and vacation stayed the same. Our drop pay and detention were improved slightly. Miles were certainly down at the start of last year, but again this seemed to be an industry-wide issue rather than a Con-way one. To be perfectly honest, if nobody had ever told me that we were sold, I wouldn't have seen any reason to suspect that CFI had changed at all over the last couple of years. Companies adjust little things here and there as time goes on and CFI always did as well, before Con-way bought the company.

One thing to keep in mind when these conversations arise - OTR drivers are, in general, some of the most dishonest and bitter people on the planet. I haven't figured out if this job makes people that way or if it simply attracts people who are already that way. I live by myself with very few responsibilities and I have a short attention span, so I tend to get a kick out of the randomness of it all. Maybe these guys with families and such are just miserable with the experience in general. I don't know. Anyhow, since we're believing what Truckload drivers say now, I have this bridge to sell...

One other note regarding the "goodwill impairment" taken earlier this year. Before I got fed up with people and ran away to be a truck driver, I worked in the financial world. My sense at the time of the earnings report was that the company saw an opportunity during a bad quarter to make an adjustment for the new 'perceived' market value of CFI. If they had done it in a decent quarter it would have stood out more. Since they did it at a time when the whole industry was cutting left and right, it wasn't shocking to any analysts. Now, going forward, the return on equity will look better to the shareholders since they'll still bank whatever earnings are reported, but they'll do so with a company that is 'worth' less money. This isn't official or anything. Just my take on the report when it came out. The hard assets obviously didn't go anywhere, but a little accounting gimmick might make some people look smarter down the road.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook!
Reply With Quote

  #14 (permalink)  
Old 11-02-2009, 10:31 AM
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: In my own little wor
Posts: 187
knucklebuster1 has a spectacular aura aboutknucklebuster1 has a spectacular aura about
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mechanic1 View Post
Just recently they entered all Con-way Truckload units into our computer system so that we can punch on them and do repairs. They are scheduling in repairs in our shops and rolling in new shops through next year adding a few at a time. Our shops are adding parts to stock for there units too. I could not see them doing this if there was any intention to dump them. The way I see it, we are becoming more integrated with them on the maintenance side, so I take it as all rumor.
thats exactly what i was going to say we start doing pms on their trucks the end of this month.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook!
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 11-02-2009, 11:22 AM
Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: East
Posts: 220
DanSullivan is a glorious beacon of lightDanSullivan is a glorious beacon of lightDanSullivan is a glorious beacon of lightDanSullivan is a glorious beacon of lightDanSullivan is a glorious beacon of light
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vitocorleone99 View Post
That rumor has circulated among the CFI drivers' lounges since about five minutes after the merger. It's based largely on the notion that Con-way is somehow behind on payments to the former owners of CFI, allowing those former owners to re-claim the company. The genius part of the rumor is the fact that those spreading it are apparently unaware that Con-way was never making payments to the former owners, as many of you have lamented in discussions of the bridge loan and subsequent financing vehicles.

Some others:

The old CFI is opening in Tulsa as part of Melton.

Con-way wanted to give us a five cent raise, but the CFI brass made it one cent. We're getting the other four cents on {insert an upcoming date here}.

We're all going to have to load our own trailers on Con-way linehaul loads beginning on {insert an upcoming date here}.

We're being required to get 'T' endorsements.

{Insert bizarre number or percentage here} drivers have quit because everything sucks now that Con-way owns the company.

Herb Schmidt is leaving the company to run for mayor of Joplin. (This one goes back even further than the merger.)

All solo drivers will be forced to run as teams.

I'm sure there are more.


I can tell you how at least one CFI driver likes his job now as a Con-way employee. The logo on the doors of the trucks is a little prettier, I suppose. Other than that nothing has really changed.

The trucks were going to be turned down anyway. Anyone who didn't see the writing on the wall when fuel was $4.50 a gallon is a moron.

It's hard to say with any specificity, but I think that the health insurance options got marginally better for us. My cost (individual) went up by a couple bucks a week, as one would expect each year with or without a new corporate boss.

The 401(k) match was improved, then taken away. I guess, since the Truckload end has remained profitable, the argument could be made that we wouldn't have lost this if we were still CFI. Given the overall climate of the industry though, I would expect that we would have lost it anyhow.

We got a penny raise while our holiday pay, safety bonus, and vacation stayed the same. Our drop pay and detention were improved slightly. Miles were certainly down at the start of last year, but again this seemed to be an industry-wide issue rather than a Con-way one. To be perfectly honest, if nobody had ever told me that we were sold, I wouldn't have seen any reason to suspect that CFI had changed at all over the last couple of years. Companies adjust little things here and there as time goes on and CFI always did as well, before Con-way bought the company.

One thing to keep in mind when these conversations arise - OTR drivers are, in general, some of the most dishonest and bitter people on the planet. I haven't figured out if this job makes people that way or if it simply attracts people who are already that way. I live by myself with very few responsibilities and I have a short attention span, so I tend to get a kick out of the randomness of it all. Maybe these guys with families and such are just miserable with the experience in general. I don't know. Anyhow, since we're believing what Truckload drivers say now, I have this bridge to sell...

One other note regarding the "goodwill impairment" taken earlier this year. Before I got fed up with people and ran away to be a truck driver, I worked in the financial world. My sense at the time of the earnings report was that the company saw an opportunity during a bad quarter to make an adjustment for the new 'perceived' market value of CFI. If they had done it in a decent quarter it would have stood out more. Since they did it at a time when the whole industry was cutting left and right, it wasn't shocking to any analysts. Now, going forward, the return on equity will look better to the shareholders since they'll still bank whatever earnings are reported, but they'll do so with a company that is 'worth' less money. This isn't official or anything. Just my take on the report when it came out. The hard assets obviously didn't go anywhere, but a little accounting gimmick might make some people look smarter down the road.
Godfather, you are the man. Probably the most intelligent post I have ever read on T.B. We are not worthy. Accounting gimmicks indeed, such a murky business.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook!
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 11-02-2009, 11:27 AM
Byronic hero
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: tristan da cunha
Posts: 6,643
wonderring99 has a reputation beyond reputewonderring99 has a reputation beyond reputewonderring99 has a reputation beyond reputewonderring99 has a reputation beyond reputewonderring99 has a reputation beyond reputewonderring99 has a reputation beyond reputewonderring99 has a reputation beyond reputewonderring99 has a reputation beyond reputewonderring99 has a reputation beyond reputewonderring99 has a reputation beyond reputewonderring99 has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DanSullivan View Post
Godfather, you are the man. Probably the most intelligent post I have ever read on T.B. We are not worthy. Accounting gimmicks indeed, such a murky business.
That was(is) an outstanding post ...makes alot of sense if you read the reports and understand the accounting gimmicks ...
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook!
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 11-02-2009, 11:29 AM
Seasoned Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Skid Row
Posts: 703
Blue67 is a splendid one to beholdBlue67 is a splendid one to beholdBlue67 is a splendid one to beholdBlue67 is a splendid one to beholdBlue67 is a splendid one to beholdBlue67 is a splendid one to beholdBlue67 is a splendid one to behold
Default

Truckload is not going anywhere......just going to get bigger.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook!
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 11-02-2009, 11:40 AM
Seasoned Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: confusion
Posts: 1,244
av8tor has a reputation beyond reputeav8tor has a reputation beyond reputeav8tor has a reputation beyond reputeav8tor has a reputation beyond reputeav8tor has a reputation beyond reputeav8tor has a reputation beyond reputeav8tor has a reputation beyond reputeav8tor has a reputation beyond reputeav8tor has a reputation beyond reputeav8tor has a reputation beyond reputeav8tor has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue67 View Post
Truckload is not going anywhere......just going to get bigger.
And........take a larger, and larger percentage of the freight that used to move in pups, with Freight employees, along with it. There are lanes now that "purchase" transportation moves very close to 100% of the freight, and the distance is less than 250 miles. If I read the other companies boards correctely, most if not all of the LTL companies, are beginning to follow this model. The only place Truckload is going, is to your yard, with your freight, instead of you.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook!
Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
vB.Sponsors
Advertisement System V2.5 By   Branden