this was all i saw thanks for posting it/there was also 3 more pages with term closings for both newpenn and yrc but did not see it
Same thing goes for Reddaway. And the Co. is not bluffing , IMO !
The laws against threats for going Union probably do not apply once you are Union.you know, this just bust my balls. when i was at a non-union company(estes) and we tried to organize them here in baltimore, the union wanted us to record all threats of closures, loss of work, or job loss has this would be against the law and a nlrb violation. funny, now here i am with a union and the same type of threats that were illegal without a union is now somehow ok? oh that's right, must be because the union is also threatening us...
well, thats about par for Zollers.... close down the profitable company's and merge them into the non-profitable one! Any wonder why YRC is in such a mess!!
yeah i'm sure. it just funny how the union will demean the nons for the same thing they almost seem to be supporting.The laws against threats for going Union probably do not apply once you are Union.
Joe are you making things up or did I miss the rest of the Memo?negative, they would close overlapping terminals only..keep the brand but end-tail.
that's a dooms day if New Penn votes no
negative, they would close overlapping terminals only..keep the brand but end-tail.
that's a dooms day if New Penn votes no
Threats to coerce you to vote for a contract are grounds for a labor charge. I question whether or not this qualifies as such a threat. It smells fishy.
Negative..since the letter came after the vote was in I wouldn't call it a threat..there were plenty of warnings from the union no less and the company. If New Penn felt they were in a strong position and voted no..there will be regrets