You are welcome to think I have an anti-union agenda but I don't. Three of my closest 4 friends are in unions (2 police officers and a fireman), my oldest daughter is in a teachers' union. They all have pretty good planned pension benefits. I have stated several times, in various threads, that I am not anti-union; I am anti-Teamsters.
My mistake I didn't realize it's only the Teamsters union you are against. Another mistake I made is that the Kline-Miller amendment is only 161 pages..............I am happy to hear that your union friends and family have "pretty good planned benefits" I also have friends and relatives who are active cops, teachers, public works employees and retirees. But they are all in public employee pension funds which are in very poor financial shape. Just in NJ alone the taxpayers are on the hook for the about $90 billion in underfunded pension and healthcare benefits due to 20 years of deferring budgeted payments into those funds...............Maybe your governor might tell Chris Christie how your public employee pension funds are in pretty good shape.
I am not "happy" with the pension cuts, I just don't know what the solution is, and believe reasonable people should have seen it coming.
I am not happy with the way the bill was passed. In fact, I specifically said "lots of bills should be presented as stand-alone bills"
Show me where I defended the backdoor passage of this bill."
I didn't say you defended it what I said was
and your lack of support on this issue it appears you are happy with the pension cuts. I find it hard to believe any taxpayer would side with the underhanded way this bill was passed. I would expect all working people to side with the Teamster retirees.
I didn't see anywhere in your posts where you even hinted at showing you were unhappy or disapproved with the way Kline-Miller was passed. I took your "lots of bills should be presented as stand-alone bills" as your way of blowing it off and saying it happens lots of times and it's no big deal...................It may happen lots of times but not to a bill that takes away pension protection for over 1.5 million retirees
It appears that you don't have a problem with taxpayer funded public employee pension and healthcare plans. And you're not anti union just anti Teamsters. So now I understand why your posts lack any support for the Teamster pension fund's retirees affected by the new changes to ERISA. IMO your posts on this thread are thinly disguised cheap shots at the Teamsters and our pension funds.