ABF | ABF Attacks Pensions?

A pension fund that's already in Rehab and paying a whopping $248 a month, but is somehow entitled to an 8% increase and wants ArcBest to save it? Pension freeze for all...not some...I'm sorry. Time for those 16 new political appointees to fix this problem and time for us...The ABF Teamsters....to force THEIR hand. No more money to broke pension funds. Pension reform NOW! Vote YES for your raise and restored vacation and tell Congress to get their asses to work...like yesterday! YRCW will restore wages I'm pretty confident next year to retain drivers, but will probably never pay full pension again. MEP plans are going to soon be a memory.
 
A pension fund that's already in Rehab and paying a whopping $248 a month, but is somehow entitled to an 8% increase and wants ArcBest to save it? Pension freeze for all...not some...I'm sorry. Time for those 16 new political appointees to fix this problem and time for us...The ABF Teamsters....to force THEIR hand. No more money to broke pension funds. Pension reform NOW! Vote YES for your raise and restored vacation and tell Congress to get their asses to work...like yesterday! YRCW will restore wages I'm pretty confident next year to retain drivers, but will probably never pay full pension again. MEP plans are going to soon be a memory.

Why don't you try telling the whole story there turncoat? How about saying that ABF had the chance to either transition to a new liability payment pool which would of reduced the value of each member's pension by about $9,000 per year.. like UPS and other Teamster's employers have done or continue paying an 8-percent-a-year increase to maintain the status quo.

That's right... it made financial sense to UPS which got out from under a heavy withdrawal liability and given more than 50 years with which to make those payments. So UPS decided it was best to pay that $1.2 billion in withdrawal liability by entering an agreement to pay the withdrawal liability in annual $43 million installments over 50 years.

But guess what... ABF said hell no because those greedy and arrogant POS thought they could eventually find a way around that withdrawal liability just like YRC... by way of contract negotiations. How about just try thinking sometimes before you just spout off? This way there's less of chance of you showing your ignorance... not much... but someone like you needs to take advantage of everything you can in order to not look foolish and ignorant. You know... It's better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt.

If you did take a moment or two and think and know your history along with spending some time doing a little research... you might just come to the conclusion that ABF went after the wages... vacations and less stringent work rules last contract and now coming for the Health & Welfare and Pension. That's right... they now give you that vacation back that you gave them in the first place... get that raise you were supposed to get in 2013 and you act like you just hit the jackpot and could care less about anything else... right? You are a damn fool!

But this doesn't surprise me one bit about you seeing how you voted to give away the farm at YRC right before you left then came to ABF and voted to give away their farm too.
 
A pension fund that's already in Rehab and paying a whopping $248 a month, but is somehow entitled to an 8% increase and wants ArcBest to save it? Pension freeze for all...not some...I'm sorry. Time for those 16 new political appointees to fix this problem and time for us...The ABF Teamsters....to force THEIR hand. No more money to broke pension funds. Pension reform NOW! Vote YES for your raise and restored vacation and tell Congress to get their asses to work...like yesterday! YRCW will restore wages I'm pretty confident next year to retain drivers, but will probably never pay full pension again. MEP plans are going to soon be a memory.
This from a guy that is ready to give up at the drop of a hat. If they ever get out of the fund they will sell abf as soon as possible. It all has to do with the end result. Judy and company have weak people like you helping to destroy the very lives of the Teamster employees. All they do is take take and take and your still wanting to give up more.

What do you think they would do with the money they would get from not making pension payments? Do you think they would give it to us. I got news for you they would not give it to us. So stop crying about the pension payments. We will get some sort of a pension no matter what you weak pansy. Docker is to kind to your kind. You make a Teamster want to to puke.
 
Last edited:
A pension fund that's already in Rehab and paying a whopping $248 a month, but is somehow entitled to an 8% increase and wants ArcBest to save it? Pension freeze for all...not some...I'm sorry. Time for those 16 new political appointees to fix this problem and time for us...The ABF Teamsters....to force THEIR hand. No more money to broke pension funds. Pension reform NOW! Vote YES for your raise and restored vacation and tell Congress to get their asses to work...like yesterday! YRCW will restore wages I'm pretty confident next year to retain drivers, but will probably never pay full pension again. MEP plans are going to soon be a memory.
And remember TAINT if they stop paying into Central States they stop payments into all the funds.
 
Docker is to kind to your kind. You make a Teamster to want to puke.

You see that Trux... Muler finally admitted it... that I'm the nice one. So please... mark it on your calendar... I may need it for future reference.
 
Docker and Muler, I think Turncoat is correct in some of what he says. I don't believe YRC would still be in business if the employees had not taken a pay and benefits cut in 2009. Yellow had borrowed so much money to buy Roadway, Holland and a couple of other companies that they could not pay their loans after the economy went into recessin. The federal government had to allow a debt for equity swap with some of YRC creditors to allow YRC to stay in business. Even then YRC had to sell property, and lease it back, just to make interest only payments.
 
ABF's.......Excuse me,....ArcBest's... position, both this contract and last contract, has been a race to the bottom with their "designated" competitor,...YRC. Cuts to pension contributions will only exacerbate the demise of defined-benefit pensions . Once they're gone,.......you'll never get them back.......

Let's....remind...the negotiators the reason Congress voted a permanent 15% tax cut for the private sector,......was so that the WORKERS could share in the largesse of a bigger profit base.

ANY removal of any sort of benefit just adds to the corporate bottom line ....at OUR expense.

And,.........this does not even begin to address the driver shortage issue. The companies do everything they can to deflect away the fact that,......anyone with a CDL,....especially with a HAZ-MAT endorsement,....is a SCARCE commodity.

In business,....you pay DEARLY for a scarce commodity....

How Ernie and Co. can even contemplate stepping any of our benefits backward,....is beyond me. Let alone not coming up with equitable pay raises that bring us up to the NON-UNION level,....not the YRC level.

Trucking industry across the board,...is looking at the ABF contract as a bellwhether,.....as to whether the IBT is going to play footsie with the companies again,.....or whether they're going to live up to their chartered purpose,....and negotiate for the rank-and-file,...for a change.....

I thought the "rumor" was that we were going to...."like"....what's in this tentative agreement.

Once again,...it seems like ArcBest is going to roll the dice, and bet on the gullibility of it's employees........
How Ernie and Co. can even contemplate stepping any of our benefits backward,....is beyond me. Let alone not coming up with equitable pay raises that bring us up to the NON-UNION level,....not the YRC level.
Maybe this is Ernie Soehl's way of getting back at Sean O'Brien for him coming out against Hoffa not too long ago?
http://www.tdu.org/sean_o_brien_blasts_hoffa_as_feud_goes_public

y71pyBe.jpg

Payback's a bitch Sean!

ksLYSkZ.jpg

So much for "Teamster Solidarity" Ernie!
:wtflol:
 
Docker and Muler, I think Turncoat is correct in some of what he says. I don't believe YRC would still be in business if the employees had not taken a pay and benefits cut in 2009. Yellow had borrowed so much money to buy Roadway, Holland and a couple of other companies that they could not pay their loans after the economy went into recessin. The federal government had to allow a debt for equity swap with some of YRC creditors to allow YRC to stay in business. Even then YRC had to sell property, and lease it back, just to make interest only payments.


This may sound harsh and uncaring Homesick but the Teamsters are not responsible for the company's greed... inadequacies and incompetence. I'm a firm believer in "if you can't pay the rate... lock the gate" because if a company isn't run properly and mismanaged... it's going to end up faltering one way or another... and even with employee sacrifices... that only postpones the inevitable .

You may be right... there might of been a good possibility that YRC would of shut the doors if sacrifices weren't made. The decision to make sacrifices was all up to the YRC Teamsters... but... the pension fund had absolutely no business being put on the table because they weren't the only ones in that pension fund and didn't for one minute think on how that would affect the remaining members in that fund. Hell... they didn't even know how that would end up affecting them at the time! IMO... if they actually thought that the company couldn't survive without sacrifices and were willing to take the gamble and make those sacrifices... take a bigger wage percentage cut but leave the multi-employer pension out of it... hence the word multi.

If you really think about it... guess who are the one's profiting on the member's sacrifices... just because of the company's greed... inadequacies and incompetence? That would be the IBT with the dues still rolling in.... the company itself doing business as usual... the YRC executives still running the poorly managed company and of course the banks... the biggest winner of all of this because they're making a killing on the interest alone with very little coming off the principal. And guess who the sole losers are... the only ones still making the sacrifices... the YRC Teamsters!

I'm sorry but that sure doesn't sound like a good proposition and course of action to me... at least from the YRC Teamster's perspective. I just see that as foolish... as I'm sure many YRC Teamsters also do.
 
A pension fund that's already in Rehab and paying a whopping $248 a month, but is somehow entitled to an 8% increase and wants ArcBest to save it? Pension freeze for all...not some...I'm sorry. Time for those 16 new political appointees to fix this problem and time for us...The ABF Teamsters....to force THEIR hand. No more money to broke pension funds. Pension reform NOW! Vote YES for your raise and restored vacation and tell Congress to get their asses to work...like yesterday! YRCW will restore wages I'm pretty confident next year to retain drivers, but will probably never pay full pension again. MEP plans are going to soon be a memory.
Turncoat, wow, I thought you had hidden away..how are things down in Mayberry?
I hear Andy is going to hire a new deputy to keep up with them speeding trucks?
I used to say "we hear you talking, but no one is listening...now everyone is listening and you ain't talking"...It is better to be thought a fool than to talk/post and remove all doubt..that applies to you
 
This may sound harsh and uncaring Homesick but the Teamsters are not responsible for the company's greed... inadequacies and incompetence. I'm a firm believer in "if you can't pay the rate... lock the gate" because if a company isn't run properly and mismanaged... it's going to end up faltering one way or another... and even with employee sacrifices... that only postpones the inevitable .

You may be right... there might of been a good possibility that YRC would of shut the doors if sacrifices weren't made. The decision to make sacrifices was all up to the YRC Teamsters... but... the pension fund had absolutely no business being put on the table because they weren't the only ones in that pension fund and didn't for one minute think on how that would affect the remaining members in that fund. Hell... they didn't even know how that would end up affecting them at the time! IMO... if they actually thought that the company couldn't survive without sacrifices and were willing to take the gamble and make those sacrifices... take a bigger wage percentage cut but leave the multi-employer pension out of it... hence the word multi.

If you really think about it... guess who are the one's profiting on the member's sacrifices... just because of the company's greed... inadequacies and incompetence? That would be the IBT with the dues still rolling in.... the company itself doing business as usual... the YRC executives still running the poorly managed company and of course the banks... the biggest winner of all of this because they're making a killing on the interest alone with very little coming off the principal. And guess who the sole losers are... the only ones still making the sacrifices... the YRC Teamsters!

I'm sorry but that sure doesn't sound like a good proposition and course of action to me... at least from the YRC Teamster's perspective. I just see that as foolish... as I'm sure many YRC Teamsters also do.
I agree the banks and company executives gained the most. Stock investors lost because more company shares were issued and this, along with bad management, lowered the share price..... But at the time the economy was in resesion and jobs were hard to find. Most of the road drivers I know at ABF (086) who were laid off could only find employment with companies like SWIFT and KLLM. That put the YRC employees and the Teamsters in a tough position; accept wage reduction or chance the company closing its doors. IMO and most YRC employees, closing the doors at YRC was an almost certainty. That is why so many YRC employees voted for the wage and benifts cut. (If you happen to have the YRC first pay cut vote information would you look at how the vote went?) IMO the Teamsters and the pensions had a fiduciary duty to the employees to keep them employed if at all possible. I would like to know how many retired teamsters had their pension reduced when the YRC employees had their wages reduced? Is if fair that retirees maintaned their salaries while the working employees had their pay reduced? The situation was terrible and a lot of Americans lost jobs, homes, vehicles, saving, retirement accounts, etc. Do I personally agree with the decisions made, I don't know. I'm just very thankful I didn't have to make it.
 
This from a guy that is ready to give up at the drop of a hat. If they ever get out of the fund they will sell abf as soon as possible. It all has to do with the end result. Judy and company have weak people like you helping to destroy the very lives of the Teamster employees. All they do is take take and take and your still wanting to give up more.

What do you think they would do with the money they would get from not making pension payments? Do you think they would give it to us. I got news for you they would not give it to us. So stop crying about the pension payments. We will get some sort of a pension no matter what you weak pansy. Docker is to kind to your kind. You make a Teamster want to to puke.
Well as this leak has trickled out, I understand they are wanting to FREEZE the current rate, NOT QUIT PAYING. Let the lawmakers put it into LAW what's required and what will be payed out. Then WE ALL get a haircut! I'm glad many have through the years and continue to get full pensions, but is it unreasonable that adjustments be made where we ALL get something to supplement our retirement. Some just want it to pay them in full until it's gone and to hell with the rest....and I'm the selfish one! Almighty Muler and Spin-Docker seriously need to get a life! I'm not going to argue with you two. Got a gobbler to hunt early tomorrow. Have a good evening.
 
Last edited:
I agree the banks and company executives gained the most. Stock investors lost because more company shares were issued and this, along with bad management, lowered the share price..... But at the time the economy was in resesion and jobs were hard to find. Most of the road drivers I know at ABF (086) who were laid off could only find employment with companies like SWIFT and KLLM. That put the YRC employees and the Teamsters in a tough position; accept wage reduction or chance the company closing its doors. IMO and most YRC employees, closing the doors at YRC was an almost certainty. That is why so many YRC employees voted for the wage and benifts cut. (If you happen to have the YRC first pay cut vote information would you look at how the vote went?) IMO the Teamsters and the pensions had a fiduciary duty to the employees to keep them employed if at all possible. I would like to know how many retired teamsters had their pension reduced when the YRC employees had their wages reduced? Is if fair that retirees maintaned their salaries while the working employees had their pay reduced? The situation was terrible and a lot of Americans lost jobs, homes, vehicles, saving, retirement accounts, etc. Do I personally agree with the decisions made, I don't know. I'm just very thankful I didn't have to make it.
Careful Homesick, any inkling that you think TurnCoat has anything to add to the dialog and you will draw the ire of Jeff's experts. And KK wants to act like he didn't have to go through the crapola too. A bankruptcy would have devestated more folks! I left YRC by the grace of God, and moved everyone up on the board while I took a bottom spot at ABF. It was meant to be.
 
Careful Homesick, any inkling that you think TurnCoat has anything to add to the dialog and you will draw the ire of Jeff's experts. And KK wants to act like he didn't have to go through the crapola too. A bankruptcy would have devestated more folks! I left YRC by the grace of God, and moved everyone up on the board while I took a bottom spot at ABF. It was meant to be.
Thanks for the warning but I think I'm old enough to hold my own. As for KK, he has known me for years. KK has seen me angry at union meetings. I believe he was BA at local 728 when Ken Bryant asked president Randy Brown to have the sargent of arms escort me from the building (Ken was telling us how we had to take a 15% pay cut or ABF would not meet payroll). KK does stand up for what he believes and he has taken sacrifices. KK's pension would be a lot larger if he had remained in the BA position. Good luck Turkey hunting. My wife and I watched apr15-20 turkey moving across our back pasture a couple of weeks ago.
 
Careful Homesick, any inkling that you think TurnCoat has anything to add to the dialog and you will draw the ire of Jeff's experts. And KK wants to act like he didn't have to go through the crapola too. A bankruptcy would have devestated more folks! I left YRC by the grace of God, and moved everyone up on the board while I took a bottom spot at ABF. It was meant to be.
And, is there anything I wrote that is not true?
 
I agree the banks and company executives gained the most. Stock investors lost because more company shares were issued and this, along with bad management, lowered the share price..... But at the time the economy was in resesion and jobs were hard to find. Most of the road drivers I know at ABF (086) who were laid off could only find employment with companies like SWIFT and KLLM. That put the YRC employees and the Teamsters in a tough position; accept wage reduction or chance the company closing its doors. IMO and most YRC employees, closing the doors at YRC was an almost certainty. That is why so many YRC employees voted for the wage and benifts cut. (If you happen to have the YRC first pay cut vote information would you look at how the vote went?) IMO the Teamsters and the pensions had a fiduciary duty to the employees to keep them employed if at all possible. I would like to know how many retired teamsters had their pension reduced when the YRC employees had their wages reduced? Is if fair that retirees maintaned their salaries while the working employees had their pay reduced? The situation was terrible and a lot of Americans lost jobs, homes, vehicles, saving, retirement accounts, etc. Do I personally agree with the decisions made, I don't know. I'm just very thankful I didn't have to make it.

You say that the economy was in recession and jobs were hard to find... I won't disagree with that but fear isn't a valid reason to throw common sense out the window. Fear tells you one thing and one thing only... Oh my... just what am I going to do... automatically it's... I have to take whatever is offered without even considering other options. Common sense tells you that they may end up shutting the doors even with the sacrifices so you still may find yourself without a job in the near future. Common sense also tells you that even though the economy was in recession... if a company as big as YRC does close their doors... all the other trucking companies will be on a hiring spree... right or wrong? Common sense also tells you many other things like doing as much research as you possibly can to see if you are being told the truth in the first place. That's always the funny thing about fear... once fear it takes hold... common sense goes out the window and you can bet the companies and the IBT knows it. After all... how do think the 2013 contract got passed?

As far as I'm concerned... if only one retired Teamster had their pension reduced when the YRC employees accepted that agreement is too many. After all... they had no say in the matter because it wasn't as you say that all retirees maintained their salaries while the working employees voluntarily accepted to have their pay reduced. I personally know a retired Holland Teamster that had to go back to work because he couldn't afford to live off the mandatory drastic cut he was forced to accept! So there goes that argument out the window. If you want to talk about fair... just how fair is that... the retirees not even given the opportunity to vote on the matter when their pension was involved in that BS agreement? Tell me... just how would you feel if you were that man? So how about also being thankful that you weren't in that man's shoes too. What happened to that man is a damn shame and makes me angry... how about you?

Now... let's even take it one step further... that same man then got on at ABF... and what happens then... he gets screwed again when the ABF Teamsters voted away the farm. And since you seem to have a turncoat cheering you on now... just how about that turncoat... he actually got the chance to screw that man twice... how about that because I can guarantee you that doesn't bother turncoat in the slightest... maybe even to the extent of smiling about it seeing how proud he is about being labeled a traitor and all.?
 
Thanks for the warning but I think I'm old enough to hold my own. As for KK, he has known me for years. KK has seen me angry at union meetings. I believe he was BA at local 728 when Ken Bryant asked president Randy Brown to have the sargent of arms escort me from the building (Ken was telling us how we had to take a 15% pay cut or ABF would not meet payroll). KK does stand up for what he believes and he has taken sacrifices. KK's pension would be a lot larger if he had remained in the BA position. Good luck Turkey hunting. My wife and I watched apr15-20 turkey moving across our back pasture a couple of weeks ago.

Oh my... KK has seen you angry and the Sergeant at Arms had to escort me from the building... lol

Who are you trying to impress with that statement because it sure isn't me.
 
Careful Homesick, any inkling that you think TurnCoat has anything to add to the dialog and you will draw the ire of Jeff's experts. And KK wants to act like he didn't have to go through the crapola too. A bankruptcy would have devestated more folks! I left YRC by the grace of God, and moved everyone up on the board while I took a bottom spot at ABF. It was meant to be.

There you go again... not telling the whole story. You left alright... but not before you voted to screw them!!!

It's nice to see that you finally grew a pair now that you have someone else by you side... lol

What's the word used to describe people like that... that's right... lily-livered cowards that can't stand on their own.
 
Top