I didn't get that memo on any employee initiative...
Not a surprise. That's why you come to TB for the most up to date info.
I didn't get that memo on any employee initiative...
$21 million lost ???? come on JAMIE you don't need that much HAIR GEL !!!! but really it's all a numbers game and yrcw will never ever show profit , cause if they did the banks & lenders &vendors & union & pension fund would be wanting some money back , think about it !!!
Well why do you think they bought the new equipment, to help offset that pesky profit they would have to show!!!
$21 million lost ???? come on JAMIE you don't need that much HAIR GEL !!!! but really it's all a numbers game and yrcw will never ever show profit , cause if they did the banks & lenders &vendors & union & pension fund would be wanting some money back , think about it !!!
That may be because e-mail moves as slow as the freight @ 511 ????I didn't get that memo on any employee initiative...
Read your post again.
Is that your true belief?
I don't know. I just started here, and I have a friend who has worked here for a long time. after hearing about this for YEARS, I don't worry about the financials, as it seems like our employer is running a back alley 3 card Monte game with their money. did you honestly think they were going to SHARE their profits with you?
Given the enormous size and age of YRCF's capital stock (tractors & trailers), normal replacement costs are well beyond our means. Containing other costs which are manageable (cargo claims, W/C, fuel, tires, and accidents) is essential. The goals, as Elwood has pointed out, are achievable. But not without effort from all.
The self preservation instincts are questionable for more than a few!You cannot be suggesting employees actively participate in cost reduction practices voluntarily?
That is preposterous!
That's funny. But true.That may be because e-mail moves as slow as the freight @ 511 ????
Just your job to do the best you can at what ever you do.II always here people say that they are doing 15% less work just answer this if we would have gone out of business and you got another job making what we are now would you do 15% less for that employer and how long do you think you would have that job if you did?You cannot be suggesting employees actively participate in cost reduction practices voluntarily?
That is preposterous!
Elwood, Triplex, are you guys buying or recommending buying at YRCW shares at 14.09?Why is it dropping so much?
Perhaps you could write off your free advice as "charity" on next years taxes...Or maybe bill me an outlandish fee that doesn't get paid and claim a loss. Thanks.
You don't know?
If every bargaining employee were driving brand new equipment, then just maybe I might believe it was all purchased with the intent of reducing profit margins to avoid profit sharing.
A few hundred tractors to replace a decrepit fleet; not so much.
Do I believe they will 'share' their profits, yes.
Do I believe the numbers required to achieve this 'profit sharing' are out of line?
Absolutely. The reward for which to strive is outlandish, but is achievable.
Reduce accidents, injuries and claims by 80 -90%
ok, how bout this, I DO KNOW. why WOULDN'T they lie and bluff, to put themselves in a better position? and why not purchase the equipment after their PROFITABLE quarter, before the "profit sharing"? between the new equipment, the return of the 401k match for the NON union employee's, and their change in compensation for the guys running this sham, i'd say they are pretty good at hiding their money. if you are waiting for any "sharing" from yrcw, i'd pack a lot of dry toast, Elwood......
ok, how bout this, I DO KNOW. why WOULDN'T they lie and bluff, to put themselves in a better position? and why not purchase the equipment after their PROFITABLE quarter, before the "profit sharing"? between the new equipment, the return of the 401k match for the NON union employee's, and their change in compensation for the guys running this sham, i'd say they are pretty good at hiding their money. if you are waiting for any "sharing" from yrcw, i'd pack a lot of dry toast, Elwood......
Guess if i'm going to comment, I'll have to footnote (#1 and the thread noted) on the snarky thread,???You say you just started here but you already profess to know all about how YRCW is "hiding" money?
ok, how bout this, I DO KNOW. why WOULDN'T they lie and bluff, to put themselves in a better position? and why not purchase the equipment after their PROFITABLE quarter, before the "profit sharing"? between the new equipment, the return of the 401k match for the NON union employee's, and their change in compensation for the guys running this sham, i'd say they are pretty good at hiding their money. if you are waiting for any "sharing" from yrcw, i'd pack a lot of dry toast, Elwood......
Refer again to the footnoted #1 of this thread on the snarky thread.What do you know? You are making assumptions without stating any facts.
The expenditures you mention are insignificant in the overall scope of things and are sound investments needed to improve the fleet and also maintain the skeleton management crew remaining.
The executive compensation packages, while exorbitant are in line with norms and most of that package includes stock options, not excessive salaries.
Show me evidence of 'hidden monies' and I may be swayed to take your position into consideration.