"...This was not just directed at Oak Harbor emploees this is for all to read. You make it sound as if you have talked to all Oak Harbor emploees? How many Spok emploees have you talked to or Lewiston emploees?"
Well, Mr. Spokane shop steward, I have talked to Lewiston employees in the past, as well as Spokane employees. Am I to supply names, addresses and phone numbers, or will their Social Security numbers suffice?
Why do you ask?
"...I also feel that the last contract was negotiated very improperly. The way I hear it the Union and Company had come to an agreement on a five year contract that I read and felt was a better contract than the one we recieved!"
You felt. Hmmm. Gee, bud, I don't remember hearing that you were present at any of the over forty-plus meetings that were held during the last contract negotiations. But you seem to know so much about it. I'm sure your big daddy down at the local was giving you the low-down, huh?
As to the five-year agreement we voted down that you felt was so great, let me point out a few facts that you seem to be slightly ignorant of:
- In the five-year agreement we voted down (and when I say we, I mean the majority of the 550+ Teamster members of OHFL), we had the same amount of money to wages we neded up with in the three-year agreement we did ratify, only spread out over five years instead of three. Now, surely even you can summon up the brain power to do the math and figure that one out.
- Secondly, we had no pension money at all in the five year agreement we voted down, unlike the three-year agreement that was ratified.
- Thirdly, and most important, in the three year agreement tha was ratified, we ended up with true full MOB on our H&W. No strings attached. It is, I believe, the only freight contract on the West Coast that has that currently. The five-year agreement that was voted down had all sorts of strings attached. If any of the Teamster plans exceeded a certain percentage in a certain amount of time (I believe twenty-four months), then the company could pull al of those members out of that plan
without their say-so and without recourse!
I don't know what you were reading, son, but you had better get your prescription checked! It was a lousy recommended offer, and the rank-and-file exercised their right to vote it down, which I am proud to say they did.
"...I also do not blame the Vanderpol famliy for being very upset about the way this was handled. When I shake hands and give my word to anyone, Thats That!!!"
Hmmm. So we get handed crappy contracts for a decade and a half, and we finally show a little spinal fortitude and cooperation (something you seem to be lacking in great measure, I might add) to get a decent contract, and then the Vander Pol family goes around whining about how they got screwed and how the union broke a deal.
What deal?
A recommended offer does not guarantee a ratified contract, and if there were deals being made up north by Buck and his cohorts, then I guess he got a little servihng of what he deserved, didn't he?
How about you let the Vander Pols worry about their affairs, and you start acting like Teamster, instead of a Me-ster.
Can you do that?
I wonder...:annoyed: