So if the union is the problem, what exactly is the problem with the union? I look at other companies top rates are and we make a dollar more maybe less in some cases and a couple cents more on mileage..we pay for medical..I could list a bunch of nonunion companies that have gone under...I am not sure of how profitable ABF actually is from traditional LTL, Seems like you are combing through the details I do not. I am aware of some non asset and non traditional LTL business they move. However, I will show you a short list of unsuccessful union carriers for you convenience:
CF, St Johnsbury, Hemmingway, Churchill, Red Star, System 99, Milne, CCC, Nations Way, APA, Branch, Mason-Dixon, McLean, Boss-Linco, Maslin, Pilot, Spector, Eastern/Associated, Holmes, Sanborn, Highway Express, Lyons, Stott & Davis, Cooper- Jarrett, NEMF, Bilkay's, Schuster, Beacon, North Penn, Penn Yan, Quinn, Oneida and the list goes on.
You find ONE union carrier that may be profitable and base you viewpoint on that???
If these all were management failures then why do companies succeed when these same managers go non union carriers? That pay more and spend more on cap ex for safer equipment and facilities???
Looks to me that the union is the problem......
And just so you know before you call me a union lover..I'm not pro union..nor am I against it...as far as I can see the only benefit I get from the Teamsters is some job protections....