As an employee, you come to work to trade your efforts/skills for compensation, that's it. The CEO's job is to plan for ways to make the company grow and become more profitable in the future. If that means proposing something that makes the employees unhappy so be it. That's not a primary factor in making his decisions. That's just a fact of life, like it or not. The way so many of you act, you would expect the company to exist solely to pay you what you think you deserve (regardless of what the majority agreed to in a vote) and put everyone back to work regardless of the need for all those people. We voted to accept a pay cut - live with it.
The last two purchases did turn out to be bad moves, primarily because of the severe downturn in the economy. Who knows how things might have turned out if the recession hadn't happened. We might all be complaining about having to work too much.
Yes WE collectively voted a paycut, pension destruction, vacation giveback, etc because the company said (three times) "this is all we need to survive" SURVIVE! Not run up even more debt, eliminate half the teamsters who collectively voted for concessions, reinvest practically zero into the company, and keep the overbloated management team who created this cluster $&@# in the first place employed. Now they want to borrow even more money they have zero chance of ever paying back, to buy another company because they can't fill their trailers with the over discounted garbge they are currently hauling.