I’m gonna combine my response since these two post are basically making the same points...
I’ll not deny @mattbob’s claims because he’s probably right witn his facts in a lot of these cases and
@SwampRatt also makes some valid points as well, but....sorry, they’re all irrelevant.
At the end of the day, it doesn’t matter what industries have moved to town, who’s paying their employees what, how much this or that cost, etc, it just doesn’t...what matters is can a company attract good quality help
and retain that help with what’s being offered through wages, benefits, working environment, etc...if so, then things are where they should be and if not then things will get adjusted to attract and retain, simple.
If we look at what took place in CLT several years ago for example, we were in the same situation as a lot of the centers you guys mentioned...it’s cheaper to live here, cost more here, etc, and it all fell on deaf ears. Then we hit a driver retention problem where not only could we not retain drivers, they had a hard time attracting “qualified” drivers so an adjustment had to be made and we were bumped up a tier. Under this criteria, which appears to carry the most weight, the case could be made that we be bumped up another tier since every time you go to the careers portion of the website, there’s always a job number for a driver position in CLT since we still have an issue with attracting qualified drivers.
Don’t get me wrong, I’m not saying you guys don’t deserve the higher tier...personally I’d like to see only two tiers...but what I am saying is that regardless of COL, who’s paying what, yada yada yada, until your center experiences an attraction and retention problem, you probably shouldn't hold your breath.