needless to say, I agree with most of your comments on your last post. I belive that Carolina would have gone down and very well almost took ABF down within 1 day of going out of business.
I am part of the western region, so I wasn't really affected by the endtailing/dovetailing. It was my understanding that the end tail was part of the deal, but then the Teamsters backed off (I won't debate that).
You make a lot of good points, but the difference between you and me seem to be the Union mentality. I realize the company pays my wages, and we have to do all things possible to help the company deal with the non-union element. I like your comment about everyone having bad apples, you really can't lump all the people in one category.
So, BROTHER, we do have a lot in common. BUT, I am a company man first, Teamster second.
as far as the union mentality difference of opinion consider this
the seniority application was never part of the "deal"
it was always up to the COO committee from the get go
in fact while the deal was in progress mr young ark best ceo & i believe it was stubblefield the abf president
had together petitioned ron carey for an exception to the seniority application as they were well aware the type of impact it was going to have on abf employees, especially in the east & south this was well documented in transport topics
i myself spoke to mr carey about this subject at a labor day parade in nyc
with this knowledge they still proceeded with the deal and outright lied to their employees and blamed the negative impact on the IBT
consequently if i was you, i would reconsider that company first position
in the northeast & south, carolina operated there for many years before abf serviced those areas
for example in florida it was especially devastating
carolina was there "forever" & abf was the new kid on the block, so we are talking about almost total displacement
in the northeast it was fairly even with only the bottom guys (with less than 3-4 yrs seniority) from either side getting the pink slip
in the west there was no impact as carolina did not service those areas directly
we interlined with our non union sister carrier GI trucking
GI by the way because of the merger lost any carolina westbound freight formed a seamless partnership with estes before the ink dried on the "consolodation"
this was due to the contractual conflict of a "double breasting" situation if the interline agreement continued
GI serviced almost identical areas abf already covered
nice little tidbit; mr young or possibly a family member (not entirely sure) was one of the controlling board members of estees at the time and may still be
arkbest shortly thereafter recouped a good portion of the 133 mil spent on the deal
sold cardinal freight carriers
sold some carolina terminals including the break bulk in PA
sold GI trucking
liquidated excess office & vehicle equipment
added aditional service points & retained the good freight
so in essence it was a good business deal for the company
i do not know if after the deal abf came within 1 day of going out of business though
sure it was a rough several months when the intergration began
most of those problems (losses) were attributable to the management's methods of operation combining which, explaining it would make this post twice as long
i appologize for going off topic