Back in the day all those jobs were Union with pensions now we are going backwards child labor again.
Kids as young as 14 were found working at a Tennessee factory that makes lawn mower parts
Immigrant children as young as 14 were found working amid heavy equipment at a Tennessee firm that makes parts for lawn mowers sold by John Deere and others.www.yahoo.com
If ya know anybody looking for work, this company should be hiring pretty soon.
some still believe it wasn't
The court dismissed it on procedural grounds, not factual. Don't order the caviar yet for your celebration party.
That's right Triplex! As long as these vultures (law firms) smell any $$$ left on the Yellow carcass, they will continue to go after it!The court dismissed it on procedural grounds, not factual. Don't order the caviar yet for your celebration party.
The court dismissed it on procedural grounds, not factual. Don't order the caviar yet for your celebration party.
You just quoted it yourself in your post, it's what the judge said. Maybe you should call the judge and tell her she's wrong, there's nothing to grieve.NOT COURT PROCEDURAL!!!!!!!!!!
At this point, it’s impossible to have the grievance process, their nothing to grieve.
I guess it depends on where we’re standing, from my viewpoint I see the number 9, but from where your standing you may see the number six.
This may make you feel better, I once lost a grievance because i wrote the wrong date on it, but luckily, I refilled it before the time expired, and won.
Can you share with me which procedural grounds your are referring to. I can’t seem to find it.
How does Yellow even grieve such a thing now? Do you think that they are going to follow the grievance process in the NMFA and ask for 137 million? First thing I can think of is it wouldn't be timely.... I think this part of their problem is done. I don't see how the bankruptcy process allows them to keep spending money to fight this....I could be wrong on all this as I'm not a lawyer, just my opinion...You just quoted it yourself in your post, it's what the judge said. Maybe you should call the judge and tell her she's wrong, there's nothing to grieve.
I don't believe it's about going back to exhaust the grievance process, but rather being able to give enough evidence to prove that the grievance process has been exhausted. The court appointed US Trustee is a disinterested party. One of their duties is to pursue all civil matters where they believe one exists. They are obligated to protect the interest of the creditors. IF they believe there's something there, they can choose to bring it back to court IF the case was dismissed without prejudice.
Thanks for the reply, it will be interesting on how this plays out...
Just my opinion.
In your last sentence/statement (warn act violation ) who is YRC a victim to, themselves?
O'BRIEN AND MURPHY HAD NO CHOICE BUT TO ENFORCE ALL OF THESE AGREEMENTS, OR THEY BOTH WOULD HAVE BEEN BROUGHT UP ON CHARGES UNDER THE IBT CONSTITUTION. HAWKINS AND HIS HENCHMEN WANTED TO TRASH ALL THESE AGREEMENTS THAT HAD BEEN IN EFFECT FOR DECADES! THAT'S NOT HOW IT WORKS! I HOPE HAWKINS, HARRIS, AND THE REST OF THE YELLOW EXECS HANG THEIR HEADS IN SHAME AFTER WHAT THEY DID TO THESE TRUCKING COMPANIES!
