I found this:
This was awarded in June of 07, I don't know how long the company has to post it as a loss to earnings.
$3.25 million
Wrongful death/emotional distress
Doe, et al. v. Yellow Transportation, Inc., et al.
Jackson County Circuit Court
June 14, 2007
Plaintiffs' attorneys: Stanley J. Goodkin, St. Louis; Mark G. McMahon, St. Louis
Defense attorneys: Jack M. Strauch, Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, Winston-Salem, N.C.; Hal D. Meltzer, Baker Sterchi Cowden & Rice, Kansas City
The family of a motorcyclist struck and killed by a Yellow Transportation semitrailer reached a $3.25 million settlement in their Jackson County wrongful death case against the trucking company and its driver. The motorcyclist's wife, who witnessed the collision, also sought emotional distress and punitive damage claims.
"Evidence developed throughout discovery made it relatively clear that all three claims would be submitted to the jury," said lead plaintiffs' attorney Stanley J. Goodkin of St. Louis.
At 5 a.m. on Aug. 16, 2005, John Doe, 57, was driving his motorcycle eastbound on I-70 in Cooper County near Boonville. It was raining lightly and dark. His wife, Jane Doe, was driving her car about 150 to 200 feet behind her husband's motorcycle, both traveling in the right lane. The posted speed limit was 70 mph, but Mr. and Mrs. Doe were driving 50 to 55 mph because of the wet road conditions.
Two semitrailers passed Jane Doe -- the second being a Yellow Transportation Inc. rig driven by James Tasoulas. According to Jane Doe, Tasoulas was tailgating the first rig by driving about 30 feet behind it.
When he was about 100 feet in front of Jane Doe, Tasoulas maneuvered the YTI rig into the driving lane and struck the rear of her husband's motorcycle.
Jane Doe and her adult daughter filed a wrongful death claim against YTI and Tasoulas. Jane Doe filed a separate claim of negligent infliction of emotional distress for having witnessed her husband being struck on his motorcycle and later dying on the highway.
After mediation failed in March 2007, the matter was set for trial on June 25. About 10 days before trial, while both motions for summary judgment were pending, the parties reached the settlement.