Where do you get the idea that I'm upset, just because I disagree with your statements? Get a grip. Where in the article does it say that a "better" proposal was rejected? Are you just imagining things that aren't there? You're the one that said a "worse" contract was being proposed. The article clearly states that the latest proposal contains a "promise of higher wages and contained healthcare costs". It also appears to modify previous conditions in some way that aren't totally clear. How does any of that make it a "worse" offer?