For your information I had no vote on the "giving the pension away" issue and all my pension time occurred well before the vote you mention. And yes, as I've stated, my investments have done reasonably well.
Well,...That's great that your private investments have done well.......just imagine how much better they would've done if Wall Street didn't ....manufacture...a few "market adjustments".....based on demographics and whims....
I certainly don't wish anyone ill, trying to set up their retirement......
But the point I was trying to make,...is that the "average investor" in a 401(k).......has no clue how the market works......
.....And you think Wall Street, and the investment firms,...aren't aware of that fact?
Next thing you know,...you'll be defending Wall Street for their......."honesty"...........
Obviously,....you're an above-average private investor....That's great.....Is your neighbor? Your co-worker? Are you providing free investment advice so that your immediate circle of acquaintenances can do just as well?
Defined-benefit pensions were created to........."democratize"....the retirement procedure. I think you will agree retirement,.....especially in a Labor-intensive job like ours,.......is NOT a Game to see who has the most,....and who lives on dog food until they die.......
Let’s see if I can figure this out, 1 active paying in for every 4 retired. Even at full rate there is no way that the fund will survive. So explain to us where we got to vote on pension, turn down contract, lose even more customer, then lose more employees paying in to the fund. That sounds like a good idea to me. People said that if you invested in 401 k that Teamsters would take your money and use that against us in contract negotiations quoting what employees have saved to try and sell 401 k verses pension.
Just wait boys and girls there is another company fixing to get out of the fund.
Demographics , Brother,....as mentioned above. Those 4 retirees already had at least 30 years of contributions,...from starting at 30 years ago,....paid into those funds. It isn't like the fund was created yesterday,...and immediately there are four...claimants to each worker.....
If you contact your Fund, they will tell you Demographics and Mortality rates figure heavily into their fiduciary figures......
Since there are much fewer companies paying into MEPFs,....that means there are fewer companies to go bankrupt, and pull out of the Fund,....
....unlike the late '80's-'90's,...where the original 2,300 Union carriers involved with MEPFs , and there were bankruptcies every week,...was pared down to the figure it is today......
The late '80's -'90's happened........ahh....decades ago....MEPFs SURVIVED that period,....and MOST were thriving into the middle 2000's,....paying extra benefits to keep from triggering the ERISA Act provisions to allow companies to....quit paying into the Funds, because they were..."fully funded"....
So,...Wall Street had to create a.....financial disaster in 2008,.....to kick many....NOT ALL....Funds into dangerous territory...
A few "friends" on Congress to pass some...slimy legislation,...and,...Viola'!......you have a "pension crisis"....
Demographically-speaking,....the companies brought on the "4 to 1" ratio themselves. As companies went bankrupt in the '80's-'90's, the employees of those companies were immediately hired by other Teamster companies,...Most of 'em , anyway.....
The remaining companies saved....billions, probably,..over the decades, by not having to train new-hires who had never worked in LTL.....I had heard a statistic that, if you hired a new driving-school trainee,...it would take at least 5 years before he became a "profitable" employee in LTL.
So,....the remaining Teamster companies are....top-heavy in older, close-to-retirement employees,.....simply because conditions created by deregulation allowed them to "use" bankrupt companies as....."training facilities"....for "new-hires"....who were actually OLDER , EXPERIENCED Teamsters.......
That's why there's a "4 to1" ratio,..........and , demographically speaking,...within the next five years,....there will be a very long spell where Teamster companies under MEPF pensions......will have VERY FEW retirements.....because of all the new-hires the companies will have to hire, to replace retirees....
...(...who will die,...and greatly lower that "4 to1" ratio in the same five years...).......
Don't be in such a sweat to kick the coffin door closed on MEPFs..........
And,....Once again,...you've proved my point about "average" investors. If guys can be...stampeded...by rumors about 401(k)'s.......how good of ..."investors"...will they be?
...And Wall Street won't ...take advantage..of that lack of knowledge?