It's a first step.Rejected ?? But it didn't solve the problem ??? Point is that the fund is going broke and by continue to pay out full amounts will just make it go broke faster !!
True... But no more petty cash... It's all gone!
Union hall.
No have to disagree with that we shouldn't make cuts now , because WHY should these guys keep getting 100% $2500 to $3500. a month ,while we end up with maybe $200- $300 bucks a month , by waiting to make cuts ???It's a first step.
What's in the future and what can be done? Who knows.
It's gonna go broke either way.
Slowly... Or quickly. Doesn't matter.
But this gives us... them time to do something... Anything... Investigate? Look into it. See what went where? Who knows.
Would it have been better to just slash them now?
I personally don't think so.
I do not see myself getting anything anyways.
All we can do now is see what we can do... and what will happen.
Makes them go back and figure this crap out. Because it's common sense someone did something wrong and it's common sense it wrong what they did to us.
Illegal?
I see a lot of merit to what you say. One difference is that the guys who are retired probably can't go back to work while those in the work force are forced to stay longer. What will probably happen is that the CSPF will be taken over by the PBGC and all pensions will be cut according to their formulas all across the board, 80 year old, disabled retires et al. It is going to put everyone in that fund in a bad predicament and if that isn't a recipe for civil unrest I don't know what is. Shove a man into a corner when he's nearing the end of his life and take what's left of his life away and he will get pretty mad and act irrationally. I don't see how it can't happen.Am I wrong to think that this just screws all the guys that are still working while the guys who are already retired get full pension? What am I missing? I feel bad for those guys, but I think they probably made more money and had it better back then compared to what is going on today. What about equal pain for everyone? These people that say it gives us more time, what is going to happen with more time other than the pie will be smaller to try and figure out how to give everyone a small pension instead of the retired guys getting their big piece and the guys who are out here busting their asses now getting the crumbs. If I am wrong please explain what I am missing. thanks!
Don't you agree that if you factor in the current MOU and inflation and all the other factors that the guys who are retired made much more money than current workers if you factor in cost of living and everything? So they made more money the have had a full pension for as long as they have been retired and now they don't want to share the pain? I guess I don't get it. The fact that I have to work several years or more older than I was planning on should somehow be offset by the fact that the retired guy can't go back to work....huh?I see a lot of merit to what you say. One difference is that the guys who are retired probably can't go back to work while those in the work force are forced to stay longer. What will probably happen is that the CSPF will be taken over by the PBGC and all pensions will be cut according to their formulas all across the board, 80 year old, disabled retires et al. It is going to put everyone in that fund in a bad predicament and if that isn't a recipe for civil unrest I don't know what is. Shove a man into a corner when he's nearing the end of his life and take what's left of his life away and he will get pretty mad and act irrationally. I don't see how it can't happen.
It would be about $1100 for those with 30 years in. The rest requires a Crystal Ball, could be a higher amount, could be lower or not at all. Sad if one wants to throw others under the bus on what might happen, as is I got mine so who cares.Does anybody know one hundred percent for sure an answer to the following question: Am I correct that if the fund went totally broke in ten years or so that there is a government guarantee that you would get about eleven hundred dollars? Am I also correct that at anytime congress could change that to a different amount or even eliminate it?
It would be about $1100 for those with 30 years in. The rest requires a Crystal Ball, could be a higher amount, could be lower or not at all. Sad if one wants to throw others under the bus on what might happen, as is I got mine so who cares.
I guess it was a Ponzi I put in 25 yrs haven't retired yet, so I haven't collected a dollar yet and Iam 67. So I agree not fair those guys been collecting full benfits from 53 yrs old what do I get so far zero. What this does it well uncover some illegal things that was done.