I was hung out during our one (1) information/explanation meeting so I did not get to hear what was said. From some earlier posts (I already admitted to being a lazy researcher so I don't remember which ones off-hand), it was mentioned that the ACTUAL "memorandum of understanding" expanding on the agreements reached in implementing the new articles in the NMFA was read but not distributed.
PJ, in his post attachment, explained that a memorandum of that type has been held in court to be legally binding subject to some restrictions.
By not distributing the "memorandum of understanding" between TMI and the Teamsters Union, both of those parties have eliminated to possibility of rank and file members forcing both parties to hew to the argreements in the NMFA as they are understood by the negotiators.
If you trust the companies AND the union officials, no problem.
If you doubt the integrity of the companies and the top level of union officials....BIG PROBLEM.
Thus my dilemma: if the articles of the proposed NMFA are not spelled out clearly, with those grey areas supposedly covered by non-contract "agreements, we (the actual workers) do not have a leg to stand on if, after ratification, we find that things are not working out as we presumed they would.
So, I still say VOTE NO....but yes or no, vote!
PJ, in his post attachment, explained that a memorandum of that type has been held in court to be legally binding subject to some restrictions.
By not distributing the "memorandum of understanding" between TMI and the Teamsters Union, both of those parties have eliminated to possibility of rank and file members forcing both parties to hew to the argreements in the NMFA as they are understood by the negotiators.
If you trust the companies AND the union officials, no problem.
If you doubt the integrity of the companies and the top level of union officials....BIG PROBLEM.
Thus my dilemma: if the articles of the proposed NMFA are not spelled out clearly, with those grey areas supposedly covered by non-contract "agreements, we (the actual workers) do not have a leg to stand on if, after ratification, we find that things are not working out as we presumed they would.
So, I still say VOTE NO....but yes or no, vote!