Truckingboards Truck Drivers Forum

Truckingboards Fax Line (Toll Free)(888) 316-2554

 

 

 

                                                                                                                               


Go Back   Truckingboards Truck Drivers Forum > TRUCKINGBOARDS TRUCK DRIVER FORUMS > GENERAL TRUCK DRIVERS FORUM
  Contact/Privacy/Help Trucking Jobs   Facebook  Twitter   Add Your Link   Casino


Forum Stats
Members: 24,378
Threads: 59,512
Posts: 706,482
Total Online: 69

Newest Member: jicysmith


 


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-09-2008, 12:59 AM
# 1 Devil's Advocate
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: twixt here & there
Posts: 3,310
Blog Entries: 20
pro1driver has disabled reputation
Default Fmcsa-2004-19608-2528

go to: redirect

enter the document number (in my title line to this thread). (use capital letters FMCSA)

fill in the "comment or submission field"......OR, you may have to enter it in the "search" field.

go from there.

we have until Friday the 15th to respond


this is what i just submitted online moments ago:

I do believe that we as professional drivers should have these rules stay as-is. We are the only ones that actually know how to do our job each and every day. No citizens group should be able to control the trucking industry, regarding our rest, or our working hours per week. The "average american worker" can work over 40 pers week, and by week's end, get whatever rest that individual needs. The start of the new work week, entitles that "average worker" to start fresh, and earn/work as many hours as possible, with no citizen group or government involvement. Why should ANY citizen group interfere with our livelyhood? Do we as professional driver's interfere with the "average american worker"? To that, I respond, NO, we don't. The 34 hour reset ruling allows us to start fresh the new work week, and the 11 hours driving time is no more tiring than the 10 hours of driving time. We as professional driver's, are better trained and experienced than the "average american driver", who very frequently drives while drunk, stressed out, angry, tired, and is usually uneducated properly through schooling, in the safety of the roads, sharing those roads, vehicle safety equipment, laws of the roads in which state they live in, carry little or no insurance, and many times, drive on suspended licenses. Are we to be dictated by many of those individuals regarding safety on the road, when they are so inadequate themselves in such? Why does the U.S. Government seem to be so eager to listen to citizen groups about trucking, trucking laws, trucking rules, when these individuals in most cases, have no working knowledge of the trucking industry in of itself, and the overall importance of the industry? Wouldn't it be somewhat wiser to listen to those of us that actually have been properly trained and experienced? In closing, I suggest to you, to leave the current regulations/rules in effect. The "old" rules/regualtions were put into place decades ago for when times were different. We are now as you know, into the 21st century. we need to go forward, not backwards in time simply to satisfy citizens groups or individuals who only need to see themselves as "controlling" an industry they have absoultely no knowledge of from thier experience.
thank you

Last edited by pro1driver; 02-09-2008 at 01:03 AM. Reason: spelling errors
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook!
Reply With Quote

  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-09-2008, 01:24 AM
# 1 Devil's Advocate
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: twixt here & there
Posts: 3,310
Blog Entries: 20
pro1driver has disabled reputation
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pro1driver View Post
go to: redirect
sorry, mods, you gotta allow me to re-edit my post/thread. i have to add something.

why is ther a limit to a person editing his/her posts? this is not making any sense.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-09-2008, 10:25 AM
Seasoned Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: X
Posts: 4,535
CFer has a reputation beyond reputeCFer has a reputation beyond reputeCFer has a reputation beyond reputeCFer has a reputation beyond reputeCFer has a reputation beyond reputeCFer has a reputation beyond reputeCFer has a reputation beyond reputeCFer has a reputation beyond reputeCFer has a reputation beyond reputeCFer has a reputation beyond reputeCFer has a reputation beyond repute
Default

What do you want edited?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-09-2008, 11:43 AM
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Oregon
Posts: 429
RedRollingRoadblock has much to be proud ofRedRollingRoadblock has much to be proud ofRedRollingRoadblock has much to be proud ofRedRollingRoadblock has much to be proud ofRedRollingRoadblock has much to be proud ofRedRollingRoadblock has much to be proud ofRedRollingRoadblock has much to be proud ofRedRollingRoadblock has much to be proud of
Default

One thing that everyone may not know is that you do not have to fill in the personal information. You may give only part or none. I would guess that those with a name might be taken more seriously than those with out. Also they are bound by law to read all comments.

Keep your comments professional. Check spelling and punctuation. Don't use profane or vulgar language. Stick to the facts as you know or as they relate to your experience. Be specific on the parts that you agree/disagree with. You might take time to read the document before you start so you have an idea of what they are looking for. If sending by mail or fax you MUST have the Docket ID on the submission.

Landline Magazine has a link about this and how to submit comments at
http://www.landlinemag.com/Special_R...nts_on_HOS.htm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-09-2008, 12:30 PM
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Oregon
Posts: 429
RedRollingRoadblock has much to be proud ofRedRollingRoadblock has much to be proud ofRedRollingRoadblock has much to be proud ofRedRollingRoadblock has much to be proud ofRedRollingRoadblock has much to be proud ofRedRollingRoadblock has much to be proud ofRedRollingRoadblock has much to be proud ofRedRollingRoadblock has much to be proud of
Default

Personally I have mixed feelings about the proposed law. Why should anyone have to work eleven/fourteen/sixteen hours a day? Funny thing I have noticed is that carriers think you MUST work fourteen hours, not that you MAY.

The 11 hour driving rule has opened up some runs that were slightly over 10 hours and give me a chance to hold a bid that is more to my liking. I prefer to work to live not live to work.

I find it odd that the mega-carriers think that you chances of an accident decrease in the 11th hour but I don't think any of them say that "stopping the clock" for a nap or to avoid rush hour is a good idea. Using their logic a tired driver or one in heavy traffic should be the safest driver. I can still hear my mothers words "someday you will wish you could take a nap" ringing in my hollow head. Maybe we would have better laws out of Washington if they would take a nap once in a while instead of signing off on some of their stupid stuff.

The 10 hours off is a good thing. It gives a person time to tend to personal things and still gives time for a good sleep that fits your bodies needs be it 8 hours or 5 hours.

The sleeper provision (or lack of it) is wrong. Period. It has been at least 32 years since I ran sleeper and only had one partner that could sleep in a moving truck that long. (However it may have been the after effects of to much alcohol the night before.) I really doubt that any one follows the eight hours straight in the bunk rule. The "split sleeper" should be brought back.

I really don't think that a "one size fits all" rule is going to work this time around. It isn't the 1930's anymore.

Unless the law is put into the US code it will have court challenges and we will be going through this for another three years.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 02-09-2008, 02:49 PM
Lurker
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: kentucky
Posts: 51
dadforseven will become famous soon enoughdadforseven will become famous soon enough
Default

what i submitted.

Mr. Hill: The HOS as currently written contribute to unsafe working conditions.
No other occupation works 14 hours straight!
No required breaks and meal period are included in proposed HOS.
HOS currently promote employers to abuse the health and welfare of employees. i.e.(excessive wait times at shipper/receiver, unrealistic transit times, and insufficient rest stops)

My recommendation would be 12 hours on duty and 12 hours off duty, with a maximum of 60 hours in 7 days.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook!
Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 06:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
vB.Sponsors
Advertisement System V2.5 By   Branden