Remember the Minnesota bridge collaspe last Aug?

SevenOfNine

TB Lurker
Credits
0
It seems that a design flaw is at fault. Which is what many were saying but now it seems to be confirmed.

WASHINGTON — Federal investigators have identified a design flaw as the cause of last year's Interstate 35W Minneapolis bridge collapse that killed 13 people, a congressional official said Tuesday.

The official, who was briefed by the National Transportation Safety Board, said that investigators found a design flaw in the bridge's gusset plates, which are the steel plates that tie steel beams together. The official spoke on the condition of anonymity so as not to pre-empt an update being provided later Tuesday by the NTSB chairman, Mark V. Rosenker.

The findings are consistent with what the NTSB said about a week after the Aug. 1 collapse, in which the bridge plunged into the Mississippi River. At the time, the NTSB said it had found issues with the collapsed bridge's gusset plates, but expected a full investigation to take more than a year.

At the time, Transportation Secretary Mary Peters advised states to consider the additional stress placed on bridges during construction projects. An 18-person crew was working on the bridge when it collapsed.

Nearly three months later, she told a gathering in Washington of a "working theory" of a poorly designed gusset plate and a heavy load of construction materials.

Meanwhile, state lawmakers announced plans last month to spend up to $500,000 to hire legal counsel to aid in a legislative inquiry into the collapse.

The bridge was deemed "structurally deficient" by the federal government as far back as 1990.

Late last year, President Bush signed a massive spending bill which included $195 million to help replace the bridge. That came on top of the $178.5 million the federal government has already given Minnesota for the project.
TheTrucker.com - America's Trucking Newspaper

Does this make any of you leery about crossing bridges in a big truck?

I know the president has signed a big spending bill to replace the bridge but what about the rest of the bridges in the US?

Should some of that money go to making sure these bridges do not have this same design flaw?
 
how can a bridge that was deemed "structurally deficient" in 1990 stiil being in operation in 2007?

goes to show how much politicians care for the people,to bad it's all about money nowadays.:nutkick:
 
the goverment went on a full scale inspection, and that rating includes rust, I want to say they said 90% of bridges fell in that category!
 
Don't want to be a naysayer but this sounds like a whitewash to me ------ gotta blame somebody and the people who designed the bridge and built it are no longer around so lets blame them.

Dave
 
Top