Some people say the TDU is anti IBT is this a good thing or bad thing?
Teamsters for a Democratic Union
Teamsters for a Democratic Union
Some people say the TDU is anti IBT is this a good thing or bad thing?
Teamsters for a Democratic Union
Yes!!!!!!! TDU has had Tom Leedum run against Jimmy Hoffa in the last 2 General elections. He had no chance to win either election, knew he couldn't win and cost the IBT millions of dollars by getting just enough delegate votes to be able to run for the General President's job. Now generally, I would say more power to you but in this case it was B.S. and I will tell you why. First let me say that I am not a Jimmy Hoffa supporter, of course, that is unless Tom Leedum is the only person running against him. With that being said, there were great leaders willing to step up and run against Hoffa in the last election. The problem is that if Hoffa runs, someone else runs and Leedum is in there as well there is a chance for a 3 way split and Leedum could have snuck in with 34% of the vote and nobody wanted to see that. I do not think he is the right guy to run the Teamsters. Now, this 3rd party supposedly went to Leedum and said, "If you feel the leadership of the IBT is in such disaray then back out, I will run against Hoffa and make the changes necessary to do what needs to be done." Leedum said no way, the 3rd party backed out and here we go wasting our money again on a useless effort. So TDU and Leedum weren't about cleaning up the IBT as they claimed, it was about getting ahold of it and doing what they want with it and if they can't get ahold of it they are going to make you and I spend millions of dollars in the process.Can you give an example of anything they have done to weaken a union?
It doesn't matter if he did or didn't, you would try to pick his reply apart to satisfy your agenda. Which is like Big E said, is to divide.Can you give an example of anything they have done to weaken a union?
not quite, I have posted links in the past and almost every time, someone says Don't beleive what TDU has to say there anti-ibt or somthing like that.
I do not know of anything bad they have done, I don't see where they get there negativety from.
Just like this thread, you and steve5 direct it towards me for asking a question, but noone. But noone questions the people who talk badly about the TDU.
What wrongs have they done? If it wasn't for them none of us would not of had a copy of the contract so early.
What is a shame is you call me asking a question sh!t slinging, you resort to name calling, if you think this is so blantant sh!t slinging then it should be very easy for you to list all the negative things they do, rather then attack me.
I have posted alot of links to teamster.org also.
I apoligize Elvis I guess I can only post pro-IBT links on his forum or else you see it as trying to divide us.
TDU= to destroy unions.................
Tear Down the Union..........
most members ive met in the last few years have told me that,thats what t,d,u stood for....
apwa dressed in a different sheep suit....:28:
Yes!!!!!!! TDU has had Tom Leedum run against Jimmy Hoffa in the last 2 General elections. He had no chance to win either election, knew he couldn't win and cost the IBT millions of dollars by getting just enough delegate votes to be able to run for the General President's job. Now generally, I would say more power to you but in this case it was B.S. and I will tell you why. First let me say that I am not a Jimmy Hoffa supporter, of course, that is unless Tom Leedum is the only person running against him. With that being said, there were great leaders willing to step up and run against Hoffa in the last election. The problem is that if Hoffa runs, someone else runs and Leedum is in there as well there is a chance for a 3 way split and Leedum could have snuck in with 34% of the vote and nobody wanted to see that. I do not think he is the right guy to run the Teamsters. Now, this 3rd party supposedly went to Leedum and said, "If you feel the leadership of the IBT is in such disaray then back out, I will run against Hoffa and make the changes necessary to do what needs to be done." Leedum said no way, the 3rd party backed out and here we go wasting our money again on a useless effort. So TDU and Leedum weren't about cleaning up the IBT as they claimed, it was about getting ahold of it and doing what they want with it and if they can't get ahold of it they are going to make you and I spend millions of dollars in the process.
The next item is the laying in the weeds and after something is done then chiming in and saying that it shouldn't have been done this way, you should have done it that way. That just drives me nuts and it happened after the Master Freight agreement was TA'd and it pissed me off to no end. If you want to be a leader get out and lead. Don't lay in the weeds and call somebody out after the fact.
Yes!!!!!!! TDU has had Tom Leedum run against Jimmy Hoffa in the last 2 General elections. He had no chance to win either election, knew he couldn't win and cost the IBT millions of dollars by getting just enough delegate votes to be able to run for the General President's job. Now generally, I would say more power to you but in this case it was B.S. and I will tell you why. First let me say that I am not a Jimmy Hoffa supporter, of course, that is unless Tom Leedum is the only person running against him. With that being said, there were great leaders willing to step up and run against Hoffa in the last election. The problem is that if Hoffa runs, someone else runs and Leedum is in there as well there is a chance for a 3 way split and Leedum could have snuck in with 34% of the vote and nobody wanted to see that. I do not think he is the right guy to run the Teamsters. Now, this 3rd party supposedly went to Leedum and said, "If you feel the leadership of the IBT is in such disaray then back out, I will run against Hoffa and make the changes necessary to do what needs to be done." Leedum said no way, the 3rd party backed out and here we go wasting our money again on a useless effort. So TDU and Leedum weren't about cleaning up the IBT as they claimed, it was about getting ahold of it and doing what they want with it and if they can't get ahold of it they are going to make you and I spend millions of dollars in the process.
The next item is the laying in the weeds and after something is done then chiming in and saying that it shouldn't have been done this way, you should have done it that way. That just drives me nuts and it happened after the Master Freight agreement was TA'd and it pissed me off to no end. If you want to be a leader get out and lead. Don't lay in the weeds and call somebody out after the fact.
If he didn't have a chance to win then why did the IBT have to spend millions to beat him?
I still don't see where the TDU has done anything wrong.
If he didn't have a chance to win then why did the IBT have to spend millions to beat him?
I still don't see where the TDU has done anything wrong.