[quote author=rightturn link=topic=78906.msg819102#msg819102 date=1270330920]
[quote author=Dude-PWB- link=topic=78906.msg819052#msg819052 date=1270318970]
Apparently this 'new vacation policy' was attempted in Canada but it didn't pan out for them. Any company can choose how their employees accrue vacation time, however, at the end of the day, it has to work out to two weeks per year for years 1-6 and 3 weeks per year thereafter. The accrual has always been based on a Jan-Dec (12 month) system, by which any vacation time earned in that year, was given the next year (after Jan 1st).
When they tried to implement the 'new policy' it was pointed out to them by Labour Canada that they would then be required to double the vacation time and vacation pay for the following year because the vacation time and pay had already been earned previously, and would continue to be earned going forward.
Needless to say, the new policy lost traction in a big hurry in Canada.
[/quote] That is very , very interesting and sounds quite logical. Can anyone verify this, could open a whole new can of worms. :banana:
[/quote]
At the end of the day when you run a b@st@rd operation...based upon screwing the very people that work for you...
You are still a b@[email protected]rdless of the spin....
Rat
[quote author=Dude-PWB- link=topic=78906.msg819052#msg819052 date=1270318970]
Apparently this 'new vacation policy' was attempted in Canada but it didn't pan out for them. Any company can choose how their employees accrue vacation time, however, at the end of the day, it has to work out to two weeks per year for years 1-6 and 3 weeks per year thereafter. The accrual has always been based on a Jan-Dec (12 month) system, by which any vacation time earned in that year, was given the next year (after Jan 1st).
When they tried to implement the 'new policy' it was pointed out to them by Labour Canada that they would then be required to double the vacation time and vacation pay for the following year because the vacation time and pay had already been earned previously, and would continue to be earned going forward.
Needless to say, the new policy lost traction in a big hurry in Canada.
[/quote] That is very , very interesting and sounds quite logical. Can anyone verify this, could open a whole new can of worms. :banana:
[/quote]
At the end of the day when you run a b@st@rd operation...based upon screwing the very people that work for you...
You are still a b@[email protected]rdless of the spin....
Rat