TRUCK DRIVERS…you have the right to refuse to drive in hazardous winter weather

[TruckersJustice]

Your Rights Under the STAA: Refusing to Drive Under Bad Weather

by Paul Taylor - Truckers Justice Center
(truckersjusticecenter.com)

Winter is now in full swing and truck drivers will face snow-covered, icy roads throughout the Plains, the Northeast and the West. At times, they will face the decision of whether or not it is safe to drive. Of course, the driver’s decision may differ from his dispatcher’s decision. When this conflict arises it is generally the driver’s decision that will legally control who is right and who is wrong.

The United States Code of Federal Regulations [49 C.F.R. §392.14] provides in pertinent part as follows:

Hazardous conditions; extreme caution. Extreme caution in the operation of a commercial motor vehicle shall be exercised when hazardous conditions, such as those caused by snow, ice, sleet, fog, mist, rain, dust, or smoke, adversely affect visibility or traction. Speed shall be reduced when such conditions exist. If conditions become sufficiently dangerous, the operation of the commercial motor vehicle shall be discontinued and shall not be resumed until the commercial motor vehicle can be safely operated.

This regulation does not provide a clear test for when a driver shall discontinue operations due to bad weather.

The Surface Transportation Assistance Act (known as the STAA) prohibits an employer from disciplining or firing a commercial driver because that driver refuses to drive a commercial motor vehicle on the highways in violation of Federal safety regulations. The STAA also prohibits an employer from disciplining or firing a commercial driver because that driver refuses to operate a commercial vehicle when he has a “reasonable apprehension” of serious injury to himself or the public because of the vehicle’s unsafe condition.

When a driver claims that he has been wrongfully disciplined or fired in violation of the STAA, his case may be heard by officials of the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL). The DOL has decided only a handful of cases where a driver has been fired for refusing to drive due to bad weather.

In Cleary v. Flint Ink, Corp. (1996), a driver refused a dispatch scheduled to depart at midnight. On the morning of his scheduled departure, the driver saw the beginnings of a major snowstorm. He watched a televised weather report predicting heavy snowfall for the area of his scheduled run. The driver telephoned his supervisor at 8:15 a.m. and asked to have his run postponed. Not surprisingly the supervisor told the driver he could not delay his run, but gave him the option to leave immediately. The driver refused and reiterated his refusal to leave at midnight. Ultimately the driver was fired for his refusal to drive.

The Secretary of Labor upheld the firing. While acknowledging that a driver is protected when he refuses to drive due to adverse weather conditions, the Secretary found that the driver’s refusal to drive in the Cleary case was not reasonable under the circumstances. In ruling for the employer the Secretary of Labor stated:

“Given the evidence presented and the changing nature of the weather it was not reasonable to assume that the roads would be unnavigable 16 hours after [the driver’s] decision not to drive. Cleary should have waited until later in the day to observe the progress of the storm and make his decision based upon the most recent information available.”

In the case of Robinson v. Duff Truck Line, Inc. (1993), a motor carrier fired a driver because the driver did not even attempt to drive in what he claimed was bad weather. The carrier argued that the language in the regulations that says “the operation of the commercial motor vehicle shall be discontinued” when weather is sufficiently hazardous meant that the driver must at least start a run before refusing to drive due to hazardous weather.

The driver, Robinson, testified that television stations issued weather warnings advising against driving on the highways which were on his route due to icy conditions. Based on this he refused to drive and the carrier fired him.

The Secretary of Labor rejected the carrier’s argument that a driver must at least begin his run before he can refuse to drive due to bad weather, stating that it would create an absurd situation of drivers being compelled to take their vehicles at least out of the terminal gate.

Sleet, Rain and Snow

Eash v. Roadway Express, Inc. (2001) was a case before the U. S. Department of Labor wherein the employee, Larry Eash, refused a dispatch based on inclement weather. Eash was assigned to a bid between Copley,Ohio and Pittsburgh. When Eash woke on Jan. 14, 1999, he saw sleet and rain mixed with snow outside his home. Weather reports on the local radio station indicated that freezing rain was moving east toward Wooster,Ohio. A television news report indicated that driving was dangerous in western Pennsylvania and eastern Ohio. Eash observed freezing rain outside his home. He continued to monitor television and radio weather reports which advised against travel due to snow and freezing rain.

Several times during the day that Eash was scheduled to work, he called the employer and attempted to be relieved of his work responsibilities due to bad weather. Eash advised the persons that he spoke with that he believed the weather conditions made driving dangerous. His employer ignored his requests to be relieved from work until the inclement weather conditions cleared.

Eash left his home in his personal vehicle and began the 20-plus mile drive to Roadway’s terminal at Copley,Ohio. As he attempted to drive to work, freezing rain accumulated on his windshield, window glass and outside mirrors; he could barely see the road ahead of him because of the accumulated ice on the windshield. He could not view the side mirrors on his car because of the accumulated ice, and lost control of his vehicle at one point after driving about six miles from home.

He then called Roadway and told the dispatcher on duty that he was not going to report to work because driving conditions were dangerous. Roadway issued a “Letter of Warning” to Eash for his “Failure to report to work after accepting a work call on 1/14/99 at 19:55.”

An Administrative Law Judge of the DOL found that Eash “failed to establish that the type of weather conditions existed that would have made it unsafe to operate a commercial motor vehicle on Jan. 14, 1999.” However, the Judge found that Roadway had illegally disciplined Eash because “a reasonable person in [Eash’s] situation could have determined that a bona fide danger of accident or injury to his person existed and complainant had a reasonable apprehension of serious injury to himself or to the public because of the vehicles’ unsafe condition.” The judge ordered Roadway to remove from its files the warning letter that it issued to Eash.

When You Can Refuse To Drive

From these cases we can discern several rules about when a driver can refuse to drive due to adverse weather conditions.

*
A driver may refuse to start work if the weather is sufficiently hazardous at or near the time he is scheduled to begin as to make it unsafe to operate a commercial vehicle on the highways.
*
A driver cannot speculate unreasonably into the future regarding what the road conditions will be beyond a few hours.
*
A refusal to drive due to adverse road conditions must be reasonable. The refusal should be based on the driver’s personal observations, weather reports from the radio and television, calls to the Department of Transportation or Highway Patrol, if possible, and information received from other drivers if such information is available.
*
Additionally, the driver should be able to articulate for a Court the precise facts that led him to believe that it would have been unsafe for him to operate a commercial vehicle on the highways.

Remedies

If an employer illegally fires or disciplines a driver for refusing to drive a commercial vehicle in dangerous weather, the driver can seek relief under the STAA. A driver must file a complaint with the federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration within 180 days after he receives notice of the illegal discipline. OSHA will investigate a complaint filed under the STAA and thereafter issue a decision. If any party objects within 30 days to OSHA’s decision, the case will be assigned to an Administrative Law Judge for consideration. The STAA provides broad relief to an employee who is successful in proving that he was illegally disciplined or fired. A successful claimant is entitled to reinstatement, expungement of his work record, back pay, other damages, attorney fees and legal costs.

Ultimately, the professional truck driver is the best judge of whether road conditions are so hazardous that he should not drive. He must act reasonably under the circumstances. If he acts reasonably in refusing a to drive due to dangerous weather conditions, and clearly conveys his reasons for refusing to drive to his employer, then the employer may not legally fire or discipline him for refusing to drive because of hazardous road conditions.

Note: Paul O. Taylor is an attorney with the Truckers Justice Center in St. Paul, Minnesota. He can be reached at 952-224-9166 or visit his website: truckersjusticecenter.com

[pro1driver]

it all boils down to the "descretion" of the driver....

at least show up for work and MAKE THE ATTEMPT to drive a mile or two, then turn around if you have to.

in TODAY's economy, with HIGH UNEMPLOYMENT, to down right refuse to drive, BEFORE YOU EVEN MAKE AN ATTEMPT, MIGHT or MAY result in being fired, and i can most certainly guarantee you of this.....

there WILL BE dozens of out of work drivers standing in line, when the "help wanted ad" goes into the papers..........

all a driver has to do is "his/her best" to get the job done.....

on a time schedule.......?? so what, slow down, drive safely, at least you should arrive in one piece, albeit........LATER........

[kboomarang]

I've never had an issue with my boss when I've shut down, sometimes you're forced to if they close the interstates, but at the same time I'll take pictures with my phone as a back-up to show him it ain't dry and 70 degrees in my work space. Might a good thing to do for anyone if they find the need to shut down.

[Cerberus_Kelpie]

As CLEARLY STATED, "It IS THE discretion of the Driver whether to start or continue to Drive in inclement Weather".

I will stop when I DECIDE IT IS UNSAFE regardless of Weather bulletins or equivalent.
I will cease driving when, say, the Interstate is closed.
I stop when I see no spray from Wheels in Icy conditions.
I stop when there are few vehicles on the road (when Snowing) or at some point within a reasonable time frame provided of course there is available LEGAL and OFF ROAD parking unless continuance of the trip/tour/journey can be accomplished without adverse (negative) situations/events.
>>Medians, Ditches, Culverts, Fields, Cliffs, Valleys, or Ponds do not qualify as LEGAL OFF ROAD parking unless one of these is where one ends in because of super trucker mentality<<

I don't know of ANY dispatcher that can see beyond the building they're in and determine with unquestionable clarity what is happening with Weather ANYWHERE else ESPECIALLY in another State.

If YOU are one of the many drivers with the tired line: "It's not my truck", then do as you want and the rest of US will watch and laugh when you end up in a ditch, culvert, field, shiny side down, etc., while extolling that wonderfully pointless attribute of sir knowitall.

YOU drive the truck YOU ARE IN and YOU determine the best course of action!!