That's funny, and that's also why your side has no credibility when it comes to the Constitution. You should upgrade your sources since that source makes you look incompetent.
So which one of those wasn't a violation of the constitution ?
Ok. I'll pick one and happily make a fool of you. Works for me.
Not so quick Spanky.
Blah, blah, blah.Not so quick Spanky.
Congress unmistakably refused to appropriate funding for the construction of a border wall in the amounts that the Administration sought, and the Administration is violating the Appropriations Clause by nevertheless spending money Congress refused to provide.”
Challengers respond in dispute over funding for border wall - SCOTUSblog
The battle over the Trump administration’s efforts to build a wall along the U.S. border with Mexico continued to unfold today. Last week the federal government asked the Supreme Court to put on hold a district court’s order that prohibited the government from using $2.5 billion in Pentagon funds fowww.scotusblog.com
Supreme Court allows border wall construction to continueNot so quick Spanky.
Congress unmistakably refused to appropriate funding for the construction of a border wall in the amounts that the Administration sought, and the Administration is violating the Appropriations Clause by nevertheless spending money Congress refused to provide.”
Challengers respond in dispute over funding for border wall - SCOTUSblog
The battle over the Trump administration’s efforts to build a wall along the U.S. border with Mexico continued to unfold today. Last week the federal government asked the Supreme Court to put on hold a district court’s order that prohibited the government from using $2.5 billion in Pentagon funds fo
www.nbcnews.com
NextSupreme Court allows border wall construction to continue
The court denied a request from the Sierra Club to halt construction on some sections of the wall that are being built with Pentagon money.
You haters gonna hate!Supreme Court allows border wall construction to continue
The court denied a request from the Sierra Club to halt construction on some sections of the wall that are being built with Pentagon money.
Still doesn't give the president the right to misappropriate funds.
This ruling has nothing to do with whether it was constitutional but only that the group had no legal status to challenge it.Supreme Court allows border wall construction to continue
The court denied a request from the Sierra Club to halt construction on some sections of the wall that are being built with Pentagon money.
You haters gonna hate!Supreme Court allows border wall construction to continue
The court denied a request from the Sierra Club to halt construction on some sections of the wall that are being built with Pentagon money.
When it comes to the Constitution you and your America-hating party should avoid the subject. Or keep looking foolish, either one is fine with me.
You should play backup role to Peppermint Patty since you are both spin doctors. But you're both horrible at it.
We've still got money that was appropriated for the border that still hasn't been used for wall because of open borders Joe.
Or…..it wasn’t unconstitutional.
He’s as party line as magoo was.
Blocking twitter users. Now that’s a biggie!
