Head through the grapevine that a big pay raise is coming May 1st for ALL new hires to keep them at YRC. Pay rates the same for 30 days up to Senior employees pay rates.
Anybody heard any more on this?
Do you always have to be negative WTF.If you don't like what you have or don't like your just quit while your a head - 15 %SWEET , & in 2019 lets bump it up to -20% giveback these guys need our money !! and SURE our Good Buddy Hoffa will be monitoring the situation ??
Lotta emojies there.... However u Spell it.Do you always have to be negative WTF.If you don't like what you have or don't like your just quit while your a head - 15 %
roadboss I'm being POSITIVE , I said SWEET and think we should give them more of our paycheck and I'm VERY GRATEFUL for having a job with YRCW and VERY GRATEFUL to be paying Dues so my Great Union Leader Hoffa & his crew can retire with FULL PENSIONS !! so roadboss "DON'T' WORRY BE HAPPY "Do you always have to be negative WTF.If you don't like what you have or don't like your just quit while your a head - 15 %
If true, it would mean modifying the existing MOU wouldn't it ? And if they can modify it for new hires they can modify it for the rest of us. Just an opinion.Head through the grapevine that a big pay raise is coming May 1st for ALL new hires to keep them at YRC. Pay rates the same for 30 days up to Senior employees pay rates.
Anybody heard any more on this?
If true, it would mean modifying the existing MOU wouldn't it ? And if they can modify it for new hires they can modify it for the rest of us. Just an opinion.
Something makes me think that this happened somewhere before but I can't remember who and where. I believe that the outcome was that they were able to do it in spite of what had been voted on. It doesn't seem right because it changes what was voted on and might not have passed with the new changes. Then, at ABF, the company wanted to give back vacation time to new hires only and not to the senior drivers and they were told that they couldn't do it, it was all for one and one for all.
http://www.truckingboards.com/bb/threads/checkmate-abf.67007/Something makes me think that this happened somewhere before but I can't remember who and where. I believe that the outcome was that they were able to do it in spite of what had been voted on. It doesn't seem right because it changes what was voted on and might not have passed with the new changes. Then, at ABF, the company wanted to give back vacation time to new hires only and not to the senior drivers and they were told that they couldn't do it, it was all for one and one for all.
Yeah, I thought it felt close to home but I just couldn't place it. We don't use part timers at my shop so I am separated from it. I do remember being perturbed about it.
Screw who you can, cater to who you have to, it's the new American way of doing business.
They're appearing to make it so everyone makes the equal top rate? No one is being grieved by that.
I don't have a problem with that.
