Question: Why has the company never shared in a possible profit? Shouldn't this be in every contract? What I am saying is there should be a yearly assessment as to whether there is extra money for wages. That is what everyone wants right? Fine, they don't pay any debt, but if the profits suddenly rise then the wages should too?
Yellow | Some Interesting Facts That Happened At 318 Bolingbrook
- Thread starter Kennesaw Kid
- Start date
Go get a cdl!
That would be profit sharing... there is a profit sharing clause (whatever you want to call it) in the contract... the company does good you get something .....
Follow Da Monie
TB Lurker
- Credits
- 0
Praxair.. Industrial and Medical gas supplier.
Follow Da Monie
TB Lurker
- Credits
- 0
Ahhhhh... I see... You seem a little stressed.. But thanks TB police officer!!
Follow Da Monie
TB Lurker
- Credits
- 0
How's that????
Yet the current management team has had over two years to set some sort of correction and have completely FAILED to do so. YRC management has proven to be the best in one field. MISMANAGEMENT!!!
Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.
Albert Einstein
Right on!!! Management has failed and continues to fail day after day!!! They continue doing the same things over and over again and expecting different results. They have failed to make systemic changes at every operational level that would have paid off the massive debt by now. The most important reason management has failed to make these systemic changes is their arrogant and pompous belief that they are expert in every operational function and they know best. They have failed to respect their expert employees' opinions, suggestions and cost-saving ideas. Until we get rid of these fools and replace them with those who have learned to truly and humbly listen with the intent to effectuate real changes, we will continue to fail. Our ship is going down because Management has failed and continues to fail day after day!!! They continue doing the same things over and over again and expecting different results!!
TonyMArdwy2018
TB Lurker
- Credits
- 0
That's because KK has already gotten himself on the movie list..... lot easier to talk tough when you got a job waiting in the wings lol
Losses have dropped from $250 million to $50 million if I remember right. Think that was the last couple years. If management is so bad, how did that happen? Granted, there are more stupid things being done daily, and the economy still sux. Yeah, there is no respect, because reducing cost has been so important. But we still jam and cram freight, for lload average, and pay 30 million in claims dollars. Save OTR dollars to give it up in claims.
I was actually honestly asking you a question... was trying to figure out if it was you or another poster... I don't really keep up with "who said what" I just remember what was said... Sorry to have irritated you... that was not my intent.
I will refrain from asking you questions.. if I can remember who you are...
So the company that sells you a car can restart your note to zero paid and you will start over whenever they desire? Good attitude to have. The banks really appreciate your business. Instead of you financing a car for 5 years the would love to start you over and have you paying ten.
The original MOU said they could and would fix the debt in five years which is why many voted yes the first time. (I did vote NO then also because I saw this coming) Now they are saying the same thing and the sheep that are scared of any type of fight are saying "OK, we will not fight, please take what you want and leave us alone." Grow a pair already!!!
Can you please show me where it said what I underlined? Thanks.
snake eyes
TB Veteran
- Credits
- 81
Local 710 doing there vote at the terminals?
I do not have that in print. Otherwise my house would be full of YRC propaganda over the past years. I do tend to toss garbage where it belongs. But are you telling me that you believe that is NOT what the MOU was intended to do? Is your head buried in the sand while the rest of us fight for whats right?
bigtruk_us
TB Legend
- Credits
- 0
I believe alot of us including me are missing the point.I know you and the rest of us are wondering what happened to the 3.4bil dollars we lent them over the years?In all the history of the freight business.YRCW has spent an olympian record amount of our give back money.Comparatively speaking about other freight companies.They havent even came close to the 3.4bil expenditures of yrcw.Something is dead serious wrong here.Blame it on mismanagement or whatever.Most supervisors on the dock only make about 25k a year.And other salaried workers are a little better but not enough to have dented that 3.4billion.I suspect but i do not know for a fact.That somewhere in this organization there has been some wrongdoings.Cmon how does 3.4bil just disappear and nobody has an answer for us?When that kind of money disappears one would have to really suspect something.This isnt the kind of money that you can drop into a kitty litter box and cover up with sand.If this company goes to BK court.The presiding judge will ask for records of all accounting.I think this is where some folks will be getting a tad bit nervous.Sooooo to stave off BK we have this little vote you see.With a yes vote.The damage will not be divulged.Then they can go into this little refi game.So why would you vote yes to something and practically esponge any wrongdoers and then give them more of our money and rights?Beats me.All the company will be doing is kicking the can down the road.the company still has that 1.4billion debt that has never been paid down.It was 1.4 billion a few years ago.No accusations to anyone.Excuse me 3.4billion dollars is missing.what say you all?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I317 using Tapatalk
Didn't tell you anything, simply asked you a question. Are you so defensive that you need the snarky "head buried in the sand" comment?
You are right and for that, I'm sorry. Have you seen some of the postings on here? Some really are "snarky" and my assumption was that your comment was in the same tone.
