Yellow | Great Day For Teamster Retirees, Present & Future!

Guess that didn't effect people who retired under the old rules I have a friend in Cleveland retired at 48 and is now 73 been collecting full pension for 25yrs

And that is part of the problem. Pension plans in general were not designed to pay out benefits for such a long time. Originally they were meant to provide funds for a much shorter time of retirement - say 65 till end-of-life not that many years later. All the changes starting payouts at a younger age and our longevity increasing has stressed the plans. The math just doesn't work.
 
With pensions better funded, the employers cost of withdrawing from the fund will now be lowered, and more of a possibility of that now happening, next few years should be interesting.
Actually the withdrawal liability will not change till after 15 years.
 
Ok, does anybody know what the reduction per year before 65 is?
I was doing a kick in Milwaukee this week and chatting with a city guy he was telling me they have 40 guys who are 60+. With the pension reform it sure does make you wonder how many guys will be out of here.
Whoever told you that there are 40 guys over 60 in Milwaukee is exaggerating.
 
And that is part of the problem. Pension plans in general were not designed to pay out benefits for such a long time. Originally they were meant to provide funds for a much shorter time of retirement - say 65 till end-of-life not that many years later. All the changes starting payouts at a younger age and our longevity increasing has stressed the plans. The math just doesn't work.

And the same goes for Social Security. When it first came about you were eligible at 65 and life expectancy was 67. Speaking of SS, it's over $16 trillion underfunded, didn't get a nickel while the dems had the money bazooka out. That's old candy, funding that doesn't buy new votes.
 
You will get back pay for all of your reductions, your pension will be completely restored.
What part of "as of the date of enactment" don't you understand?

1) IN GENERAL.—The amount of financial assistance provided to a multiemployer plan eligible for financial assistance under this section shall be such amount required for the plan to pay all benefits due during the period beginning on the date of payment of the special financial assistance payment under this section and ending on the last day of the plan year ending in 2051, with no reduction in a participant’s or beneficiary’s accrued benefit as of the date of enactment of this section, except to the extent of a reduction in accordance with section 305(e)(8) adopted prior to the plan’s application for special financial assistance under this section, and taking into account the reinstatement of benefits required under subsection (k).
 
reinstatement of benefits required under subsection (k).
Page 562 of house bill. Ask the dead beats from Upstate NY, they are getting $67,000 in back pay. Won't be a lump some, that would put them in a higher tax bracket. God forbid the tax payer get some of their money back.
 
Page 562 of house bill. Ask the dead beats from Upstate NY, they are getting $67,000 in back pay. Won't be a lump some, that would put them in a higher tax bracket. God forbid the tax payer get some of their money back.
What do younger members get a continuation of 25% contribution rate and a small reduced pension screw the new people. It's so depressing hearing fellow drivers talking about retiring pensions while I don't get one.
 
What part of "as of the date of enactment" don't you understand?
Most people would thank me if I told them they were getting back pay and their pension cut reinstated. You had no call to get snippy with me, an apology is in order. Go to "pension tsunami" one of the articles mentions how fat, dumb and happy pensioners will be because they are getting back pay.
 
Top