Going out, it looks like it took you 4 3/4 hours and coming back roughly the same. You ran 596 miles divided by 2 equals 298 each way and divide that by 4 3/4 equals almost 63 MPH. You can't argue with the screen, it is what it is.That must have been one perfect day. No traffic, no bad weather, no construction and no anything else that might cause you to have to ease up a little. Unless, you are saying that your foot wasn't in it for the entire time of 4 3/4 hours. The simple math is you couldn't even lose 15 minutes and still make either half of that 596 miles in 4 3/4 hours.
Then you go to the other screen and there is the devil in the details. Hard brakes 0, fast acceleration 0, speeding 33/77.7 mph.
Am I reading this right? In a one day work cycle, you had 33 different occurrences of hitting up to 78 miles per hour? I believe you have posted, that your run is rolling hills or genuine mountainous terrain or both. Is that how you get those multiple almost 80 mph recordings? Is that where you are saving your time by rolling those hills at almost 80 mph?
Don't get me wrong, you're sitting in the seat and if that is what you want to do, more power to you. That's just not my style. Phil Williams, Pssst, I asked Dracula, he’s the one that is afraid to be behind us because we drive ‘too hard.’ However, I’m glad you proved my point, no reason anyone should worry about our abilities to manage a perfectly easy run. You're right Phil, damn straight, I would be afraid to be behind you. You're pulling heavy loaded pups,maybe even overweight pups, clocking multiple miles at up to almost 80 mph, and you describe that as only "hard driving". The run is finished with 9.37 hours of drive time. Why push so hard when you could burn some of that excess drive time and not record so much "hard driving" time? But, if that is what you want to do and your record shows that you're good at it, then have at it. Good luck.