<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>Truckingboards Truck Drivers Forum</title>
		<link>http://www.truckingboards.com/trucking/upload</link>
		<description>This is a heated arena to debate the advantages and disadvantages of working for a Union.</description>
		<language>en</language>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 04:07:30 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>vBulletin</generator>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Deregulation/Regulation Pro's and Con's Please]]></title>
			<link>http://www.truckingboards.com/trucking/upload/teamsters-non-union-debate-forum/71433-deregulation-regulation-pros-cons-please.html</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 13:10:28 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[When the trucking industry was deregulated, I was too young to understand the impact it had.  I would like very much if a few of you "salty dogs"...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>When the trucking industry was deregulated, I was too young to understand the impact it had.  I would like very much if a few of you &quot;salty dogs&quot; would offer your opinions as to how deregulation affected the industry in the past and how re-regulation would affect it today.  Thank You.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.truckingboards.com/trucking/upload/teamsters-non-union-debate-forum/">TEAMSTERS / NON-UNION DEBATE FORUM</category>
			<dc:creator>ldgarrit</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.truckingboards.com/trucking/upload/teamsters-non-union-debate-forum/71433-deregulation-regulation-pros-cons-please.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Pat R.</title>
			<link>http://www.truckingboards.com/trucking/upload/teamsters-non-union-debate-forum/71362-pat-r.html</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 12:15:10 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[I heard that there were meetings in S. Cal with Pat R. on Tuesday. Anyone hear of anything? Everyone invited. Don't know if there are more meetings...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>I heard that there were meetings in S. Cal with Pat R. on Tuesday. Anyone hear of anything? Everyone invited. Don't know if there are more meetings planned (if there were any in the first place), or if they are going to cover all areas. <br />
<br />
Are there more problems in the S. Cal area than elsewhere?</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.truckingboards.com/trucking/upload/teamsters-non-union-debate-forum/">TEAMSTERS / NON-UNION DEBATE FORUM</category>
			<dc:creator>Franklin</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.truckingboards.com/trucking/upload/teamsters-non-union-debate-forum/71362-pat-r.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Standard Forwarding trying to break union?</title>
			<link>http://www.truckingboards.com/trucking/upload/teamsters-non-union-debate-forum/71320-standard-forwarding-trying-break-union.html</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:58:04 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>I hear Standard Forwarding filed bankruptcy and are reorganizing.  They are bragging about how they are going to break the union.  Can they do that?</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>I hear Standard Forwarding filed bankruptcy and are reorganizing.  They are bragging about how they are going to break the union.  Can they do that?</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.truckingboards.com/trucking/upload/teamsters-non-union-debate-forum/">TEAMSTERS / NON-UNION DEBATE FORUM</category>
			<dc:creator>lookingup</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.truckingboards.com/trucking/upload/teamsters-non-union-debate-forum/71320-standard-forwarding-trying-break-union.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>This can not be Good for the Industry</title>
			<link>http://www.truckingboards.com/trucking/upload/teamsters-non-union-debate-forum/71293-can-not-good-industry.html</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 04:00:13 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Trucker ABF, Teamsters in Concession Talks | Journal of Commerce (http://www.joc.com/node/414701)</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://www.joc.com/node/414701" target="_blank">Trucker ABF, Teamsters in Concession Talks | Journal of Commerce</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.truckingboards.com/trucking/upload/teamsters-non-union-debate-forum/">TEAMSTERS / NON-UNION DEBATE FORUM</category>
			<dc:creator>ls57racer</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.truckingboards.com/trucking/upload/teamsters-non-union-debate-forum/71293-can-not-good-industry.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>UPS vs. FEDEX: Ultimate Whiteboard Remix</title>
			<link>http://www.truckingboards.com/trucking/upload/teamsters-non-union-debate-forum/71250-ups-vs-fedex-ultimate-whiteboard-remix.html</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:14:57 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>UPS vs. FEDEX: Ultimate Whiteboard Remix 
 
QzZ0nz7XVFo 
 
 
 
Image: http://img689.imageshack.us/img689/1001/iconupsvsfedex.jpg  
Better Trades...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>UPS vs. FEDEX: Ultimate Whiteboard Remix<br />
<br />
<object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/QzZ0nz7XVFo"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/QzZ0nz7XVFo" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="350"></embed></object><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<img src="http://img689.imageshack.us/img689/1001/iconupsvsfedex.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<a href="http://www.better-trades.com/stock-reviews/stock-battles/ups-vs-fedex/1-company-info.asp" target="_blank">Better Trades Stock Battles: UPS vs. FedEx</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.truckingboards.com/trucking/upload/teamsters-non-union-debate-forum/">TEAMSTERS / NON-UNION DEBATE FORUM</category>
			<dc:creator>Dockworker</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.truckingboards.com/trucking/upload/teamsters-non-union-debate-forum/71250-ups-vs-fedex-ultimate-whiteboard-remix.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Teamster Carhaul Thinning</title>
			<link>http://www.truckingboards.com/trucking/upload/teamsters-non-union-debate-forum/71238-teamster-carhaul-thinning.html</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:19:30 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Chrysler spokeswoman Shawn Morgan says the automaker has shifted about 28% of its carhaul business. Chrysler has been spending $111 million annually...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Chrysler spokeswoman Shawn Morgan says the automaker has shifted about 28% of its carhaul business. Chrysler has been spending $111 million annually to haul cars, but says that cost will eventually diminish by $31 million annually as a result of its vendor shift on select routes. <br />
<br />
<a href="http://news.google.com/news/url?fd=R&amp;sa=T&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thestreet.com%2Fstory%2F10627142%2F1%2Fteamsters-we-got-shaft-on-car-haul.html%3Fcm_ven%3DGOOGLEFI&amp;usg=AFQjCNFWF_ncDTzz6Tsy7LnDLlHeTZVZvQ" target="_blank">Teamsters: We Got Shaft on Car Haul | Automakers | Financial Articles &amp; Investing News | TheStreet.com</a><br />
<br />
<br />
and<br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://ca.wrs.yahoo.com/_ylt=A0oG75XKhAJL.6UA9uHrFAx.;_ylu=X3oDMTBybnZlZnRlBHNlYwNzcgRwb3MDMQRjb2xvA2FjMgR2dGlkAw--/SIG=11fthlnr9/EXP=1258542666/**http%3a//carbuyersbeware.com/" target="_blank">Car Buyers Beware</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.truckingboards.com/trucking/upload/teamsters-non-union-debate-forum/">TEAMSTERS / NON-UNION DEBATE FORUM</category>
			<dc:creator>Canadian</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.truckingboards.com/trucking/upload/teamsters-non-union-debate-forum/71238-teamster-carhaul-thinning.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Are Labor Unions too Powerful?</title>
			<link>http://www.truckingboards.com/trucking/upload/teamsters-non-union-debate-forum/71153-labor-unions-too-powerful.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 19:07:46 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[The Myth That Won't Die 
 
I thought some of you might like to read this  
International Union of Elevator Constructors Local 2...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>The Myth That Won't Die<br />
<br />
I thought some of you might like to read this <br />
<a href="http://www.iuec2.com/index.cfm?zone=/unionactive/view_article.cfm&amp;HomeID=144060" target="_blank">International Union of Elevator Constructors Local 2</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.truckingboards.com/trucking/upload/teamsters-non-union-debate-forum/">TEAMSTERS / NON-UNION DEBATE FORUM</category>
			<dc:creator>iceomatic</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.truckingboards.com/trucking/upload/teamsters-non-union-debate-forum/71153-labor-unions-too-powerful.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Cuts Cuts and more Cuts!!!!!!!!</title>
			<link>http://www.truckingboards.com/trucking/upload/teamsters-non-union-debate-forum/70991-cuts-cuts-more-cuts.html</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:28:49 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[:USA:With all the union companys losing money in this economy ,mostly YRC.The non-union carriers are taking all the benefit's away sick days ,holiday...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>:USA:With all the union companys losing money in this economy ,mostly YRC.The non-union carriers are taking all the benefit's away sick days ,holiday pay, and 401's matches . What does all this mean for the future of the LTL pay ,and benefit's we all enjoyed ? I beleave all the fear of union oganizing in this companies is gone .</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.truckingboards.com/trucking/upload/teamsters-non-union-debate-forum/">TEAMSTERS / NON-UNION DEBATE FORUM</category>
			<dc:creator>macandb</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.truckingboards.com/trucking/upload/teamsters-non-union-debate-forum/70991-cuts-cuts-more-cuts.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>YRC said it likely will file for bankruptcy if offering fails ????</title>
			<link>http://www.truckingboards.com/trucking/upload/teamsters-non-union-debate-forum/70909-yrc-said-likely-will-file-bankruptcy-if-offering-fails.html</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:03:41 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Ohio.com - YRC makes debt-exchange offer (http://www.ohio.com/news/break_news/69609632.html) 
 
 
hope these guys can pull it off</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://www.ohio.com/news/break_news/69609632.html" target="_blank">Ohio.com - YRC makes debt-exchange offer</a><br />
<br />
<br />
hope these guys can pull it off</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.truckingboards.com/trucking/upload/teamsters-non-union-debate-forum/">TEAMSTERS / NON-UNION DEBATE FORUM</category>
			<dc:creator>truck-driver</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.truckingboards.com/trucking/upload/teamsters-non-union-debate-forum/70909-yrc-said-likely-will-file-bankruptcy-if-offering-fails.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>just wondering what Fed-East is doing</title>
			<link>http://www.truckingboards.com/trucking/upload/teamsters-non-union-debate-forum/70815-just-wondering-what-fed-east-doing.html</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 04:02:41 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>I am not sure if this is the correct forum for this question so if not please relocate to the correct forum.  I have been out to South Calf here...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>I am not sure if this is the correct forum for this question so if not please relocate to the correct forum.  I have been out to South Calf here lately and have seen a LOT of pro-union signs and people holding up signs in front of terminals. Fed-ex Frt  is going or is in the process of being forced to respect with honor their employees? While the top senority drivers in any company almost always think &quot;they&quot; are being treated great the great majority of workers fall into the 3-10 year time frame. Is this just a &quot;west&quot; coast thing or is it going thru the whole freight system?  Just wondering.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.truckingboards.com/trucking/upload/teamsters-non-union-debate-forum/">TEAMSTERS / NON-UNION DEBATE FORUM</category>
			<dc:creator>Wiredone</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.truckingboards.com/trucking/upload/teamsters-non-union-debate-forum/70815-just-wondering-what-fed-east-doing.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Is Con-Way Sinking ABF & YRC?]]></title>
			<link>http://www.truckingboards.com/trucking/upload/teamsters-non-union-debate-forum/70751-con-way-sinking-abf-yrc.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 15:03:21 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[I hate to be redundant but is it just me?  
 
 
 
---Quote--- 
Less-than-truckload carrier*_ Con-way says it moved toward "more aggressive" price...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>I hate to be redundant but is it just me? <br />
<br />
<br />
<div style="margin:20px; margin-top:5px; ">
	<div class="smallfont" style="margin-bottom:2px">Quote:</div>
	<table cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="100%">
	<tr>
		<td class="alt2">
			<hr />
			
				Less-than-truckload carrier<b><i><u> Con-way says it moved toward &quot;more aggressive&quot; price discounting in the third quarter than it normally uses and started hiring back workers to cope with tonnage gains.</u></i></b>
			
			<hr />
		</td>
	</tr>
	</table>
</div><br />
<font face="Arial Black"><b><div style="margin:20px; margin-top:5px; ">
	<div class="smallfont" style="margin-bottom:2px">Quote:</div>
	<table cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="100%">
	<tr>
		<td class="alt2">
			<hr />
			
				Much of the growth probably came at the expense of competitors, including troubled LTL giant YRC Worldwide. But it came at a high price. Operating income decreased 62.7 percent and yield was down 10.5 percent, excluding fuel surcharges. Including fuel surcharges, revenue per hundredweight was down 19.4 percent, a steeper decline than was seen at ABF Freight System, FedEx Freight or YRC.
			
			<hr />
		</td>
	</tr>
	</table>
</div> </b></font></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.truckingboards.com/trucking/upload/teamsters-non-union-debate-forum/">TEAMSTERS / NON-UNION DEBATE FORUM</category>
			<dc:creator>thejoe</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.truckingboards.com/trucking/upload/teamsters-non-union-debate-forum/70751-con-way-sinking-abf-yrc.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[I guess Union Solidarity doesn't apply.]]></title>
			<link>http://www.truckingboards.com/trucking/upload/teamsters-non-union-debate-forum/70681-i-guess-union-solidarity-doesnt-apply.html</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 04:12:15 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[I heard that UPSF took another of YRCW's big accounts, Mo Valley Books.  I guess FedEx isn't the only one on the attack.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>I heard that UPSF took another of YRCW's big accounts, Mo Valley Books.  I guess FedEx isn't the only one on the attack.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.truckingboards.com/trucking/upload/teamsters-non-union-debate-forum/">TEAMSTERS / NON-UNION DEBATE FORUM</category>
			<dc:creator>Guardrail</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.truckingboards.com/trucking/upload/teamsters-non-union-debate-forum/70681-i-guess-union-solidarity-doesnt-apply.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>UPS, FedEx fire shots at each other from their trenches in New Mexico</title>
			<link>http://www.truckingboards.com/trucking/upload/teamsters-non-union-debate-forum/70278-ups-fedex-fire-shots-each-other-their-trenches-new-mexico.html</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 02:38:53 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>---Quote--- 
On Tuesday, the two opponents finally met face-to-face at a meeting of the Albuquerque Chamber of Commerce. 
---End Quote--- 
...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><div style="margin:20px; margin-top:5px; ">
	<div class="smallfont" style="margin-bottom:2px">Quote:</div>
	<table cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="100%">
	<tr>
		<td class="alt2">
			<hr />
			
				On Tuesday, the two opponents finally met face-to-face at a meeting of the Albuquerque Chamber of Commerce.
			
			<hr />
		</td>
	</tr>
	</table>
</div><div style="margin:20px; margin-top:5px; ">
	<div class="smallfont" style="margin-bottom:2px">Quote:</div>
	<table cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="100%">
	<tr>
		<td class="alt2">
			<hr />
			
				UPS thinks it was a battle in a war to protect the rights of America's workers; FedEx thinks it was a battle over its right to conduct business without unfair government intervention. In truth, it's about money, although it hinges on a fairly obscure legal classification that dates back to 1926.
			
			<hr />
		</td>
	</tr>
	</table>
</div><div style="margin:20px; margin-top:5px; ">
	<div class="smallfont" style="margin-bottom:2px">Quote:</div>
	<table cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="100%">
	<tr>
		<td class="alt2">
			<hr />
			
				For all its drama, the UPS v. FedEx skirmish in New Mexico was largely meaningless. Until the Senate version of the act is rewritten, this issue is stalled -- the bill is bogged down in committee, and it's unclear when it will find its way off the floor of the Senate. So for now, FedEx retains its financial advantage, with employees who have fewer rights to strike.
			
			<hr />
		</td>
	</tr>
	</table>
</div><img src="http://i33.tinypic.com/4ina8l.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/10/29/ups-fedex-fire-shots-at-each-other-from-their-trenches-in-new-m/" target="_blank">UPS, FedEx fire shots at each other from their trenches in New Mexico</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.truckingboards.com/trucking/upload/teamsters-non-union-debate-forum/">TEAMSTERS / NON-UNION DEBATE FORUM</category>
			<dc:creator>Dockworker</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.truckingboards.com/trucking/upload/teamsters-non-union-debate-forum/70278-ups-fedex-fire-shots-each-other-their-trenches-new-mexico.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>UPS, FedEx fire shots at each other from their trenches in New Mexico</title>
			<link>http://www.truckingboards.com/trucking/upload/teamsters-non-union-debate-forum/70276-ups-fedex-fire-shots-each-other-their-trenches-new-mexico.html</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 02:38:53 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>---Quote--- 
On Tuesday, the two opponents finally met face-to-face at a meeting of the Albuquerque Chamber of Commerce. 
---End Quote--- 
...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><div style="margin:20px; margin-top:5px; ">
	<div class="smallfont" style="margin-bottom:2px">Quote:</div>
	<table cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="100%">
	<tr>
		<td class="alt2">
			<hr />
			
				On Tuesday, the two opponents finally met face-to-face at a meeting of the Albuquerque Chamber of Commerce.
			
			<hr />
		</td>
	</tr>
	</table>
</div><div style="margin:20px; margin-top:5px; ">
	<div class="smallfont" style="margin-bottom:2px">Quote:</div>
	<table cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="100%">
	<tr>
		<td class="alt2">
			<hr />
			
				UPS thinks it was a battle in a war to protect the rights of America's workers; FedEx thinks it was a battle over its right to conduct business without unfair government intervention. In truth, it's about money, although it hinges on a fairly obscure legal classification that dates back to 1926.
			
			<hr />
		</td>
	</tr>
	</table>
</div><div style="margin:20px; margin-top:5px; ">
	<div class="smallfont" style="margin-bottom:2px">Quote:</div>
	<table cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="100%">
	<tr>
		<td class="alt2">
			<hr />
			
				For all its drama, the UPS v. FedEx skirmish in New Mexico was largely meaningless. Until the Senate version of the act is rewritten, this issue is stalled -- the bill is bogged down in committee, and it's unclear when it will find its way off the floor of the Senate. So for now, FedEx retains its financial advantage, with employees who have fewer rights to strike.
			
			<hr />
		</td>
	</tr>
	</table>
</div><img src="http://i33.tinypic.com/4ina8l.jpg" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/10/29/ups-fedex-fire-shots-at-each-other-from-their-trenches-in-new-m/" target="_blank">UPS, FedEx fire shots at each other from their trenches in New Mexico</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.truckingboards.com/trucking/upload/teamsters-non-union-debate-forum/">TEAMSTERS / NON-UNION DEBATE FORUM</category>
			<dc:creator>Dockworker</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.truckingboards.com/trucking/upload/teamsters-non-union-debate-forum/70276-ups-fedex-fire-shots-each-other-their-trenches-new-mexico.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Why doesn't the Union stay the Hell out of it..]]></title>
			<link>http://www.truckingboards.com/trucking/upload/teamsters-non-union-debate-forum/70237-why-doesnt-union-stay-hell-out.html</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 05:13:14 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[By popular demand I'm throwing this out for everyone to have a shot at.... 
 
What does the union have against the 11 hour rule and 34 hr...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>By popular demand I'm throwing this out for everyone to have a shot at....<br />
<br />
What does the union have against the 11 hour rule and 34 hr reset.....If this comes to pass it is going to hurt many of us with long runs...:ranting2:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.joc.com/node/414232" target="_blank">DOT to Issue New Hours of Service Rule | Journal of Commerce</a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.dispatchpolitics.com/live/content/national_world/stories/2009/10/28/copy/Sleepy_truckers_1028.ART_ART_10-28-09_A7_RHFGFAN.html?type=rss&amp;cat=&amp;sid=101" target="_blank">Feds might shorten time truckers are allowed on road | Columbus Dispatch Politics</a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.ctl.ca/issues/ISArticle.asp?aid=1000346061" target="_blank">ctl.ca - CTL - 10/29/2009</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.truckingboards.com/trucking/upload/teamsters-non-union-debate-forum/">TEAMSTERS / NON-UNION DEBATE FORUM</category>
			<dc:creator>ls57racer</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.truckingboards.com/trucking/upload/teamsters-non-union-debate-forum/70237-why-doesnt-union-stay-hell-out.html</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
