The government is the ones that set the rules for how the pensions operate that the funds must follow. The government is also the ones that deregulated freight back in 1980 that was the start of this whole mess. So, the government has had plenty of time to help figure out a way to prevent this bail out that was eventually needed to restore the underfunded pensions. The various funds in a lot of cases did make some poor investment decisions, but with the deregulation and then the government oversight of the various MEPF, government bares as much blame if not more than the funds do. Around 1998, I remember that the Central States Pension Fund was very well funded. If I remember correctly, it was funded at over 90%. The fund decided to do higher payouts to get this number below the 90% to avoid additional taxes and the government did not object. The fund also changed the rules by adding the 25 and out at any age to help get the funding under the 90% mark for tax purposes and the government did not object. As the fund (Central States) was under government oversight and had to follow the governments rules, why did they not object to these changes to keep the fund well funded?