Truckingboards Truck Drivers Forum

Truckingboards Fax Line (Toll Free)(888) 316-2554

 

 

 

                                                                                                                               


Go Back   Truckingboards Truck Drivers Forum > UNOFFICIAL LTL TRUCKING COMPANY FORUMS > OAK HARBOR FREIGHT LINES
  Contact/Privacy/Help Trucking Jobs   Facebook  Twitter   Add Your Link   Casino


Forum Stats
Members: 24,371
Threads: 59,469
Posts: 705,814
Total Online: 154

Newest Member: rolexwatch


 


Reply
 
LinkBack (1) Thread Tools Display Modes
  1 links from elsewhere to this Post. Click to view. #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-04-2009, 11:56 PM
Friendly Teamster
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Washington
Posts: 222
Blog Entries: 1
livlly909 is a name known to alllivlly909 is a name known to alllivlly909 is a name known to alllivlly909 is a name known to alllivlly909 is a name known to alllivlly909 is a name known to all
Default De-certification petition??

What I don't understand is how ONE GUY can file this many petitions??? He only works in Auburn, wouldn't employees from each terminal being filed have to file them instead of just the one person???

Furthermore, Oak Harbor could only get ONE person to file them?? Kinda see where this is going to go....HELLO?? THERE'S A REASON WHY THE UNION WAS STARTED THERE IN THE FIRST PLACE!!!!

What a waste of time and money on Ray M's part....having an attorney file them.....AND post his cell phone number and address for everyone to see on the Oakhanswers website!!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook!
Reply With Quote

  #2 (permalink)  
Old 03-05-2009, 12:46 AM
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Wa
Posts: 261
odawg10 is just really niceodawg10 is just really niceodawg10 is just really niceodawg10 is just really nice
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by livlly909 View Post
What I don't understand is how ONE GUY can file this many petitions??? He only works in Auburn, wouldn't employees from each terminal being filed have to file them instead of just the one person???

Furthermore, Oak Harbor could only get ONE person to file them?? Kinda see where this is going to go....HELLO?? THERE'S A REASON WHY THE UNION WAS STARTED THERE IN THE FIRST PLACE!!!!

What a waste of time and money on Ray M's part....having an attorney file them.....AND post his cell phone number and address for everyone to see on the Oakhanswers website!!
Is he one of the guys who crossed and is now trying to find away to get past denouncing the union?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 03-05-2009, 12:59 AM
Friendly Teamster
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Washington
Posts: 222
Blog Entries: 1
livlly909 is a name known to alllivlly909 is a name known to alllivlly909 is a name known to alllivlly909 is a name known to alllivlly909 is a name known to alllivlly909 is a name known to all
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by odawg10 View Post
Is he one of the guys who crossed and is now trying to find away to get past denouncing the union?
I believe that is why he did it, yes. That or just being an a** in general.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 03-05-2009, 01:53 AM
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: ???????????
Posts: 183
foster1662 will become famous soon enoughfoster1662 will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by livlly909 View Post
What I don't understand is how ONE GUY can file this many petitions??? He only works in Auburn, wouldn't employees from each terminal being filed have to file them instead of just the one person???

Furthermore, Oak Harbor could only get ONE person to file them?? Kinda see where this is going to go....HELLO?? THERE'S A REASON WHY THE UNION WAS STARTED THERE IN THE FIRST PLACE!!!!

What a waste of time and money on Ray M's part....having an attorney file them.....AND post his cell phone number and address for everyone to see on the Oakhanswers website!!
I'm surprised Oak Harbor would post his name and address and phone#
on the internet for all to see? I printed one out and all the information
was very easy to read and yes all these De-cert letters were all filed by the same person.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 03-05-2009, 03:23 AM
expecting more respect
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 31
mrtrukstr will become famous soon enough
Default

I mentioned this is a different thread and I'll say it again IN MY OPINION
everyone of them are from the same petitioner so it is quite obvious that ohfl has had their attorneys drum up someone from a right to work orginization to file these (on behalf of someone/anyone). another futile attempt to eliminate the union. maybe speculation but hard to dispute the names on the petitions. again no body that has gone through this would be so stupid as to try to get rid of the union now!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 03-05-2009, 11:04 AM
Seasoned Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: pac nw
Posts: 727
truckchick1 is a glorious beacon of lighttruckchick1 is a glorious beacon of lighttruckchick1 is a glorious beacon of lighttruckchick1 is a glorious beacon of lighttruckchick1 is a glorious beacon of light
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by livlly909 View Post
What I don't understand is how ONE GUY can file this many petitions??? He only works in Auburn, wouldn't employees from each terminal being filed have to file them instead of just the one person???

Furthermore, Oak Harbor could only get ONE person to file them?? Kinda see where this is going to go....HELLO?? THERE'S A REASON WHY THE UNION WAS STARTED THERE IN THE FIRST PLACE!!!!

What a waste of time and money on Ray M's part....having an attorney file them.....AND post his cell phone number and address for everyone to see on the Oakhanswers website!!
A decertification election has only one purpose and effect: to remove the union as the “exclusive bargaining representative” of the employees. A decertification election is different from a "deauthorization" election. A deauthorization election has only one purpose and effect: to remove the “union security ” forced-unionism clause from the contract. In a deauthorization election, the union remains as the exclusive bargaining representative, and the collective bargaining agreement remains in effect, except for the forced unionism clause.

The National Labor Relations Board maintains many rules governing when employees can file for a decertification election. The first rule is the "certification bar," which holds that petitions for a decertification election cannot be filed for 1 year after a union wins an NLRB conducted election.

Another important rule is the "contract bar," which holds that petitions for a decertification election cannot be filed during the first 3 years of a collective bargaining agreement, except for during a certain 30-day "window period." In most workplaces, the 30-day “window period” for filing a decertification petition with the NLRB occurs 60 to 90 days prior to the expiration date or 3 year anniversary of the contract, whichever comes first. In the health care industry (such as hospitals), the 30-day “window period” occurs 90 to 120 days prior to the expiration date of the contract or 3 year anniversary of the contract, whichever comes first.

A decertification petition can also be filed anytime after a contract expires or becomes more than 3 years old. However, if your employer and the union enter into a successor contract, the new contract will begin another 3 year "contract bar" on decertification elections. Thus, if you miss the "window period" for filing a petition for a decertification election, you may have to wait for another 3 years to request a decertification election.

Most employees prefer a workplace where they are free to discuss their terms and conditions of employment directly with the employer, without intervention by a third-party. They also prefer a workplace in which union membership and the payment of dues is voluntary, as this forces the union hierarchy to be more accountable to the rank-and-file workers. Instead of relying on threats, intimidation, and even firings to gain financial support, union officials have to sell the benefits of union membership to the individual employees.

Under the National Labor Relations Act, if 30% or more of the employees in a bargaining unit sign a Decertification Petition, the National Labor Relations Board will conduct a secret ballot election to determine if a majority of the employees wish to decertify the union and stop it from any further “exclusive representation.” If the petitioning employees win that election, then the company becomes nonunion and all employees are free to bargain on their own, and negotiate their own terms and conditions of employment. Moreover, if 50% or more of the employees in a bargaining unit sign a petition that they no longer want to be represented by the union, the employer can withdraw recognition without an election if it wishes to do so. (Except where the contract bar applies, as discussed above.)

The petition must be an employee effort. Employer assistance is unlawful and, if there is any, the union will nullify the effort by filing an unfair labor practice charge.

HOW TO GET STARTED: First, employees should assess the strength of support for decertification within their specific bargaining unit. Usually, is it not worth calling for such an election unless the petitioning employees believe they will be able to garner the support of a majority of their fellow employees. The petitioning employees will need the votes of a majority of those employees who show up to vote on election day.

In order to proceed, employees should collect signatures on a petition which reads something like the following:

He has to have gotten signed petitions from each location. Did he get the replacement drivers to sign them?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook!
Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.truckingboards.com/trucking/upload/oak-harbor-freight-lines/55142-de-certification-petition.html
Posted By For Type Date
OAK HARBOR FREIGHT LINES on Truckingboards Truck Driver Forums | BoardReader This thread Refback 06-17-2009 03:29 PM



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
vB.Sponsors
Advertisement System V2.5 By   Branden