The company could have held off on 40 million worth of equipment until 2018 and showed a decent year nd profit if they wanted to.Sometimes I think there is a little stock manipulation.
The company with the worst equipment in the industry should not purchase or lease new equipment? Oxymoron. I would worry more about all the worker comp claims, cargo claims, productivity and load average for a better contract.
The company with the worst equipment in the industry should not purchase or lease new equipment? Oxymoron. I would worry more about all the worker comp claims, cargo claims, productivity and load average for a better contract.
I agree with your points, but the first is brought to the fore because of an aging workforce, required to perform at a challenging level, with fewer earned days off to recooperate.
The company with the worst equipment in the industry should not purchase or lease new equipment? Oxymoron. I would worry more about all the worker comp claims, cargo claims, productivity and load average for a better contract.
That’s not what I said at all. They could have spent 40 million less down the stretch and held off for a couple months.Spent 90 million on equipment instead of 133 million and showed a 30 +million profit if they wanted too.
That’s not what I said at all. They could have spent 40 million less down the stretch and held off for a couple months.Spent 90 million on equipment instead of 133 million and showed a 30 +million profit if they wanted too.
some of that "funny" money..move the figures around on a balance sheet and skew the numbers that would be more beneficial to the company (can you say wage cuts/concessions?)
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.