Discussion in 'Old Dominion Freight Line' started by JIM BOB, Feb 17, 2018.
They are very upfront about the overtime policy when you’re offered the job, if you decide to take it that’s on you. Labor laws and exemptions aside that’s just common sense and not being an idiot.
It’s not like they’re lying about anything to get people in the door.
Stupid that OD will have to waste a bunch of money on this lawsuit. Just my opinion.
Maybe this fellows crusade is just what the industry needs. In every ‘revolution’ there’s one person with a vision. Tell me, would you turn down time and a half after 40 if he wins?
This will most likely be a dead wall.Love seeing thing's like this.Sometimes it will change thing's for the better.But,this all boil's down to a pissed off ex employee
Maybe. Nevertheless, it brings in the ‘dust-sniffers’ from a Federal agency that might be interested in just how things roll at some of these freight companies. If I’m a current employee at a place that doesn’t pay OT, or doesn’t pay OT until after ‘X’ amount of hours, I would welcome this with open arms. This is a class-action lawsuit too...which brings everybody’s hours into question.
There was a Florida based Trucking Company that lost a lawsuit with same deal has the OD Lawsuit back in 2016.Company agreed to start paying there dispatcher's & switcher's.Well,after reading that lawsuit believe this has some meat to it.Will see
ya, could have just paid ot and avoided it
I've been vocal on here with my displeasure with our ot policy on this forum but this is ridiculous. You agreed to take the job and chose to work in excess of 40 hours without ot pay. He can fight to change the law for the future, which I support but OD doesn't owe him anything for what he voluntary did in the past.
Here's the actual law...he does have a case if he never loaded at all.
Section 13(b)(1) of the FLSA provides an overtime exemption for employees who are within the authority of the Secretary of Transportation to establish qualifications and maximum hours of service pursuant to Section 204 of the Motor Carrier Act of 1935, except those employees covered by the small vehicle exception described below.
Thus, the 13(b)(1) overtime exemption applies to employees who are:
Employed by a motor carrier or motor private carrier, as defined in 49 U.S.C. Section 13102 (see Employer below);
Drivers, driver’s helpers, loaders, or mechanics whose duties affect the safety of operation of motor vehicles in transportation on public highways in interstate or foreign commerce (see Employee Duties below); and
Not covered by the small vehicle exception (see Small Vehicle Exception below).
Motor Carriers are persons providing motor vehicle transportation for compensation;
Motor Private Carriers are persons other than motor carriers transporting property by motor vehicle if the person is the owner, lessee, or bailee of the property being transported, and the property is being transported for sale, lease, rent, or bailment, or to further a commercial enterprise.
2. Employee Duties
The employee’s duties must include the performance, either regularly or from time to time, of safety-affecting activities on a motor vehicle used in transportation on public highways in interstate or foreign commerce. Employees must perform such duties as a driver, driver’s helper, loader, or mechanic. Employees performing such duties meet the duties requirement of the exemption regardless of the proportion of “safety affecting activities” performed, except where the continuing duties have no substantial direct effect on “safety of operation,” or where such safety affecting activities are so trivial, casual, and insignificant as to be de minimis (so long as there is no change in the duties).
Transportation involved in the employee’s duties must be in interstate commerce (across State or international lines) or connect with an intrastate terminal (rail, air, water, or land) to continue an interstate journey of goods that have not come to rest at a final destination.
Safety affecting employees who have not made an actual interstate trip may still meet the duties requirement of the exemption if:
a) The employer is shown to have an involvement in interstate commerce; and
b) The employee could, in the regular course of employment, reasonably have been expected to make an interstate journey or could have worked on the motor vehicle in such a way as to be safety-affecting.
The Secretary of Transportation will assert jurisdiction over employees for a four-month period beginning with the date they could have been called upon to, or actually did, engage in the carrier’s interstate activities. Thus, such employees would satisfy the duties requirement of the Section 13(b)(1) exemption for the same four-month period, notwithstanding references to the contrary in 29 C.F.R. § 782.2.
I’m not hourly but I’ll still play.
Say OD does start to pay overtime, and if they do this you could expect them to match many other companies pay that do give OT.
Saia, Dayton, and others - they all get overtime at the cost of a slightly lower wage, about $25/hour around me compared to ODs 28.73.
60 hours with OT at $25/hour: $1,750
60 hours straight time at ODs $28.73: $1,723
How many of you get 60 hours every week? Probably more like 50-55 in reality where you’ll actually earn more with the benefit that if you have a bad week, say only 40 hours, you’ll make $150 more than your overtime paid counterparts.
In a perfect world you’d get a higher hourly rate AND overtime, there are some companies like this and I’d love to see all of us getting paid as much as possible but when it comes down to a higher rate at straight time versus a lower rate with OT I would take the higher rate myself.
Something else to consider, maybe OD does lose this lawsuit. Goodbye full-time switchers, now linehaul and city guys spot their own trailers with help here and there from the dock. It’s as simple as that. This is a fairly powerful and efficient corporation, they shouldn’t just bend over because of a lawsuit that has several easy workarounds.
Fedex freight in my area is over 28 dollars an hour and they get overtime they are also getting a early raise this year that will put that number higher, the last year or so ltl companies have been raising there hourly rates at Dayton, saia, even central transport who have had depressed wages and bad insurance! Point being OD can’t say they pay a higher hourly wage anymore!
In my area, the northeast Fedex is around 27.50 with ot after 8 and Saia is crushing it at 29.54 with ot after 45. Contrary to what many supervisors at OD want drivers to believe those guys are getting as much ot as they want when it's busy. I like it here at OD, I have over 15 years with the company and don't want to start over somewhere else but we are definitely falling behind in pay.
OD is a great company to work for don’t get me wrong, but some pay issues should be looked at, linehaul drop and hook and fuel pay has been the same for over 15 years, a lot of companies such as Dayton and Fedex freight pay 15 minutes to fuel, OD pays a 1.50.. drop and hook is bad and gets worse depending on how many trailers you hook or drop, it all adds up and OD should it least take a look at these issues.
I know for a fact that Dayton is a lot higher than 25.00 an hour. Central transport is even higher than that now.
I won’t argue with that. Guess I didn’t realize how much it varied by region and I was just looking at what’s closest to me.
I’m in no way against anyone getting overtime I just see some benefits to a higher rate and straight time. I prefer it even because even bad weeks are at least bad at a fair rate.
But to compete with the rates you just showed we’d need to be around $33-34/hour to stay competitive on straight time so I see where you’re coming from now.
It's an outdated arcaiac law. The right thing to do is pay OT!! Simple as that .
Yes he does.Like I said earlier there was a case in Florida back in 2016 that I believe the same lawyer firm took another trucking company to court over dispatcher's and switcher's and they won.I wish I could post it here.I have never figured out how to post link's.
Is that the actual text from the 1935 law??? If it is, we all know this industry has changed a hundredfold since 1935. My point is, this law needs to be scrapped and re-written to match current industry conditions. And things can, and MUST, be changed. Women never had the right to vote...and after the suffrage movement, they got it. Alcohol was legal, then made illegal, then made legal again. It can be done, folks. Make it so.
Hold your finger on the story until the box pops up,and shows the word, copy. Touch copy. Then go to TB,reply,and hold finger on area where you would type words. When you see the word,paste,touch it,and the link will appear.
The big yards can’t afford to get rid of the switchers. Trailers don’t always get immediately worked on arrival or dispatched once they’re loaded. Empty trailers needing to doors, more city vans coming in from the street than there are doors, it would be a zoo, more so than now. Smaller yards often make their switcher work the dock too. This would be a big step toward overtime for all hourly employees, and it needs to happen.
Separate names with a comma.