Democrat moves to repeal 22nd Amendment - Page 2

Kings disciple · #7 (**permalink**) 01-18-2009, 08:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmy g

The Tenth was ignorred when we became a huge Federal Government is god.

Billy C signed the Millinial Charter which suggests the UN has Dominion over all men, women, and children in the world; so the Constitution is legally no good now. Libs in the Supreme Court rule not by the Constitution, but by International Law.

Technically, our Constitution was suspended by FDR via the Emergency Banking Act of 1933, allowing the Fed Reserve to print money. Since they are still doing that-- I'd then have to assume it's never been UNsuspended?????

BHO wouldn't even get the Dem Nomination if more Prez Terms were allowed. Big Bill would take it and run.....

You got that right brother....slick willy would have stayed in there till he died moving ahead with his one world agenda. He was impeached but he still would not leave!

That is why I was so thankful to God that Hilary lost so the clintons were finally out of the white house but.....watch close, BHO and Hilary are mending thier realationship quickly these days...

bubba74 · #8 (**permalink**) 01-18-2009, 10:25 AM

If the 22nd is repealed, Billy could run again.

Kings disciple · #9 (**permalink**) 01-18-2009, 11:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bubba74

If the 22nd is repealed, Billy could run again.

God forbid...

jimmy g · #10 (**permalink**) 01-19-2009, 01:22 AM

It would be an interesting race. The First Black Prez (Clinton); vs the first Fake American/Kenyan (who hasn't served a day in office-- yet has been proclaimed "the Messiah" to his followers....)

Hey, he beat the Constitution thru his fake Birth Certificate and sealing his records. Why change the Constitution? It already doesn't seem to apply.....

Kings disciple · #11 (**permalink**) 01-19-2009, 09:22 AM

Quote:

Hey, he beat the Constitution thru his fake Birth Certificate and sealing his records. Why change the Constitution? It already doesn't seem to apply.....

Sad but true, slick willy beat it many times also. (impeached but stayed in the oval etc.)

That takes me back to my comment that there should be term limits on the Fed. supreme court. They are supposed to interpret the constitution as applys to whatever is at question. If they are not doing that or are stretching to advance a personal agenda then they could be voted out.

Not only are they stretching the constitution now they are amending it without fear of losing his/her seat on the bench. Thus we have legislation from the wrong branch by a small group of people that do'nt have to answer to anybody.

bubba74 · #12 (**permalink**) 01-19-2009, 10:25 AM

Why all the comparisons to Lincoln, wasnt Lincoln a Republican. Shouldnt they have picked the previous Liberal Messiah FDR?