Upon layoff at the terminal in Kansas City - I filed grievances relating to Article 5: Seniority in relation to Section 2: Layoffs due to the fact that I had greater "job classification" seniority than an employee who transferred to the terminal from another terminal. I was told that it was not applicable due to the following Memo of Understanding which was faxed to me by the president of our local:
1. It is the parties intent that the phrase "... last employee hired on the affected classification seniority list..." is a reference to the date an individual became a full-time employee with the Employeer, not the date the employee entered the job classification in which the layoff may be occuring.
2. This Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) shall become effective on the date it is signed and will be applied prospectively. However, the parties agree that any pending grievances concerning the Company's use of classification seniority to identify employees for layoff, shall be considered settled on the basis of this MOU. The Company shall apply the language in paragraph 1 to those cases and take the steps to notify those employees who need to be recalled. No monetary payments shall be made.
3. This MOU shall not apply to any provisions of the contract other than Article 5 Section 2.
As far as transfers go: As I posted previously, I had inquired on an opening here in Wichita - I talked to the TM here who talked to the TM in KC - I also was left a message from Mike Eastman (regional HR for UPS Freight) who stated that I would not be allowed a transfer due to the fact that the terminal in Kansas City is a Union terminal and the terminal in Wichita is non union. However, I was told by Mike Eastman that if the terminal in Wichita was union - I could transfer but as it stood, if I wanted to, I could "quit" the position I am laid off from and apply as a new hire in Wichita, giving up all company seniority.
Misinformation or not - this is the information being passed down to me from those who should know what they are talking about.
Additionally - it was made known to me by the president of the local that the second in command, just under hoffa, has the power to interpret the contract and make decisions as he sees fit.