Guest viewing is limited
  • Truckingboards is a MEMBERS ONLY Private Forum that first got it's start in 1999, Membership is 100% Free, We have Over 40k Members and approaching 2 million posts that date back to the early 2000's.Registration is easy and fast. We specialize in LTL trucking. Get off those Facebook Groups and come to a place where your identity will be unknown unless you tell someone. Truckingboards has a mobile app that works for Android you can install from your mobile browser. Sorry Apple Users, I know nothing about them.

    Click Here

    For instructions on how to install the mobile app.

Mass Formation Psychosis

Toby

I live Here
There were between 7 and 12 million non-Jews killed by the (⊙▃⊙)'s as well, they were mostly Christians. Remember the saying " First they came for"? Well That was a Catholic that wrote that, and it was not the Jews that they first came for. But let's go back to some more of what Sanger wrote, " Birth control appeals to the advanced radical because it is calculated to undermine the authority of the Christian churches. I look forward to seeing humanity free someday of the tyranny of Christianity no less than Capitalism." You see this is being used as a tool, it is being polarized at a time that no one was even talking about these issues.



Population Control as an agenda that coincides with the whole "Green Movement", In Grant's book Killer Angel he included a quote from an essay that English Churchman, Thomas Robert Malthus wrote in his," his "An Essay on the Principle of Population," It goes like this, " "All children born, beyond what would be required to keep up the population to a desired level, must necessarily perish, unless room may be made for them by the deaths of grown persons ...Therefore ...we should facilitate, instead of foolishly and vainly endeavoring to impede, the operations of nature in producing this mortality..."

Now let's go back to what Dr. Sam Keen said in 1996 again, " "We must speak far more clearly about sexuality, contraception, about abortion, about values that control the population, because the ecological crisis, in short, is the population crisis.
 

Toby

I live Here
Cut the population by 90% and there aren't enough people left to do a great deal of ecological damage." This is also something that we see in the U.N. in November 1991, Jacques Cousteau wrote: "The damage people cause to the planet is a function of demographics - it is equal to the degree of development. One American burdens the earth much more than twenty Bangladeshes ... This is a terrible thing to say. In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000 people per day. It is a horrible thing to say, but it's just as bad not to say it." - The Population Controllers: New American Magazine: June 27, 1994: p 7. This was originally in UNESCO Courier publication.



Also in 1996 you had The UN Conference on Human Settlements (Habitat II) in Istanbul Turkey, at this conference an alarming picture was put forth in regards to our way of life in the United States, we see this today with those that support so many of the things that the Left and the so called "Greens" talk about. What we are seeing today is one more "Nudge" in this direction. At the conference it was discussed that ," The American ways-free speech, individualism, travel, and Christianity-are out.

A new set of economic, environmental, and social guidelines are in. Citizenship, democracy, and education have been redefined".
 

Toby

I live Here
Let's look at how some of this is being implemented right under our noses; Through Political Correctness we are now to intimidated to exercise our Constitutional right of freedom of speech to speak out against the establishment and the directions that they will impose upon us, once you speak out you are immediately attacked as a hater or ⓇⒶⒸⒾⓈⓉ and many other ways for doing so. Private Property the cornerstone of our society is also under attack as well. We seen this with the manipulation of the housing market and the eventual crash. Of course most want to assign that entirely upon the Banks, but fail to include the government and their roll in the whole crash. Now we see that the Government through Fannie and Freddie are talking about becoming landlords and renting out the properties that we foreclosed. Christianity , well that is obvious even if you have one eye open or not with the new mandate that this administration is attempting to impose. Individualism, look at what the "Occupy" movements' have been calling for and our growing dependency on the Government for our needs.

When we lose the fundamental individualism of self responsibility on a whole host of issues, we lose our individualism one small step at a time. Education, we can go one for days and days on how our education system has been infiltrated by this agenda.

It must be a coincidence though that the central focus for "Birth Control" and the Mandate from the government is focused on two major parts of this though. A Education institution that so happens to be an Institution that is run by a Christian Church is it not?
 

Toby

I live Here
"The Planet Has A Fever" ~ Al Gore

Al Gore the Spokes mouth for today's "Green Movement" and "Climate Scare" has long roots in promoting population control as a means to "healing" our planet. Recently at a "Games for Change" conference in New York he stated, " One of the things we could do about it is to change the technologies, to put out less of this pollution, to stabilize the population, and one of the principle ways of doing that is to empower and educate girls and women. You have to have ubiquitous availability of fertility management so women can choose how many children have, the spacing of the children… You have to educate girls and empower women. And that’s the most powerful leveraging factor, and when that happens, then the population begins to stabilize and societies begin to make better choices and more balanced choices.” Since when does America have a population control problem? When you look at the actual figures post the World War II Baby Boom population figures have been on a steady decline. Somehow Mr. Gore thinks that if we exterminate a child or if we can emulate something like what China practices with the one child policy in this country that we will "heal" our planet. He mentions that we need to educate our girls, does that include teaching them that they need to take personal responsibility for their actions as well and that we should start those lessons at a young age instead of teaching them that they will not have to worry about any consequences for their actions because the government will take care of them in the end?

Does that include teaching them the best method to avoid an unwanted pregnancy is abstinence?

No Mr. Gore like many others that surround this issue and this administration have deeper goals and beliefs. One question that I have from his statement that he fails to mention, is it empowering women and young ladies by teaching them that slaughtering a Human life or not taking personal responsibility for their actions really a solution to our pollution concerns or is it part of a much larger agenda?
 

Toby

I live Here
Mr. Gore in particular has pushed that we need to further increase regulations or mandates on a whole host of sectors besides population control. How do we go about doing this? We Indoctrinate the youth! One needs to remember that Population Control does not only mean controlling the rate of births, but means controlling the population. Once you take the steps down the road of determining that through a mandate or regulation that a private institution should be forced to do something that goes against its teachings where do you stop? Do you take the next step and say we need to mandate that we need to exterminate the so called "Unwanted" or "Undesirable" such as those that are not as physically or mentally fit as others? Do we than mandate under the auspice that a particular child needs to be aborted because they may not grow up into a contributing member of society? Do we than determine that we should examine and mandate that a senior citizen is no longer a contributing member of society and is a burden on our planet so we should euthanize them as well? Should a government then through a panel of bureaucrats decide what medical coverage an individual can receive based on their ability to or drain to the society at large contribute?

Should a panel of government officials place a scale of individual pollution factor that an individual contributes and decide through a mandate or regulation just what freedom that individual will have to heat or cool their home, or drive their car?

Should a government panel start down the road of determining the sez or numbers of children that we are allowed to have?

After all it may be a medical issue or a safety issue that they can cite as a reason to start down this slippery road.
 

Toby

I live Here
Let's take a moment and look at two key figures in this administration that is pushing not only regulation nation but also population control, we will get back to the U.N. and its roll later. Till then consider the recent Agenda 21 and Sustainable Communities into the big picture because they are all interwoven.



John Holdren, President Obama's Science Czar. This man has pushed the population control argument for years going back before he even stepped foot in a government office.

He follows along with Margret Sanger's beliefs and yes even Adolf ಠ▄ಠ's once you look into that connection with population control. In Holdren's book , " Ecoscience" he outlined the need and desire for an increasing role of government to curtail reproductive autonomy and spurred an international feminist campaign to replace the idea of population control with a focus on women's health and rights. Does this sound a bit familiar with the argument that is being brought forth today?

Replace the narrative of population control with women's health and rights, this is exactly the argument that is being put out by this administration and those on the left over the issue of contraception.



In Hodren's book, "Ecoscience" he advocated and I quote, " "In today's world, however, the number of children in a family is a matter of profound public concern, For example, no one may lawfully have more than one spouse at a time.

Why should the law not be able to prevent people from having more than two children?" also in his book he advocated that the government should consider adding a sterileant to the drinking water or food supply.

This under the auspice of over population and environmental concerns, but eerily it harkens back to what the founder of planned parenthood promoted as well with sterilization and what the (⊙▃⊙) government implemented with the "Undesirables".
 

Toby

I live Here
This man is our so called Science Czar now, he has the ear of the president and is not accountable to the public as he was not elected by the citizens. He also has the ability to determine what studies are released to the public and just where funding will go for research.

In Hodrens book he also advocated that legalizing “compulsory abortions,” ie forced abortions carried out against the will of the pregnant women just as they do in China once we move to a reduced mandated child policy. He advocated that the government mandate the forced sterilization of people that the "authority's" deemed to have to many children already or who have contributed to " “general social deterioration”. But that is only scraping the surface of this guy, and we are supposed to believe that there is not a larger agenda at play are we? How about this that he advocated, Implementing a system of “involuntary birth control,” where both men and women would be mandated to have an infertility device implanted into their body at puberty and only have it removed temporarily if they received permission from the government to have a baby. This is something that the so called Progressives on the Left do not want you to know about this man and the fact that he sits in the office that he does at a time that we see this playing out with the recent congressional hearings on birth control .

Remember the narrative was changed from population control to women's health and rights. The current push is so that these mandates make it into the "Affordable Health Care" or Obama Care law where it forces private institutions and companies to cover these costs.

I have asked throughout this article, where do the mandates stop and just what will be the future mandates or regulations that is decided that need to be included.

The law was passed without most of our elected officials even reading it and included the right of the HHS secretary to load in regulations on top of what was in the initial law in the first place. Currently there is over 10,000 additional pages of regulations coming out piled on top or the original law.
 

Toby

I live Here
That brings us to President Obama's Regulatory Czar Cass Sunstein and the ever increasing regulations on everything from making farm dust a pollutant to his views on population as well. These two guys are a scary team, but they are not alone when you look into the background of all that they have advocated and their allies in the EPA and HHS.



I will include both of these two and come back to Sanger, the U.N., population control, and the attack on religion and how this whole argument that has erupted over Sandra Fluke testimony in Congress the other day actually is part of a much larger agenda later.



Cass Sunstein is the hammer that will push through the population control and the U.N. Agenda 21 program through his position as the Regulatory Czar.

We see this already occurring with Sustainable Development, we see through the regulations that are ever increasing people will be forced into reductions of what they currently are accustomed to. This includes deciding family sizes! Sustein has authored 35 books, in them he advocated, among other things, human euthanasia as a major component of health care reform legislation and animal rights over human rights. In 2003 he published a paper titled “Lives, Life Years, and Willingness to Pay” in which he argues that human life varies in value.

In it he advocated that Government bureaucrats should rely on “the value of a statistical life year” which would “likely result in significantly lower health benefits calculations for elderly people, and significantly higher benefits calculations for children.”

A further quote from the paper reads “A program that saves young people produces more welfare than one that saves old people.” Remember those "Imaginary" Death Panels? Once you have someone that is advocating that the government should decide the worth of an existing human, what small step is it to decide the worth of an unborn child?

Is that child going to hold less value than an animal and should we then also assign more worth to that animal and regulate citizens so that they cannot harvest crops on a certain track of land?
 

Toby

I live Here
Do we then decide that we need to regulate the needs of existing humans for the basic of needs such as food and fuel? Today the two major factors that we see increasing in cost is Energy and Food, this is something this government no longer counts when we look at the inflation rates, but it is a deciding factor in a couples mind when they are deciding to bring another child into the world when looking at the affordability of raising that child.



The recent mandate by HHS Secretary Sebelius that health insurers birth control and other women’s health care issues must be covered by insurance companies at no cost is intentional to drive this industry out of business and force even more people on government healthcare. Recently she even announced that the industry will not survive, one cannot look to far to connect the dots on this one.


Once again, "We must pass it before we find out what's in it.", Sebelius's department was also tasked to write the regulations that were to be attached to the law with the help of none other than Cass Sunstein, the same Regulation Czar that is tasked to implement the U.N.'s Agenda 21 and Sustainable Development programs.
 

Toby

I live Here
Ok that was written around 10 yrs ago, now look around you today and you can see much of it playing out.

We already know this whole pandemic effected the elderly the most, cutting that population down effectively.

We do know for a fact these experimental drugs they are mandating and segregating society with has been shown to effect women’s reproductive systems.

We have seen through regulations and attempts to use agencies to dictate and mandate like OSHA control over peoples lives.

They are as Cass likes to say further “Nudging” is along the path .

I have another one that I wrote back then but it’s twice as long. That one really exposed what we are seeing today
 

Toby

I live Here
Let’s look at how now due to the pandemic we have shortages- and those yelling that the government needs to control the distribution as well as supply.

We have those on the Left saying eat bugs instead of meat

And frankly through the Mass Formation Psychosis they have nearly achieved their goal
 

Toby

I live Here

Boston students freezing in classrooms due to COVID requirements​


The reason is that all of the public schools in Boston are required by a school board mandate to leave the windows in the classrooms cracked open. In January. Parents are already complaining that they’re having to bundle their kids up in multiple layers of clothing just to get them through the day. The COVID madness is strong with this city, folks. (National Review)

 

Toby

I live Here

Video: Absolute Nut-Job Woman Wearing A Closed Vest Ventilator Is Kicked Off Delta Flight For Complaining The Passengers Aren’t Masked Enough​



67FBDD9D-3E6C-4112-88A6-CFAA5546A017.md.jpg
A video that has gone viral on social media shows how extreme mass formation psychosis can actually get.

 
Top