It all depends on the issue? It could need to be dovetailing, endtailing or neither one? Yes, endtailing is fair if that is what the contract calls for in the specific issue its used in. Your poll question needs to have more information for the members to answer this question correctly.
It's got to get better when they close Holland. I hate to see them close but you would have to be blind deaf and dumb not to see the writing on the wall. The COO put endtail in concrete so there is really no reason to keep them open. If YRC retains the freight some guys will be called back. With YRC's service record they may not keep alot of the freight. Who knows, if they intend on closing them it will probably be before the end of the 2nd quarter. Hang in there till then. Let me state again I hope this doesn't happen, I'm just looking at the cut throat bunch of creeps that run the joint.
If YRC wins endtail agreements at Richmond and Wichita concerning the Holland closure in those locations, they will make the 42 million buy closing Holland. I hope this doesn't happen but YRC is just testing the IBT to see if they will allow an endtail into YRC. Once they are allowed to do it, they will close all of Holland and hope the customers will rollover to YRC.
The stage has been set just waiting for act two.
http://www.tdu.org/files/USFDecision.pdf
It's an IBT decision. it has nothing to do with TDU. It used to be an old Teamster idea that if you took a carriers business and equipment you would at least take the men. I know in the mester generation that is unheard of but why would a company in the position that YRC is in keep a company intact when they could cut costs by taking the customers and closing the facilities and make an agreement that would almost never make them hire any of the displaced workers. We'll see. I give Holland no longer than the end of June. I hope I'm wrong. Mesters, don't worry you'll be fine and maybe busy.
I don't understand how people don't understand plain english.
I never said anything against Holland or it's workers.
I hope Holland is around forever.
What makes me mad as hell is the IBT allowing the company to close 11 locations and the company telling customers that shipping with YRC or New Penn is just as good, while endtailing the Holland employees.
The Holland employees built that business, they deserve to be dovetailed into these barns and I don't give a rats a** about anybody who thinks otherwise.
Sorry!!!!
I'm going to add some of your own quotes so everybody understands you and the poll better. I think there has been a misunderstanding about what you're trying to ask and/or say. This should help everyone, I hope?
I think it was first read by some, as you were saying it was already a done deal but you were only stating your own opinion. If YRCW was allowed to do this then YRCW might decide to use it against all of Holland, I think we understand it better now.
A lot of difference between following a contract and what is maraly fair.Just my 2 cents
I think we all understand the issue better now.It all depends on the issue? It could need to be dovetailing, endtailing or neither one? Yes, endtailing is fair if that is what the contract calls for in the specific issue its used in. Your poll question needs to have more information for the members to answer this question correctly.
Ok Cujo, now i'm not pissed anymore. You just burnt me up when I read your one post about closing Holland! I getcha now! Thanks Benny for the clear up!Thanks for the clarification.
Where did endtailing happen? Was it Holland guys going to New Penn?
Do you think endtailing is fair?
As for me I say no endtailing. Seniority rules
No end tailing is not fair in my opinion.
Just remember what you say now, it might be happening to you if YRC needs more $$s to scape in. :Flame-On::TR10driving03:why should you be able to dovetail at a company where you had no seniority. endtailing is the correct way.
why should you be able to dovetail at a company where you had no seniority. endtailing is the correct way.