- Credits
- 547
Yellow | ¡Faltan 13 días más!
- Thread starter Kennesaw Kid
- Start date
- Credits
- 547
Per Yellow Lawsuit....
- Credits
- 150
Per Yellow Lawsuit....
That is the number that should scare O'Brien, $1.5 billion, because that is what Yellow will claim in damages from the IBT.
The contract requires a hearing on a proposed COO.
It was the union that rejected the COO and demanded a reopening of the contract to which Yellow agreed.
Now O'Brien refuses to sit at the table and negotiate.
slavenomore
TB Legend
- Credits
- 809
It's July 16.
Cab Lizzard
TB Veteran
- Credits
- 579
Yellow wanted to change up their operation which they were allowed to do under the present contract.
Their One Yellow COO contained some language that would require them to sit down and negotiate . New language and operation affecting the membership Yellow said NO we need it now. Thats where it's at now.
Anyone who has been around 15 or 20 years knows their is a process to the opening of the NMFA and that is what the IBT is doing. It's a process it takes a bit of time.
Ever think about Yellow crawling along doing nothing all these years then out of nowhere we are broke and need this to survive
Not the first time the membership has heard this. .
Remember the money for the raise that they don't have ?
Want to defer H&W payments for 2 months ?
Sounds to me they need to look in the mirror and deal with their management team and get somone in their to run this circus and get a new crew of clowns to run it day to day.
.
clydesdale
TB Veteran
- Credits
- 289
Remember that time when Yellow pulled out of the master freight agreement because they wanted to pay the employees in the south east less because of the cost of living??? I do … nice people.
Last edited:
No F-bdy Bs
TB Veteran
- Credits
- 592
MaSSivE diSRuptIoN tO teH sUPPly ChainZ!!!
Lol, go home Yellow. Yer drunk.
Lol, go home Yellow. Yer drunk.
Puff Driver
TB Veteran
- Credits
- 416
WOW you called this one.....
Just a refresher. The COO was rejected because it violated our current contract. Because the union refused to violate a contract isn't grounds for a $1.5B lawsuit. May I also remind you Yellow has everything in place to merge all companies into "One Yellow" in the contract. What they don't have is the right disregard job titles, follow the work rules and violate seniority.
You union haters are all the same.
- Credits
- 150
What COO? What the union told Yellow is what they proposed was a violation of the contract and not a COO. Now explain to me how I'm wrong. Yellow already has the authority to merge all the companies into "One yellow" but it must stay within the contract boundaries. If upper management would have been a little smarter about the whole situation they would have merged us together now and worked out the new work rules in the next contract next year but they choose to push the nuclear button and here we are.
Since you have no vested interest in this you really should STFU and stop stirring the pot.
- Credits
- 150
Yeah, I get it, and probably better than you. Unlike you, this actually affects me. What Yellow asked for was a complete violation of a negotiated contract, not a COO. You do understand what a contract is, don't you? As far as H&W is concerned, there IS NO STIPULATION IN THE CONTRACT FOR NOT PAYING IT IF YOU WANT TO SAVE SOME CASH THIS MONTH. Yellow not paying H&W is no different than not paying vendors or the bank loans. It's pretty simple and straightforward. Your work force pay and H&W isn't something you pay only if you have the extra cash that month!
I believe most of the bonuses were in the form of stock options. Yellow stock is virtually worthless and plummeting. They are Cash Poor. I believe Yellow is finished. So they are looking for ways to blame an end of the company on the IBT.