What I haven't seen here is anything pertaining to the process around the vote. Personally, a freeze is a pain, but its something that I can deal with.
What I really have a problem with is the way I hear the vote is going to be handled. Are we being setup? I may be mistaken (if I am please set me right) but my steward said that the vote was going to be tallied as a company whole and not individual terminals and that a negative vote was being considered a strike vote. I see at least 2 problems here.
Most terminals have about 3 years left on their contracts thus giving us a contractually agreed to compensation package. If individual terminals voted to turn the concession down, MS has it at his discretion to shut them down. This would technically be a "lock out", but if the vote its considered a strike vote 2 things happen. First, it takes a 2/3 super-majority to OK a strike and second, even if we had that super-majority it then is officially a strike rather than a lock out making us ineligible for unemployment compensation, which with a lock out we would be.
Does anyone else here smell collusion? If so, we need to act quickly to expose the rats, both company and union if necessary. Unions are supposed to be democracy in the workplace and all I've seen so far is a bunch of medieval feudalism.